Fanshuai Hu , Dequn Zhou , Yinghao Pan , Jinghe Sun , Qingyuan Zhu
{"title":"关于可再生能源组合标准和碳排放交易的重叠监管对电力市场的影响","authors":"Fanshuai Hu , Dequn Zhou , Yinghao Pan , Jinghe Sun , Qingyuan Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon emission trading (CET) are considered effective emission reduction policy tools. However, the policy impact will become complex when there is overlapping regulation and an increase in trading entities. To analyze the policy effectiveness, this paper constructs a game model combined with goal programming to simulate the electricity market trading which consists of electricity generators and retailers. Green certificate trading and carbon trading are considered. Our research findings highlight the following key points: (1) As quota obligation increases, the strategy of large capacity generator is to increase wholesale price, while the strategy of small capacity generator is to lower wholesale price and increase electricity production. (2) Interestingly, the profit of generators first increases and then decrease with the quota obligation under independent mechanism. Retailers also maximize their profit when the quota obligation is intermediate. (3) The effectiveness of policies in reducing emissions and promoting the development of renewable energy may be ineffective. The quota obligation may reduce green electricity production, and carbon quotas may also increase thermal power production. The policy effects on different entities with different production technologies also varies significantly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 121951"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of overlapping regulation on the electricity market concerning renewable portfolio standards and carbon emission trading\",\"authors\":\"Fanshuai Hu , Dequn Zhou , Yinghao Pan , Jinghe Sun , Qingyuan Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon emission trading (CET) are considered effective emission reduction policy tools. However, the policy impact will become complex when there is overlapping regulation and an increase in trading entities. To analyze the policy effectiveness, this paper constructs a game model combined with goal programming to simulate the electricity market trading which consists of electricity generators and retailers. Green certificate trading and carbon trading are considered. Our research findings highlight the following key points: (1) As quota obligation increases, the strategy of large capacity generator is to increase wholesale price, while the strategy of small capacity generator is to lower wholesale price and increase electricity production. (2) Interestingly, the profit of generators first increases and then decrease with the quota obligation under independent mechanism. Retailers also maximize their profit when the quota obligation is intermediate. (3) The effectiveness of policies in reducing emissions and promoting the development of renewable energy may be ineffective. The quota obligation may reduce green electricity production, and carbon quotas may also increase thermal power production. The policy effects on different entities with different production technologies also varies significantly.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacts of overlapping regulation on the electricity market concerning renewable portfolio standards and carbon emission trading
The renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and carbon emission trading (CET) are considered effective emission reduction policy tools. However, the policy impact will become complex when there is overlapping regulation and an increase in trading entities. To analyze the policy effectiveness, this paper constructs a game model combined with goal programming to simulate the electricity market trading which consists of electricity generators and retailers. Green certificate trading and carbon trading are considered. Our research findings highlight the following key points: (1) As quota obligation increases, the strategy of large capacity generator is to increase wholesale price, while the strategy of small capacity generator is to lower wholesale price and increase electricity production. (2) Interestingly, the profit of generators first increases and then decrease with the quota obligation under independent mechanism. Retailers also maximize their profit when the quota obligation is intermediate. (3) The effectiveness of policies in reducing emissions and promoting the development of renewable energy may be ineffective. The quota obligation may reduce green electricity production, and carbon quotas may also increase thermal power production. The policy effects on different entities with different production technologies also varies significantly.
期刊介绍:
Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices.
As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.