{"title":"乙型肝炎流行地区肝恶性肿瘤和非肝恶性肿瘤在免疫检查点抑制剂治疗期间发生的肝脏事件","authors":"Yi‐Ping Hung, Pei‐Chang Lee, Yen‐Hwa Chang, Muh‐Hwa Yang, Chao‐Hua Chiu, Ming‐Huang Chen, Keng‐Hsin Lan, I‐Cheng Lee, Ming‐Chih Hou, Yee Chao, Yi‐Hsiang Huang","doi":"10.1111/apt.18403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundNotable advances have been made in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer treatment. However, the adverse effects of ICIs, especially hepatotoxicity, remain a challenging problem. Whether patients in hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐endemic areas are prone to developing hepatic adverse events during ICI treatment warrants further exploration.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, the data of all patients with cancer who received ICI treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of and risk factors for hepatic adverse events, including hepatitis flare, immune‐related hepatitis (irHepatitis) and HBV reactivation (HBVr), were analysed through a Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsA total of 1283 patients with cancer (190 hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] patients and 1093 patients with non‐HCC malignancies) were eligible for analysis, of whom 283 (22.1%) were HBsAg‐positive. The incidence of hepatitis flare events of any grade was significantly higher in HCC patients than in non‐HCC patients (45.8% vs. 25.6%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). HCC and baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 40 U/L were independent risk factors for ≥ grade 3 hepatitis flare events. No difference was observed in irHepatitis risk between HCC patients and non‐HCC patients. ALT > 40 U/L was an independent risk factor for irHepatitis. Among 283 HBsAg‐positive patients, six patients (2.1%) experienced HBVr. HCC patients had a higher risk of HBVr than non‐HCC patients (4.4% vs. 0.6%). No specific risk factor for HBVr could be identified. However, none of the patients under nucleos/tide analogue (NUC) prophylaxis experienced HBVr in this study.ConclusionsUnder ICI treatment, HCC patients had a higher risk of hepatitis flare events than non‐HCC patients. Abnormal baseline ALT levels are a risk factor for hepatic adverse events. NUC prophylaxis can minimise the risk of HBVr.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatic Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Between Liver and Non‐Liver Malignancies in Hepatitis B Endemic Areas\",\"authors\":\"Yi‐Ping Hung, Pei‐Chang Lee, Yen‐Hwa Chang, Muh‐Hwa Yang, Chao‐Hua Chiu, Ming‐Huang Chen, Keng‐Hsin Lan, I‐Cheng Lee, Ming‐Chih Hou, Yee Chao, Yi‐Hsiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.18403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundNotable advances have been made in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer treatment. However, the adverse effects of ICIs, especially hepatotoxicity, remain a challenging problem. Whether patients in hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐endemic areas are prone to developing hepatic adverse events during ICI treatment warrants further exploration.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, the data of all patients with cancer who received ICI treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of and risk factors for hepatic adverse events, including hepatitis flare, immune‐related hepatitis (irHepatitis) and HBV reactivation (HBVr), were analysed through a Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsA total of 1283 patients with cancer (190 hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] patients and 1093 patients with non‐HCC malignancies) were eligible for analysis, of whom 283 (22.1%) were HBsAg‐positive. The incidence of hepatitis flare events of any grade was significantly higher in HCC patients than in non‐HCC patients (45.8% vs. 25.6%, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001). HCC and baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 40 U/L were independent risk factors for ≥ grade 3 hepatitis flare events. No difference was observed in irHepatitis risk between HCC patients and non‐HCC patients. ALT > 40 U/L was an independent risk factor for irHepatitis. Among 283 HBsAg‐positive patients, six patients (2.1%) experienced HBVr. HCC patients had a higher risk of HBVr than non‐HCC patients (4.4% vs. 0.6%). No specific risk factor for HBVr could be identified. However, none of the patients under nucleos/tide analogue (NUC) prophylaxis experienced HBVr in this study.ConclusionsUnder ICI treatment, HCC patients had a higher risk of hepatitis flare events than non‐HCC patients. Abnormal baseline ALT levels are a risk factor for hepatic adverse events. NUC prophylaxis can minimise the risk of HBVr.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18403\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hepatic Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Between Liver and Non‐Liver Malignancies in Hepatitis B Endemic Areas
BackgroundNotable advances have been made in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer treatment. However, the adverse effects of ICIs, especially hepatotoxicity, remain a challenging problem. Whether patients in hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐endemic areas are prone to developing hepatic adverse events during ICI treatment warrants further exploration.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2020, the data of all patients with cancer who received ICI treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of and risk factors for hepatic adverse events, including hepatitis flare, immune‐related hepatitis (irHepatitis) and HBV reactivation (HBVr), were analysed through a Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsA total of 1283 patients with cancer (190 hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] patients and 1093 patients with non‐HCC malignancies) were eligible for analysis, of whom 283 (22.1%) were HBsAg‐positive. The incidence of hepatitis flare events of any grade was significantly higher in HCC patients than in non‐HCC patients (45.8% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001). HCC and baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 40 U/L were independent risk factors for ≥ grade 3 hepatitis flare events. No difference was observed in irHepatitis risk between HCC patients and non‐HCC patients. ALT > 40 U/L was an independent risk factor for irHepatitis. Among 283 HBsAg‐positive patients, six patients (2.1%) experienced HBVr. HCC patients had a higher risk of HBVr than non‐HCC patients (4.4% vs. 0.6%). No specific risk factor for HBVr could be identified. However, none of the patients under nucleos/tide analogue (NUC) prophylaxis experienced HBVr in this study.ConclusionsUnder ICI treatment, HCC patients had a higher risk of hepatitis flare events than non‐HCC patients. Abnormal baseline ALT levels are a risk factor for hepatic adverse events. NUC prophylaxis can minimise the risk of HBVr.
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.