SMART线圈治疗脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani
{"title":"SMART线圈治疗脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani","doi":"10.1177/19714009241303095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241303095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety and efficiency of SMART coil for brain aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241303095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009241303095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SMART 线圈系统是相对较新的一代栓塞线圈,由一个裸铂线圈、一个分离推杆和一个分离手柄组成。本研究调查了 SMART 线圈系统治疗脑动脉瘤的安全性和效率:方法:检索PubMed/Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus,直至2023年10月1日。结果:共纳入 7 项研究:结果:共纳入 7 项研究。我们的研究结果显示,动脉瘤完全闭塞率(mRRC1)为 45%(95% CI,0.35-0.56),动脉瘤颈部残余率(mRRC2)为 36%(95% CI,0.30-0.42),动脉瘤残余率(mRRC3)为 22%(95% CI,0.12-0.38)。此外,考虑到最长的随访时间,我们的研究显示动脉瘤完全闭塞(mRRC1)率为 66%(95% CI,0.43-0.84),颈部残余动脉瘤(mRRC2)率为 27%(95% CI,0.13-0.49),残余动脉瘤(mRRC3)率为 9%(95% CI,0.04-0.20)。此外,再通率和再治疗率分别为10%(95% CI,0.06-0.17)和9%(95% CI,0.06-0.12)。不良和严重不良事件发生率分别为 9%(95% CI,0.07-0.10)和 6%(95% CI,0.01-0.22)。三项研究报告的中风率为 2%(95% CI,0.00-0.13),五项研究报告的死亡率为 6%(95% CI,0.03-0.11):研究结果表明,与其他可用的治疗方法相比,SMART 线圈对颅内动脉瘤患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The safety and efficiency of SMART coil for brain aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.

Method: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.

Results: A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).

Conclusion: The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信