{"title":"数量还是质量?环境监管对绿色创新的影响评估","authors":"Zhensheng Li , Boqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107726"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity or quality? The impact assessment of environmental regulation on green innovation\",\"authors\":\"Zhensheng Li , Boqiang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003135\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantity or quality? The impact assessment of environmental regulation on green innovation
As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.