考虑光吸收和棕色碳的光化学漂白,模拟露天生物质燃烧对东南亚地区 O3 和 PM2.5 的影响

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Minsu Choi, Qi Ying
{"title":"考虑光吸收和棕色碳的光化学漂白,模拟露天生物质燃烧对东南亚地区 O3 和 PM2.5 的影响","authors":"Minsu Choi,&nbsp;Qi Ying","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Open biomass burning in Southeast Asia has significant adverse impacts on air quality in the region and in downwind areas. These biomass burning events emit large amounts of light absorbing brown carbon (BrC). Once in the atmosphere, the light absorbing capacity of BrC is reduced by various oxidation processes. However, few modeling studies have been conducted to explicitly examine light absorption and bleaching on the prediction of ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). In this study, a modified Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model that explicitly tracks the concentrations of light absorbing and non-light absorbing organic aerosol components from different emission sources and the bleaching of BrC due to photooxidation and OH oxidation is applied to widespread open biomass burning events in March 2018 in Southeast Asia. Open biomass burning accounts for as much as 20–40 ppb (30–50%) of the maximum daily average 8-h ozone (MDA8 O<sub>3</sub>) and 40–120 μg m<sup>−3</sup> (60–90%) of the daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the emission source regions. Compared to a simulation without BrC light absorption, the predicted MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> are as much as 16 ppb and 16 μg m<sup>−3</sup> lower, respectively, than a simulation with light absorption. This confirms that neglecting the UV light absorption of BrC can lead to significant overpredictions of O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the open biomass burning periods, which may lead to an overestimation of the adverse impacts of biomass burning on public health in Southeast Asia. The addition of BrC bleaching results in a 0.5–1% increase in MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and 1–5% increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> compared to the case without BrC bleaching. The results of this study indicate that light absorption by BrC needs to be considered in chemical transport modeling of large open biomass burning events. The BrC bleaching process is relatively slow and neglecting this process does not significantly change the predictions of MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> during open biomass burning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"342 ","pages":"Article 120942"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the impacts of open biomass burning on regional O3 and PM2.5 in Southeast Asia considering light absorption and photochemical bleaching of Brown carbon\",\"authors\":\"Minsu Choi,&nbsp;Qi Ying\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Open biomass burning in Southeast Asia has significant adverse impacts on air quality in the region and in downwind areas. These biomass burning events emit large amounts of light absorbing brown carbon (BrC). Once in the atmosphere, the light absorbing capacity of BrC is reduced by various oxidation processes. However, few modeling studies have been conducted to explicitly examine light absorption and bleaching on the prediction of ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). In this study, a modified Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model that explicitly tracks the concentrations of light absorbing and non-light absorbing organic aerosol components from different emission sources and the bleaching of BrC due to photooxidation and OH oxidation is applied to widespread open biomass burning events in March 2018 in Southeast Asia. Open biomass burning accounts for as much as 20–40 ppb (30–50%) of the maximum daily average 8-h ozone (MDA8 O<sub>3</sub>) and 40–120 μg m<sup>−3</sup> (60–90%) of the daily average PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the emission source regions. Compared to a simulation without BrC light absorption, the predicted MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> are as much as 16 ppb and 16 μg m<sup>−3</sup> lower, respectively, than a simulation with light absorption. This confirms that neglecting the UV light absorption of BrC can lead to significant overpredictions of O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the open biomass burning periods, which may lead to an overestimation of the adverse impacts of biomass burning on public health in Southeast Asia. The addition of BrC bleaching results in a 0.5–1% increase in MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and 1–5% increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> compared to the case without BrC bleaching. The results of this study indicate that light absorption by BrC needs to be considered in chemical transport modeling of large open biomass burning events. The BrC bleaching process is relatively slow and neglecting this process does not significantly change the predictions of MDA8 O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> during open biomass burning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment\",\"volume\":\"342 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024006174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024006174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

东南亚地区的露天生物质燃烧对该地区和下风向地区的空气质量产生了严重的不利影响。这些生物质燃烧活动排放出大量吸收光的棕碳(BrC)。一旦进入大气,BrC 的光吸收能力就会因各种氧化过程而降低。然而,很少有建模研究明确考察光吸收和漂白对臭氧(O3)和细颗粒物(PM2.5)预测的影响。在本研究中,改进的社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)模型明确跟踪了来自不同排放源的光吸收和非光吸收有机气溶胶成分的浓度,以及光氧化和OH氧化导致的BrC漂白,并将其应用于2018年3月东南亚大范围的露天生物质燃烧事件。在排放源区域,露天生物质燃烧造成的最大日均 8 小时臭氧(MDA8 O3)和日均 PM2.5 分别高达 20-40 ppb(30%-50%)和 40-120 μg m-3(60%-90%)。与没有吸收 BrC 光的模拟相比,预测的 MDA8 O3 和 PM2.5 分别比有吸收光的模拟低 16 ppb 和 16 μg m-3 之多。这证实,忽略 BrC 的紫外光吸收会导致对露天生物质燃烧期间的 O3 和 PM2.5 的预测严重偏高,从而可能导致高估生物质燃烧对东南亚公众健康的不利影响。与不添加漂白剂的情况相比,添加漂白剂会导致 MDA8 O3 增加 0.5-1%,PM2.5 增加 1-5%。这项研究的结果表明,在大型露天生物质燃烧事件的化学传输模型中需要考虑 BrC 的光吸收。BrC 漂白过程相对较慢,忽略这一过程不会显著改变露天生物质燃烧过程中 MDA8 O3 和 PM2.5 的预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling the impacts of open biomass burning on regional O3 and PM2.5 in Southeast Asia considering light absorption and photochemical bleaching of Brown carbon
Open biomass burning in Southeast Asia has significant adverse impacts on air quality in the region and in downwind areas. These biomass burning events emit large amounts of light absorbing brown carbon (BrC). Once in the atmosphere, the light absorbing capacity of BrC is reduced by various oxidation processes. However, few modeling studies have been conducted to explicitly examine light absorption and bleaching on the prediction of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In this study, a modified Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model that explicitly tracks the concentrations of light absorbing and non-light absorbing organic aerosol components from different emission sources and the bleaching of BrC due to photooxidation and OH oxidation is applied to widespread open biomass burning events in March 2018 in Southeast Asia. Open biomass burning accounts for as much as 20–40 ppb (30–50%) of the maximum daily average 8-h ozone (MDA8 O3) and 40–120 μg m−3 (60–90%) of the daily average PM2.5 in the emission source regions. Compared to a simulation without BrC light absorption, the predicted MDA8 O3 and PM2.5 are as much as 16 ppb and 16 μg m−3 lower, respectively, than a simulation with light absorption. This confirms that neglecting the UV light absorption of BrC can lead to significant overpredictions of O3 and PM2.5 during the open biomass burning periods, which may lead to an overestimation of the adverse impacts of biomass burning on public health in Southeast Asia. The addition of BrC bleaching results in a 0.5–1% increase in MDA8 O3 and 1–5% increase in PM2.5 compared to the case without BrC bleaching. The results of this study indicate that light absorption by BrC needs to be considered in chemical transport modeling of large open biomass burning events. The BrC bleaching process is relatively slow and neglecting this process does not significantly change the predictions of MDA8 O3 and PM2.5 during open biomass burning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信