使用新型弹性磨料喷射加工方法对钛合金进行表面改性

IF 5.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS
Kejia Zhuang , Ying Li , Jian Weng , Zhizheng Wu , Shuqiang Li , Zhonghua Li , Li Ma
{"title":"使用新型弹性磨料喷射加工方法对钛合金进行表面改性","authors":"Kejia Zhuang ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Jian Weng ,&nbsp;Zhizheng Wu ,&nbsp;Shuqiang Li ,&nbsp;Zhonghua Li ,&nbsp;Li Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Surface modification is always employed to enhance surface integrity, where abrasive jet machining (AJM) represents a large portion. This paper investigates the impact of a new elastic abrasive jet machining (EAJM) method on the surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy. A self-developed multi-element polymer microbead covered by diamond powders is employed as the abrasive with a hardness of approximately 50–80 HV. This study systematically examines and compares the performance of elastic and hard abrasives in surface modification of Ti6Al4V by AJM, investigating the effects of nozzle pressure (<em>P</em>) and traverse speed (<em>v</em>) on surface integrity. The lowest surface roughness and highest microhardness are achieved by EAJM under the condition of <em>P</em> = 350 kPa and <em>v</em> = 0.75 mm/s. Hard abrasive jet machining (HAJM) tends to produce poor surface quality when excessive parameters are applied, while the performance of EAJM is relatively stable. The most compressive residual stresses obtained by EAJM and HAJM are −300 and −140 MPa, respectively. EAJM is able to modify the surface characteristics and produce a better surface quality with a lower material removal amount compared to HAJM. In addition, the relatively lower crushing rate of the elastic matrix and the fact that the material removal capability of EAJM relies on the diamond powders on the abrasive surface make it easier for EAJM to maintain its performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22009,"journal":{"name":"Surface & Coatings Technology","volume":"495 ","pages":"Article 131573"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface modification of titanium alloy using a novel elastic abrasive jet machining method\",\"authors\":\"Kejia Zhuang ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Jian Weng ,&nbsp;Zhizheng Wu ,&nbsp;Shuqiang Li ,&nbsp;Zhonghua Li ,&nbsp;Li Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Surface modification is always employed to enhance surface integrity, where abrasive jet machining (AJM) represents a large portion. This paper investigates the impact of a new elastic abrasive jet machining (EAJM) method on the surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy. A self-developed multi-element polymer microbead covered by diamond powders is employed as the abrasive with a hardness of approximately 50–80 HV. This study systematically examines and compares the performance of elastic and hard abrasives in surface modification of Ti6Al4V by AJM, investigating the effects of nozzle pressure (<em>P</em>) and traverse speed (<em>v</em>) on surface integrity. The lowest surface roughness and highest microhardness are achieved by EAJM under the condition of <em>P</em> = 350 kPa and <em>v</em> = 0.75 mm/s. Hard abrasive jet machining (HAJM) tends to produce poor surface quality when excessive parameters are applied, while the performance of EAJM is relatively stable. The most compressive residual stresses obtained by EAJM and HAJM are −300 and −140 MPa, respectively. EAJM is able to modify the surface characteristics and produce a better surface quality with a lower material removal amount compared to HAJM. In addition, the relatively lower crushing rate of the elastic matrix and the fact that the material removal capability of EAJM relies on the diamond powders on the abrasive surface make it easier for EAJM to maintain its performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface & Coatings Technology\",\"volume\":\"495 \",\"pages\":\"Article 131573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface & Coatings Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897224012040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface & Coatings Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897224012040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高表面的完整性,人们总是采用表面改性的方法,其中喷射磨料加工(AJM)占了很大一部分。本文研究了一种新型弹性磨料喷射加工(EAJM)方法对 Ti6Al4V 合金表面特性的影响。磨料采用了自主研发的多元素聚合物微珠,表面覆盖金刚石粉末,硬度约为 50-80 HV。本研究系统地考察和比较了弹性磨料和硬磨料在 AJM 对 Ti6Al4V 进行表面改性时的性能,研究了喷嘴压力(P)和横移速度(v)对表面完整性的影响。在 P = 350 kPa 和 v = 0.75 mm/s 条件下,EAJM 的表面粗糙度最低,显微硬度最高。硬质磨料喷射加工(HAJM)在应用过多参数时往往会产生较差的表面质量,而 EAJM 的性能则相对稳定。EAJM 和 HAJM 获得的最大压缩残余应力分别为 -300 和 -140 兆帕。与 HAJM 相比,EAJM 能够改变表面特性,并以较低的材料去除量获得更好的表面质量。此外,弹性基体的破碎率相对较低,而且 EAJM 的材料去除能力依赖于磨料表面的金刚石粉末,这使得 EAJM 更容易保持其性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surface modification of titanium alloy using a novel elastic abrasive jet machining method
Surface modification is always employed to enhance surface integrity, where abrasive jet machining (AJM) represents a large portion. This paper investigates the impact of a new elastic abrasive jet machining (EAJM) method on the surface characteristics of Ti6Al4V alloy. A self-developed multi-element polymer microbead covered by diamond powders is employed as the abrasive with a hardness of approximately 50–80 HV. This study systematically examines and compares the performance of elastic and hard abrasives in surface modification of Ti6Al4V by AJM, investigating the effects of nozzle pressure (P) and traverse speed (v) on surface integrity. The lowest surface roughness and highest microhardness are achieved by EAJM under the condition of P = 350 kPa and v = 0.75 mm/s. Hard abrasive jet machining (HAJM) tends to produce poor surface quality when excessive parameters are applied, while the performance of EAJM is relatively stable. The most compressive residual stresses obtained by EAJM and HAJM are −300 and −140 MPa, respectively. EAJM is able to modify the surface characteristics and produce a better surface quality with a lower material removal amount compared to HAJM. In addition, the relatively lower crushing rate of the elastic matrix and the fact that the material removal capability of EAJM relies on the diamond powders on the abrasive surface make it easier for EAJM to maintain its performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surface & Coatings Technology
Surface & Coatings Technology 工程技术-材料科学:膜
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
921
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Surface and Coatings Technology is an international archival journal publishing scientific papers on significant developments in surface and interface engineering to modify and improve the surface properties of materials for protection in demanding contact conditions or aggressive environments, or for enhanced functional performance. Contributions range from original scientific articles concerned with fundamental and applied aspects of research or direct applications of metallic, inorganic, organic and composite coatings, to invited reviews of current technology in specific areas. Papers submitted to this journal are expected to be in line with the following aspects in processes, and properties/performance: A. Processes: Physical and chemical vapour deposition techniques, thermal and plasma spraying, surface modification by directed energy techniques such as ion, electron and laser beams, thermo-chemical treatment, wet chemical and electrochemical processes such as plating, sol-gel coating, anodization, plasma electrolytic oxidation, etc., but excluding painting. B. Properties/performance: friction performance, wear resistance (e.g., abrasion, erosion, fretting, etc), corrosion and oxidation resistance, thermal protection, diffusion resistance, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, and properties relevant to smart materials behaviour and enhanced multifunctional performance for environmental, energy and medical applications, but excluding device aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信