Daniel Hill, Patrick Rogers, Jonathan Phillips, Ben Waterson, Andrew D. Toms
{"title":"在计划翻修手术时,SPECT-CT 可帮助确定翻修干式植入物问题全膝关节置换术哪一侧松动","authors":"Daniel Hill, Patrick Rogers, Jonathan Phillips, Ben Waterson, Andrew D. Toms","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of single component aseptic loosening in patients with a problematic cemented stemmed TKR (Total Knee Replacement).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>SPECT-CT was performed where aseptic loosening was suspected but was not clear on plain radiography. Demographics, suspected diagnosis and intention to revise were collected prospectively before and after SPECT-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>30 patients were investigated. 43% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) had clear evidence of loosening on SPECT-CT. In 23% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4) intention to perform revision surgery following SPECT-CT changed (7/30) (<em>p</em> = 0.0004, standard error = 42.1, <em>z</em> = 3.5).</div><div>Intentions to perform revision surgery according to the radiologist’s overall summary were:</div><div>Normal SPECT-CT – 0% (95% CI: 0.0–0.8) intention to revise (0/2).</div><div>Possibly abnormal SPECT-CT – 13% (95% CI: 0.0–0.4) intention to revise (2/15).</div><div>Definitely abnormal SPECT-CT – 77% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) intention to revise (10/13).</div><div>We report that SPECT-CT had a test sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.6–1.0), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%.</div><div>In 70% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) of cases where revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening SPECT-CT provided information that guided pre-operative planning with regards single component or both component revision surgery (7/10).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>When positive SPECT-CT was useful in determining single component revision. A normal SPECT-CT may have a negative predictive value; however, overall half of our series had a possibly abnormal or equivocal investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 179-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hill, Patrick Rogers, Jonathan Phillips, Ben Waterson, Andrew D. Toms\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of single component aseptic loosening in patients with a problematic cemented stemmed TKR (Total Knee Replacement).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>SPECT-CT was performed where aseptic loosening was suspected but was not clear on plain radiography. Demographics, suspected diagnosis and intention to revise were collected prospectively before and after SPECT-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>30 patients were investigated. 43% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) had clear evidence of loosening on SPECT-CT. In 23% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4) intention to perform revision surgery following SPECT-CT changed (7/30) (<em>p</em> = 0.0004, standard error = 42.1, <em>z</em> = 3.5).</div><div>Intentions to perform revision surgery according to the radiologist’s overall summary were:</div><div>Normal SPECT-CT – 0% (95% CI: 0.0–0.8) intention to revise (0/2).</div><div>Possibly abnormal SPECT-CT – 13% (95% CI: 0.0–0.4) intention to revise (2/15).</div><div>Definitely abnormal SPECT-CT – 77% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) intention to revise (10/13).</div><div>We report that SPECT-CT had a test sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.6–1.0), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%.</div><div>In 70% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) of cases where revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening SPECT-CT provided information that guided pre-operative planning with regards single component or both component revision surgery (7/10).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>When positive SPECT-CT was useful in determining single component revision. A normal SPECT-CT may have a negative predictive value; however, overall half of our series had a possibly abnormal or equivocal investigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 179-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001972\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery
Aim
To evaluate SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of single component aseptic loosening in patients with a problematic cemented stemmed TKR (Total Knee Replacement).
Methods
SPECT-CT was performed where aseptic loosening was suspected but was not clear on plain radiography. Demographics, suspected diagnosis and intention to revise were collected prospectively before and after SPECT-CT.
Results
30 patients were investigated. 43% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) had clear evidence of loosening on SPECT-CT. In 23% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4) intention to perform revision surgery following SPECT-CT changed (7/30) (p = 0.0004, standard error = 42.1, z = 3.5).
Intentions to perform revision surgery according to the radiologist’s overall summary were:
Normal SPECT-CT – 0% (95% CI: 0.0–0.8) intention to revise (0/2).
We report that SPECT-CT had a test sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.6–1.0), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%.
In 70% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) of cases where revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening SPECT-CT provided information that guided pre-operative planning with regards single component or both component revision surgery (7/10).
CONCLUSION
When positive SPECT-CT was useful in determining single component revision. A normal SPECT-CT may have a negative predictive value; however, overall half of our series had a possibly abnormal or equivocal investigation.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.