跟踪大脑皮层对视流处理阶段的诱导

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Cai Wingfield , Andrew Soltan , Ian Nimmo-Smith , William D. Marslen-Wilson , Andrew Thwaites
{"title":"跟踪大脑皮层对视流处理阶段的诱导","authors":"Cai Wingfield ,&nbsp;Andrew Soltan ,&nbsp;Ian Nimmo-Smith ,&nbsp;William D. Marslen-Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrew Thwaites","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In human visual processing, information from the visual field passes through numerous transformations before perceptual attributes such as motion are derived. Determining the sequence of transforms involved in the perception of visual motion has been an active field since the 1940s. One plausible family of models are the spatiotemporal energy models, based on computations of motion energy computed from the spatiotemporal features the visual field. One of the most venerated is that of <span><span>Heeger (1988)</span></span>, which hypotheses that motion is estimated by matching the predicted spatiotemporal energy in frequency space. In this study, we investigate the plausibility of Heeger’s model by testing for evidence of cortical entrainment to its components. Entrainment of cortical activity to these components was estimated using measurements of electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EMEG) activity, recorded while healthy subjects watched videos of dots moving left and right across their visual field. We find entrainment to several components of Heeger’s model bilaterally in occipital lobe regions, including representations of motion energy at a latency of 80 ms, overall velocity at 95 ms, and acceleration at 130 ms. We find little evidence of entrainment to displacement. We contrast Heeger’s biologically inspired model with alternative baseline models, finding that Heeger’s model provides a closer fit to the observed data. These results help shed light on the processes through which perception of motion arises in the visual processing stream.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking cortical entrainment to stages of optic-flow processing\",\"authors\":\"Cai Wingfield ,&nbsp;Andrew Soltan ,&nbsp;Ian Nimmo-Smith ,&nbsp;William D. Marslen-Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrew Thwaites\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In human visual processing, information from the visual field passes through numerous transformations before perceptual attributes such as motion are derived. Determining the sequence of transforms involved in the perception of visual motion has been an active field since the 1940s. One plausible family of models are the spatiotemporal energy models, based on computations of motion energy computed from the spatiotemporal features the visual field. One of the most venerated is that of <span><span>Heeger (1988)</span></span>, which hypotheses that motion is estimated by matching the predicted spatiotemporal energy in frequency space. In this study, we investigate the plausibility of Heeger’s model by testing for evidence of cortical entrainment to its components. Entrainment of cortical activity to these components was estimated using measurements of electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EMEG) activity, recorded while healthy subjects watched videos of dots moving left and right across their visual field. We find entrainment to several components of Heeger’s model bilaterally in occipital lobe regions, including representations of motion energy at a latency of 80 ms, overall velocity at 95 ms, and acceleration at 130 ms. We find little evidence of entrainment to displacement. We contrast Heeger’s biologically inspired model with alternative baseline models, finding that Heeger’s model provides a closer fit to the observed data. These results help shed light on the processes through which perception of motion arises in the visual processing stream.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001676\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人类的视觉处理过程中,来自视野的信息要经过无数次变换,才能得出运动等感知属性。自 20 世纪 40 年代以来,确定视觉运动感知所涉及的变换序列一直是一个活跃的领域。时空能量模型是其中一个可信的模型系列,它基于根据视场的时空特征计算出的运动能量。其中最受推崇的是 Heeger(1988 年)的模型,其假设运动是通过匹配频率空间中预测的时空能量来估计的。在本研究中,我们通过测试皮层与该模型各组成部分的相干性来研究 Heeger 模型的合理性。通过测量健康受试者在观看点在视野中左右移动的视频时记录的脑电和脑磁图(EMEG)活动,我们估算了大脑皮层活动与这些成分的夹带。我们发现,在枕叶区域的双侧,Heeger 模型的几个组成部分都存在内联现象,其中包括潜伏期为 80 毫秒的运动能量表征、95 毫秒的整体速度表征和 130 毫秒的加速度表征。我们几乎没有发现与位移相关的证据。我们将 Heeger 的生物启发模型与其他基线模型进行了对比,发现 Heeger 的模型更符合观察到的数据。这些结果有助于揭示运动感知在视觉处理流中产生的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking cortical entrainment to stages of optic-flow processing
In human visual processing, information from the visual field passes through numerous transformations before perceptual attributes such as motion are derived. Determining the sequence of transforms involved in the perception of visual motion has been an active field since the 1940s. One plausible family of models are the spatiotemporal energy models, based on computations of motion energy computed from the spatiotemporal features the visual field. One of the most venerated is that of Heeger (1988), which hypotheses that motion is estimated by matching the predicted spatiotemporal energy in frequency space. In this study, we investigate the plausibility of Heeger’s model by testing for evidence of cortical entrainment to its components. Entrainment of cortical activity to these components was estimated using measurements of electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EMEG) activity, recorded while healthy subjects watched videos of dots moving left and right across their visual field. We find entrainment to several components of Heeger’s model bilaterally in occipital lobe regions, including representations of motion energy at a latency of 80 ms, overall velocity at 95 ms, and acceleration at 130 ms. We find little evidence of entrainment to displacement. We contrast Heeger’s biologically inspired model with alternative baseline models, finding that Heeger’s model provides a closer fit to the observed data. These results help shed light on the processes through which perception of motion arises in the visual processing stream.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信