肺癌患者免疫相关不良事件自我报告症状清单的开发与验证

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tiantian Fan , Siying Zhu , Hong Wang , Yan Dong , Ying Zhou , Yalan Song , Shan Pan , Qiujuan Wu , Graeme Drummond Smith , Yumei Li , Yuan Han
{"title":"肺癌患者免疫相关不良事件自我报告症状清单的开发与验证","authors":"Tiantian Fan ,&nbsp;Siying Zhu ,&nbsp;Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Dong ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Yalan Song ,&nbsp;Shan Pan ,&nbsp;Qiujuan Wu ,&nbsp;Graeme Drummond Smith ,&nbsp;Yumei Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Han","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to develop and validate the Self-Report Symptom Inventory of immune-related Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer (SRSI-irAEs-LC) to allow for systematic assessment of symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sequential two-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. In phase I, a draft version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC was constructed through item generation and draft inventory construction. Delphi expert consultation, cognitive interviews and a pilot study were conducted to evaluate the content validity and refine the scale. In phase II, psychometric testing was performed on 512 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity, discriminant validity, and reliability evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through 5 sequential steps in phase I, the preliminary version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC comprised 10 dimensions with 41 items. Through EFA, the final version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC included 8 dimensions and 26 items that explained 62.33% of the variance. The CFA model showed that the 8-factor model fitted the data well. Good criteria validity and known-groups discriminant validity were demonstrated. Cronbach's <em>alpha</em>, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.824, 0.725, and 0.851, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preliminarily, the SRSI-irAEs-LC is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Further research is needed to confirm its generalizability to a broader population as well as its validity and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"11 12","pages":"Article 100603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the self-report symptom inventory of immune-related adverse events in patients with lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tiantian Fan ,&nbsp;Siying Zhu ,&nbsp;Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Yan Dong ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Yalan Song ,&nbsp;Shan Pan ,&nbsp;Qiujuan Wu ,&nbsp;Graeme Drummond Smith ,&nbsp;Yumei Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to develop and validate the Self-Report Symptom Inventory of immune-related Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer (SRSI-irAEs-LC) to allow for systematic assessment of symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sequential two-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. In phase I, a draft version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC was constructed through item generation and draft inventory construction. Delphi expert consultation, cognitive interviews and a pilot study were conducted to evaluate the content validity and refine the scale. In phase II, psychometric testing was performed on 512 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity, discriminant validity, and reliability evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through 5 sequential steps in phase I, the preliminary version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC comprised 10 dimensions with 41 items. Through EFA, the final version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC included 8 dimensions and 26 items that explained 62.33% of the variance. The CFA model showed that the 8-factor model fitted the data well. Good criteria validity and known-groups discriminant validity were demonstrated. Cronbach's <em>alpha</em>, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.824, 0.725, and 0.851, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preliminarily, the SRSI-irAEs-LC is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Further research is needed to confirm its generalizability to a broader population as well as its validity and reliability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524002257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524002257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在开发和验证肺癌患者免疫相关不良事件症状自评量表(SRSI-irAEs-LC),以便对接受程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的肺癌患者的症状性irAEs进行系统评估。在第一阶段,通过项目生成和构建清单草案,构建了SRSI-irAEs-LC的草案版本。通过德尔菲专家咨询、认知访谈和试点研究,对量表的内容效度进行了评估和完善。在第二阶段,采用项目分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)、确证性因子分析(CFA)、标准效度、判别效度和信度评价等方法,对512名接受PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs治疗的肺癌患者进行了心理测验。通过 EFA,SRSI-irAEs-LC 的最终版本包括 8 个维度和 26 个项目,解释了 62.33% 的方差。CFA 模型显示,8 因子模型很好地拟合了数据。良好的标准效度和已知组别判别效度也得到了证实。量表的Cronbach's alpha、分裂半信度和测试-再测信度分别为0.824、0.725和0.851。结论初步认为,SRSI-irAEs-LC是评估接受PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs治疗的肺癌患者症状性irAEs的有效、可靠的工具。还需要进一步的研究来确认其在更广泛人群中的通用性及其有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of the self-report symptom inventory of immune-related adverse events in patients with lung cancer

Objective

This study aims to develop and validate the Self-Report Symptom Inventory of immune-related Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer (SRSI-irAEs-LC) to allow for systematic assessment of symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

A sequential two-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. In phase I, a draft version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC was constructed through item generation and draft inventory construction. Delphi expert consultation, cognitive interviews and a pilot study were conducted to evaluate the content validity and refine the scale. In phase II, psychometric testing was performed on 512 patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity, discriminant validity, and reliability evaluations.

Results

Through 5 sequential steps in phase I, the preliminary version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC comprised 10 dimensions with 41 items. Through EFA, the final version of the SRSI-irAEs-LC included 8 dimensions and 26 items that explained 62.33% of the variance. The CFA model showed that the 8-factor model fitted the data well. Good criteria validity and known-groups discriminant validity were demonstrated. Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.824, 0.725, and 0.851, respectively.

Conclusions

Preliminarily, the SRSI-irAEs-LC is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptomatic irAEs in patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Further research is needed to confirm its generalizability to a broader population as well as its validity and reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信