Zhaozhao Tang , Davina Vallabh , Yaodong Wang , Ye Huang , Jing-Cheng Han , Yang Zhou , Linlin Wang , Muhammad Ahmad , Maryam Yousaf , Yuchen Wang , Yuefei Huang
{"title":"零净农业:带碳捕获和碳存储的三联供","authors":"Zhaozhao Tang , Davina Vallabh , Yaodong Wang , Ye Huang , Jing-Cheng Han , Yang Zhou , Linlin Wang , Muhammad Ahmad , Maryam Yousaf , Yuchen Wang , Yuefei Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq compared to 299 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 121898"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage\",\"authors\":\"Zhaozhao Tang , Davina Vallabh , Yaodong Wang , Ye Huang , Jing-Cheng Han , Yang Zhou , Linlin Wang , Muhammad Ahmad , Maryam Yousaf , Yuchen Wang , Yuefei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq compared to 299 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019669\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage
Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO2-eq compared to 299 Ton CO2-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices.
As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.