从甘油中工业化生产三醋精的工艺模拟和经济评估:比较醋酸和醋酸酐作为可能的试剂

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Heitor C. dos Santos, Beatriz E. Stutz, André F. Young
{"title":"从甘油中工业化生产三醋精的工艺模拟和经济评估:比较醋酸和醋酸酐作为可能的试剂","authors":"Heitor C. dos Santos,&nbsp;Beatriz E. Stutz,&nbsp;André F. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this work was to simulate, in Aspen HYSYS® v12.1, the process of obtaining triacetin from glycerol through three chemical routes: via acetic acid (Route 1), acetic anhydride (Route 2), and a combination of acetic acid and acetic anhydride in two separate reactors (Route 3). Additionally and as a novelty, it was investigated the technical and economic viability of a multipurpose plant to this end. It was verified that Route 1 resulted in the best triacetin breakeven prices, even though it would still not be competitive in the considered economic context. On the other hand, Route 2 presented the worst performance due to low conversion (11 %) and higher price of acetic anhydride. The combined route resulted in intermediate breakeven prices for triacetin, despite achieving the highest conversion (79 %) and highest final product purity (96 %). Yield/selectivity and the separation steps were identified as the main bottlenecks in these processes, with reactors and distillation columns accounting for more than 95 % of the equipment costs. The multipurpose plant proved technically possible, and it can be economically interesting depending on the market prices for acetic acid and acetic anhydride.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 121943"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process simulation and economic evaluation of the industrial production of triacetin from glycerol: Comparing acetic acid and acetic anhydride as possible reagents\",\"authors\":\"Heitor C. dos Santos,&nbsp;Beatriz E. Stutz,&nbsp;André F. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective of this work was to simulate, in Aspen HYSYS® v12.1, the process of obtaining triacetin from glycerol through three chemical routes: via acetic acid (Route 1), acetic anhydride (Route 2), and a combination of acetic acid and acetic anhydride in two separate reactors (Route 3). Additionally and as a novelty, it was investigated the technical and economic viability of a multipurpose plant to this end. It was verified that Route 1 resulted in the best triacetin breakeven prices, even though it would still not be competitive in the considered economic context. On the other hand, Route 2 presented the worst performance due to low conversion (11 %) and higher price of acetic anhydride. The combined route resulted in intermediate breakeven prices for triacetin, despite achieving the highest conversion (79 %) and highest final product purity (96 %). Yield/selectivity and the separation steps were identified as the main bottlenecks in these processes, with reactors and distillation columns accounting for more than 95 % of the equipment costs. The multipurpose plant proved technically possible, and it can be economically interesting depending on the market prices for acetic acid and acetic anhydride.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是在 Aspen HYSYS® v12.1 中模拟通过三种化学途径从甘油中获得三醋精的过程:通过醋酸(途径 1)、醋酐(途径 2)以及在两个独立的反应器中结合使用醋酸和醋酐的方法(途径 3)。此外,作为一项创新,还研究了为此目的建立一个多用途工厂的技术和经济可行性。结果表明,路线 1 的三醋精盈亏平衡价格最高,尽管在所考虑的经济背景下,它仍不具有竞争力。另一方面,由于转化率低(11%)和醋酐价格较高,路线 2 的性能最差。联合路线虽然实现了最高的转化率(79%)和最高的最终产品纯度(96%),但三醋精的盈亏平衡价格处于中间水平。产量/选择性和分离步骤被认为是这些工艺的主要瓶颈,反应器和蒸馏塔占设备成本的 95% 以上。事实证明,多用途工厂在技术上是可行的,其经济效益取决于醋酸和醋酸酐的市场价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process simulation and economic evaluation of the industrial production of triacetin from glycerol: Comparing acetic acid and acetic anhydride as possible reagents
The objective of this work was to simulate, in Aspen HYSYS® v12.1, the process of obtaining triacetin from glycerol through three chemical routes: via acetic acid (Route 1), acetic anhydride (Route 2), and a combination of acetic acid and acetic anhydride in two separate reactors (Route 3). Additionally and as a novelty, it was investigated the technical and economic viability of a multipurpose plant to this end. It was verified that Route 1 resulted in the best triacetin breakeven prices, even though it would still not be competitive in the considered economic context. On the other hand, Route 2 presented the worst performance due to low conversion (11 %) and higher price of acetic anhydride. The combined route resulted in intermediate breakeven prices for triacetin, despite achieving the highest conversion (79 %) and highest final product purity (96 %). Yield/selectivity and the separation steps were identified as the main bottlenecks in these processes, with reactors and distillation columns accounting for more than 95 % of the equipment costs. The multipurpose plant proved technically possible, and it can be economically interesting depending on the market prices for acetic acid and acetic anhydride.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信