数量还是质量?环境监管对绿色创新的影响评估

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zhensheng Li , Boqiang Lin
{"title":"数量还是质量?环境监管对绿色创新的影响评估","authors":"Zhensheng Li ,&nbsp;Boqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107726"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity or quality? The impact assessment of environmental regulation on green innovation\",\"authors\":\"Zhensheng Li ,&nbsp;Boqiang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003135\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为旨在实现资源节约和环境保护的技术进步,绿色技术创新为可持续发展提供了重要推力。波特假说在中国环境体系中成立吗?本文以中国环境法规的典范--《清洁空气行动计划》为研究对象。基于专利数据和分类,从数量和质量两个维度衡量中国的绿色创新活动。本文采用回归控制法,通过构建反事实框架,评估了《清洁空气行动计划》对绿色技术创新的政策效应。实证研究结果表明,环境监管对绿色创新活动起到了积极的促进作用。然而,从统计数据和经济规模来看,对专利质量的积极影响明显小于对专利数量的积极影响。进一步的分析表明,政策效应在不同范围具有异质性:量和质的提升仅体现在废物管理的绿色专利上,这意味着创新集中在末端处理上,绿色创新具有明显的路径依赖性。本文为探索绿色转型的路径提供了新的微观证据和理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantity or quality? The impact assessment of environmental regulation on green innovation
As technological progress aimed at realizing resource conservation and environmental protection, green technology innovation provides an important nudge for sustainable development. Is the Porter Hypothesis valid in China's environmental system? This paper's focus centers on the Clean Air Action Plan, the paradigmatic environmental regulation in China. Based on the patent data and classification, China's green innovation activities are measured from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. Using the regression control method, this paper assessed the policy effect of the Clean Air Action Plan on green technology innovation by constructing a counterfactual framework. The empirical findings indicate that environmental regulation has positively stimulated green innovation activities. However, regarding both statistics and economic magnitude, the positive impact on patent quality is significantly smaller than on patent quantity. Further analysis shows that policy effect is heterogeneous in different scopes: the quantitative and qualitative improvement is only embodied in green patents of waste management, which implies that innovation is concentrated on end-of-pipe treatment, with a pronounced path dependence in green innovation. This paper provides new micro-level evidence and theoretical support for exploring pathways to green transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信