英国公众对供热脱碳的看法:意识、价值观和社交圈效应

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
William Smith , Christina Demski , Nicholas Pidgeon
{"title":"英国公众对供热脱碳的看法:意识、价值观和社交圈效应","authors":"William Smith ,&nbsp;Christina Demski ,&nbsp;Nicholas Pidgeon","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decarbonisation of domestic heating is essential for the UK to achieve net zero carbon emissions, but requires significant changes in domestic infrastructure. Public participation plays a pivotal role in this transition, yet public attitudes towards decarbonised heating remain under-researched and poorly understood.</div><div>We report a nationally representative online survey of 2226 individuals in Great Britain. The survey explored attitudes to three decarbonised heating technologies currently being trialled or entering the market: heat pumps, hydrogen heating, and district heating networks. A wide dataset of interrelated variables was collected, including heating system preference and usage, knowledge and support for decarbonised heating, environmental and energy security concerns, perceptions of trust and responsibility, financial considerations, and many others.</div><div>Central to the study were two methodological innovations; an informed choice decision pathway element designed to investigate key factors underlying personal willingness to adopt each technology, and a psychometric network modelling approach that allowed deep exploration of the structural and dynamic properties of attitudes to decarbonised heating.</div><div>Findings indicated that the majority of respondents had were aware and supportive towards decarbonised heating, particularly towards heat pumps. However, knowledge of these technologies was limited. Government and energy actors were seen as somewhat untrustworthy but ultimately responsible for funding the transition, and respondents supported policies emphasising government responsibility.</div><div>When informed, respondent's willingness to adopt decarbonised heating technologies appeared resistant to change, and not strongly influenced any key factors. However, network modelling estimated normative social forces (‘social circle’ effect) were highly influential in shaping attitudes to decarbonised heating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103844"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public perceptions of heat decarbonisation in Great Britain: Awareness, values and the social circle effect\",\"authors\":\"William Smith ,&nbsp;Christina Demski ,&nbsp;Nicholas Pidgeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The decarbonisation of domestic heating is essential for the UK to achieve net zero carbon emissions, but requires significant changes in domestic infrastructure. Public participation plays a pivotal role in this transition, yet public attitudes towards decarbonised heating remain under-researched and poorly understood.</div><div>We report a nationally representative online survey of 2226 individuals in Great Britain. The survey explored attitudes to three decarbonised heating technologies currently being trialled or entering the market: heat pumps, hydrogen heating, and district heating networks. A wide dataset of interrelated variables was collected, including heating system preference and usage, knowledge and support for decarbonised heating, environmental and energy security concerns, perceptions of trust and responsibility, financial considerations, and many others.</div><div>Central to the study were two methodological innovations; an informed choice decision pathway element designed to investigate key factors underlying personal willingness to adopt each technology, and a psychometric network modelling approach that allowed deep exploration of the structural and dynamic properties of attitudes to decarbonised heating.</div><div>Findings indicated that the majority of respondents had were aware and supportive towards decarbonised heating, particularly towards heat pumps. However, knowledge of these technologies was limited. Government and energy actors were seen as somewhat untrustworthy but ultimately responsible for funding the transition, and respondents supported policies emphasising government responsibility.</div><div>When informed, respondent's willingness to adopt decarbonised heating technologies appeared resistant to change, and not strongly influenced any key factors. However, network modelling estimated normative social forces (‘social circle’ effect) were highly influential in shaping attitudes to decarbonised heating.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103844\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004353\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭供暖的去碳化对于英国实现净零碳排放至关重要,但需要对家庭基础设施进行重大改造。公众参与在这一转变中起着关键作用,但公众对去碳化供暖的态度仍然研究不足,了解甚少。我们报告了在大不列颠进行的具有全国代表性的在线调查,调查对象为 2226 名个人。调查探讨了人们对目前正在试用或即将进入市场的三种去碳化供热技术的态度:热泵、氢供热和区域供热网络。调查收集了大量相互关联的变量数据,包括供热系统的偏好和使用、对去碳化供热的了解和支持、对环境和能源安全的关注、对信任和责任的看法、财务因素等。研究的核心是两个方法上的创新:一个是旨在调查个人采用每种技术意愿的关键因素的知情选择决策路径要素,另一个是可深入探讨对低碳供暖态度的结构和动态特性的心理测量网络建模方法。研究结果表明,大多数受访者都了解并支持低碳供暖,尤其是热泵。然而,受访者对这些技术的了解有限。受访者认为政府和能源部门在某种程度上不可信,但最终有责任为过渡提供资金,受访者支持强调政府责任的政策。在了解情况后,受访者采用低碳化供热技术的意愿似乎难以改变,并且不受任何关键因素的强烈影响。然而,根据网络建模估计,规范性社会力量("社会圈 "效应)在影响人们对低碳供暖的态度方面具有很大影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public perceptions of heat decarbonisation in Great Britain: Awareness, values and the social circle effect
The decarbonisation of domestic heating is essential for the UK to achieve net zero carbon emissions, but requires significant changes in domestic infrastructure. Public participation plays a pivotal role in this transition, yet public attitudes towards decarbonised heating remain under-researched and poorly understood.
We report a nationally representative online survey of 2226 individuals in Great Britain. The survey explored attitudes to three decarbonised heating technologies currently being trialled or entering the market: heat pumps, hydrogen heating, and district heating networks. A wide dataset of interrelated variables was collected, including heating system preference and usage, knowledge and support for decarbonised heating, environmental and energy security concerns, perceptions of trust and responsibility, financial considerations, and many others.
Central to the study were two methodological innovations; an informed choice decision pathway element designed to investigate key factors underlying personal willingness to adopt each technology, and a psychometric network modelling approach that allowed deep exploration of the structural and dynamic properties of attitudes to decarbonised heating.
Findings indicated that the majority of respondents had were aware and supportive towards decarbonised heating, particularly towards heat pumps. However, knowledge of these technologies was limited. Government and energy actors were seen as somewhat untrustworthy but ultimately responsible for funding the transition, and respondents supported policies emphasising government responsibility.
When informed, respondent's willingness to adopt decarbonised heating technologies appeared resistant to change, and not strongly influenced any key factors. However, network modelling estimated normative social forces (‘social circle’ effect) were highly influential in shaping attitudes to decarbonised heating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信