喂养僵尸植物:美国的生物质争夺战

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Irina Costache , Regine A. Spector
{"title":"喂养僵尸植物:美国的生物质争夺战","authors":"Irina Costache ,&nbsp;Regine A. Spector","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In early 2008, limited liability corporation Palmer Renewable Energy submitted a proposal to the state of Massachusetts to build a new biomass power plant in Springfield, an environmental justice community where many residents identify as low-income and people of color. This article elucidates the complex and intertwining legal, political, and policy avenues that corporations use to advance their interests under the guise of promoting renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions. As this case demonstrates, the fate of public health and environmental protection lies in often ambiguous and contested definitions of what is renewable, what counts as an incinerator, and who has standing and prosecutorial discretion. Based on interviews with key activists, lawyers, and officials, combined with readings of articles, reports, and lawsuits, we uncover the mechanisms through which this company sought to advance corporate profit interests amidst increasing pressure from state and regional climate initiatives aiming to accelerate decarbonization of electric generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103816"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding the zombie plant: The struggle over biomass in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Irina Costache ,&nbsp;Regine A. Spector\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In early 2008, limited liability corporation Palmer Renewable Energy submitted a proposal to the state of Massachusetts to build a new biomass power plant in Springfield, an environmental justice community where many residents identify as low-income and people of color. This article elucidates the complex and intertwining legal, political, and policy avenues that corporations use to advance their interests under the guise of promoting renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions. As this case demonstrates, the fate of public health and environmental protection lies in often ambiguous and contested definitions of what is renewable, what counts as an incinerator, and who has standing and prosecutorial discretion. Based on interviews with key activists, lawyers, and officials, combined with readings of articles, reports, and lawsuits, we uncover the mechanisms through which this company sought to advance corporate profit interests amidst increasing pressure from state and regional climate initiatives aiming to accelerate decarbonization of electric generation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2008 年初,有限责任公司帕尔默可再生能源公司向马萨诸塞州政府提交了一份提案,计划在斯普林菲尔德新建一座生物质发电厂,斯普林菲尔德是一个环境正义社区,许多居民被认定为低收入者和有色人种。这篇文章阐明了企业打着推广可再生能源和减少碳排放的幌子,利用复杂交织的法律、政治和政策途径来促进自身利益。正如该案例所表明的,公共健康和环境保护的命运往往取决于对什么是可再生能源、什么算作焚化炉以及谁有资格和起诉裁量权等定义的模糊性和争议性。基于对主要活动家、律师和官员的访谈,结合对文章、报告和诉讼的解读,我们揭示了这家公司在来自州和地区气候倡议的日益增长的压力下寻求推进企业利润利益的机制,这些倡议旨在加速发电的去碳化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeding the zombie plant: The struggle over biomass in the United States
In early 2008, limited liability corporation Palmer Renewable Energy submitted a proposal to the state of Massachusetts to build a new biomass power plant in Springfield, an environmental justice community where many residents identify as low-income and people of color. This article elucidates the complex and intertwining legal, political, and policy avenues that corporations use to advance their interests under the guise of promoting renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions. As this case demonstrates, the fate of public health and environmental protection lies in often ambiguous and contested definitions of what is renewable, what counts as an incinerator, and who has standing and prosecutorial discretion. Based on interviews with key activists, lawyers, and officials, combined with readings of articles, reports, and lawsuits, we uncover the mechanisms through which this company sought to advance corporate profit interests amidst increasing pressure from state and regional climate initiatives aiming to accelerate decarbonization of electric generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信