Yunyun Dai , Jinfeng Ding , Barbara A. Daveson , Yongyi Chen , Alanna Connolly , Claire E. Johnson
{"title":"验证中国癌症姑息治疗的表现状态和日常生活活动评估工具:跨文化心理测量研究","authors":"Yunyun Dai , Jinfeng Ding , Barbara A. Daveson , Yongyi Chen , Alanna Connolly , Claire E. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>National approaches to the routine assessment of palliative care patients improve patient outcomes. However, validated tools and a national methodology for this are lacking in Mainland China. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) model is a well-established national program aimed at improving the quality of palliative care based on point-of-care outcomes assessment. This study aimed to culturally adapt and validate two measures used in PCOC (Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status [AKPS], Resource Utilization Groups - Activities of Daily Living [RUG-ADL]) in the Chinese context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study involving forward and backward translation methods, cognitive interviewing, and psychometric testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two minor adjustments were made to the scoring instructions for the RUG-ADL, and the AKPS remained unchanged. Twenty-two clinicians participated in psychometric testing, completing 363 paired assessments on 135 inpatients. The correlations between AKPS and the Barthel index (BI) for activities of daily living (<em>r</em> = 0.77, <em>P</em> < 0.001), AKPS and RUG-ADL (<em>r</em> = −0.82, <em>P</em> < 0.001), RUG-ADL and BI (<em>r</em> = −0.67 to −0.76) demonstrated good concurrent validity for both the AKPS and the RUG-ADL. The inter-rater reliability for AKPS (<em>k</em> = 0.63) and RUG-ADL were substantial and moderate (<em>k</em> = 0.51–0.56), respectively. The RUG-ADL also showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). Both tools were able to detect patients' urgent needs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Chinese version of AKPS and RUG-ADL can be systematically used to assess performance status and dependency among palliative care patients. However, observational assessments and enhanced communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers is also recommended for optimal clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"11 12","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating performance status and activities of daily living assessment tools for Chinese palliative care in a cancer setting: A cross-cultural psychometric study\",\"authors\":\"Yunyun Dai , Jinfeng Ding , Barbara A. Daveson , Yongyi Chen , Alanna Connolly , Claire E. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>National approaches to the routine assessment of palliative care patients improve patient outcomes. However, validated tools and a national methodology for this are lacking in Mainland China. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) model is a well-established national program aimed at improving the quality of palliative care based on point-of-care outcomes assessment. This study aimed to culturally adapt and validate two measures used in PCOC (Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status [AKPS], Resource Utilization Groups - Activities of Daily Living [RUG-ADL]) in the Chinese context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study involving forward and backward translation methods, cognitive interviewing, and psychometric testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two minor adjustments were made to the scoring instructions for the RUG-ADL, and the AKPS remained unchanged. Twenty-two clinicians participated in psychometric testing, completing 363 paired assessments on 135 inpatients. The correlations between AKPS and the Barthel index (BI) for activities of daily living (<em>r</em> = 0.77, <em>P</em> < 0.001), AKPS and RUG-ADL (<em>r</em> = −0.82, <em>P</em> < 0.001), RUG-ADL and BI (<em>r</em> = −0.67 to −0.76) demonstrated good concurrent validity for both the AKPS and the RUG-ADL. The inter-rater reliability for AKPS (<em>k</em> = 0.63) and RUG-ADL were substantial and moderate (<em>k</em> = 0.51–0.56), respectively. The RUG-ADL also showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). Both tools were able to detect patients' urgent needs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Chinese version of AKPS and RUG-ADL can be systematically used to assess performance status and dependency among palliative care patients. However, observational assessments and enhanced communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers is also recommended for optimal clinical utility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S234756252400235X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S234756252400235X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validating performance status and activities of daily living assessment tools for Chinese palliative care in a cancer setting: A cross-cultural psychometric study
Objective
National approaches to the routine assessment of palliative care patients improve patient outcomes. However, validated tools and a national methodology for this are lacking in Mainland China. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) model is a well-established national program aimed at improving the quality of palliative care based on point-of-care outcomes assessment. This study aimed to culturally adapt and validate two measures used in PCOC (Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status [AKPS], Resource Utilization Groups - Activities of Daily Living [RUG-ADL]) in the Chinese context.
Methods
A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study involving forward and backward translation methods, cognitive interviewing, and psychometric testing.
Results
Two minor adjustments were made to the scoring instructions for the RUG-ADL, and the AKPS remained unchanged. Twenty-two clinicians participated in psychometric testing, completing 363 paired assessments on 135 inpatients. The correlations between AKPS and the Barthel index (BI) for activities of daily living (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), AKPS and RUG-ADL (r = −0.82, P < 0.001), RUG-ADL and BI (r = −0.67 to −0.76) demonstrated good concurrent validity for both the AKPS and the RUG-ADL. The inter-rater reliability for AKPS (k = 0.63) and RUG-ADL were substantial and moderate (k = 0.51–0.56), respectively. The RUG-ADL also showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). Both tools were able to detect patients' urgent needs.
Conclusions
The Chinese version of AKPS and RUG-ADL can be systematically used to assess performance status and dependency among palliative care patients. However, observational assessments and enhanced communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers is also recommended for optimal clinical utility.