象征意义何时最重要?通过在美国两个城市开展调查探究电动汽车的采用意向

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Atar Herziger , Andre L. Carrel , Nicole Sintov
{"title":"象征意义何时最重要?通过在美国两个城市开展调查探究电动汽车的采用意向","authors":"Atar Herziger ,&nbsp;Andre L. Carrel ,&nbsp;Nicole Sintov","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Perceptions that Electric Vehicles (EVs) hold symbolic value— expressing the owners' identity, values, and status—are positively associated with willingness to purchase an EV. However, is this relationship between symbolic value and purchase intent fixed over time or does it change as the purchase decision draws nearer? In two cross-sectional survey studies, we assess whether and how purchase timing moderates the association between EV symbolic value and adoption intent. Study 1 (N = 565; Columbus, Ohio) finds symbolic value is more closely related to EV adoption intent when a purchase decision is near in time. Study 2 (N = 709; Los Angeles, California) replicates these findings and yields evidence of symbolic value as a mechanism. Specifically, the association between EV symbolic value and identity is stronger among individuals nearer to a purchase decision. This identity-enhanced symbolism, in turn, is positively associated with EV adoption intent. Though our samples were relatively small to detect moderation, this work provides initial evidence that the relationship between symbolic value and adoption intent is stronger when individuals are near (vs. distant) in time to a vehicle purchase decision. We employ two psychological theories, Identity-Based Motivation Theory and Construal Level Theory, to interpret our findings and suggest that an identity-based motivational pull toward products may be partly explained by enhanced symbolic value as one nears a product purchase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103818"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When does symbolism matter most? Exploring electric vehicle adoption intent through surveys in two United States cities\",\"authors\":\"Atar Herziger ,&nbsp;Andre L. Carrel ,&nbsp;Nicole Sintov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Perceptions that Electric Vehicles (EVs) hold symbolic value— expressing the owners' identity, values, and status—are positively associated with willingness to purchase an EV. However, is this relationship between symbolic value and purchase intent fixed over time or does it change as the purchase decision draws nearer? In two cross-sectional survey studies, we assess whether and how purchase timing moderates the association between EV symbolic value and adoption intent. Study 1 (N = 565; Columbus, Ohio) finds symbolic value is more closely related to EV adoption intent when a purchase decision is near in time. Study 2 (N = 709; Los Angeles, California) replicates these findings and yields evidence of symbolic value as a mechanism. Specifically, the association between EV symbolic value and identity is stronger among individuals nearer to a purchase decision. This identity-enhanced symbolism, in turn, is positively associated with EV adoption intent. Though our samples were relatively small to detect moderation, this work provides initial evidence that the relationship between symbolic value and adoption intent is stronger when individuals are near (vs. distant) in time to a vehicle purchase decision. We employ two psychological theories, Identity-Based Motivation Theory and Construal Level Theory, to interpret our findings and suggest that an identity-based motivational pull toward products may be partly explained by enhanced symbolic value as one nears a product purchase.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004092\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认为电动汽车(EV)具有象征性价值--表达了车主的身份、价值观和地位--与购买电动汽车的意愿呈正相关。然而,象征性价值与购买意愿之间的这种关系是随着时间的推移而固定不变,还是随着购买决策的临近而发生变化?在两项横截面调查研究中,我们评估了购买时机是否以及如何调节电动汽车象征性价值与采用意向之间的关系。研究 1(N = 565;俄亥俄州哥伦布市)发现,当购买决策的时间临近时,象征性价值与电动汽车采用意向的关系更为密切。研究 2(N = 709;加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市)重复了这些发现,并得出了象征性价值作为一种机制的证据。具体来说,在临近做出购买决策的个体中,电动汽车象征性价值与身份之间的关联性更强。这种身份认同增强的象征意义反过来又与电动汽车的采用意向正相关。虽然我们的样本相对较小,无法检测出调节作用,但这项工作提供了初步证据,证明当个体在时间上接近(而不是远离)车辆购买决策时,象征性价值与采用意向之间的关系更强。我们运用了两种心理学理论--基于身份的动机理论和构象水平理论--来解释我们的研究结果,并提出基于身份的动机对产品的拉动作用可以部分地通过临近购买产品时象征性价值的增强来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When does symbolism matter most? Exploring electric vehicle adoption intent through surveys in two United States cities
Perceptions that Electric Vehicles (EVs) hold symbolic value— expressing the owners' identity, values, and status—are positively associated with willingness to purchase an EV. However, is this relationship between symbolic value and purchase intent fixed over time or does it change as the purchase decision draws nearer? In two cross-sectional survey studies, we assess whether and how purchase timing moderates the association between EV symbolic value and adoption intent. Study 1 (N = 565; Columbus, Ohio) finds symbolic value is more closely related to EV adoption intent when a purchase decision is near in time. Study 2 (N = 709; Los Angeles, California) replicates these findings and yields evidence of symbolic value as a mechanism. Specifically, the association between EV symbolic value and identity is stronger among individuals nearer to a purchase decision. This identity-enhanced symbolism, in turn, is positively associated with EV adoption intent. Though our samples were relatively small to detect moderation, this work provides initial evidence that the relationship between symbolic value and adoption intent is stronger when individuals are near (vs. distant) in time to a vehicle purchase decision. We employ two psychological theories, Identity-Based Motivation Theory and Construal Level Theory, to interpret our findings and suggest that an identity-based motivational pull toward products may be partly explained by enhanced symbolic value as one nears a product purchase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信