{"title":"利用阈值峰值模型和特别制定的枢轴量估算设计降雨量的不确定性分析","authors":"Weiqiang Zheng , Shuguang Liu , Zhengzheng Zhou , Yiping Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncertainties associated with the estimated design rainfall depths are difficult to quantify, especially if the uncertainties of the threshold used in the traditional peaks-over-threshold model need to be quantified and included. In this paper, we propose a data-based framework to quantify all the sources of uncertainties associated with the estimation of design rainfall. Three pivotal quantities are formulated to assess the uncertainties of parameters used in generalized Pareto distributions. The frequency distributions of thresholds are determined based on goodness-of-fit tests. The proposed framework is applied at 42 precipitation stations in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Interval estimates of distribution parameters and design rainfall depths are obtained at these stations. The results show that the spatial distributions of the parameter uncertainties are complex. At some areas, the design rainfall depths and their uncertainties are both high, leading to poor reliability of estimated design rainfall depths. Compared with the conventional bootstrap and Bayesian methods, the pivotal quantity method can provide more reliable results on the estimations of the joint distributions of parameters. The proposed framework is demonstrated to be useful and effective for all the 42 stations and is recommended for use in other areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"647 ","pages":"Article 132379"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty analysis for design rainfall estimation using peaks-over-threshold model and specially formulated pivotal quantities\",\"authors\":\"Weiqiang Zheng , Shuguang Liu , Zhengzheng Zhou , Yiping Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Uncertainties associated with the estimated design rainfall depths are difficult to quantify, especially if the uncertainties of the threshold used in the traditional peaks-over-threshold model need to be quantified and included. In this paper, we propose a data-based framework to quantify all the sources of uncertainties associated with the estimation of design rainfall. Three pivotal quantities are formulated to assess the uncertainties of parameters used in generalized Pareto distributions. The frequency distributions of thresholds are determined based on goodness-of-fit tests. The proposed framework is applied at 42 precipitation stations in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Interval estimates of distribution parameters and design rainfall depths are obtained at these stations. The results show that the spatial distributions of the parameter uncertainties are complex. At some areas, the design rainfall depths and their uncertainties are both high, leading to poor reliability of estimated design rainfall depths. Compared with the conventional bootstrap and Bayesian methods, the pivotal quantity method can provide more reliable results on the estimations of the joint distributions of parameters. The proposed framework is demonstrated to be useful and effective for all the 42 stations and is recommended for use in other areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"647 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942401775X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942401775X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncertainty analysis for design rainfall estimation using peaks-over-threshold model and specially formulated pivotal quantities
Uncertainties associated with the estimated design rainfall depths are difficult to quantify, especially if the uncertainties of the threshold used in the traditional peaks-over-threshold model need to be quantified and included. In this paper, we propose a data-based framework to quantify all the sources of uncertainties associated with the estimation of design rainfall. Three pivotal quantities are formulated to assess the uncertainties of parameters used in generalized Pareto distributions. The frequency distributions of thresholds are determined based on goodness-of-fit tests. The proposed framework is applied at 42 precipitation stations in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Interval estimates of distribution parameters and design rainfall depths are obtained at these stations. The results show that the spatial distributions of the parameter uncertainties are complex. At some areas, the design rainfall depths and their uncertainties are both high, leading to poor reliability of estimated design rainfall depths. Compared with the conventional bootstrap and Bayesian methods, the pivotal quantity method can provide more reliable results on the estimations of the joint distributions of parameters. The proposed framework is demonstrated to be useful and effective for all the 42 stations and is recommended for use in other areas.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.