Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani
{"title":"SMART线圈治疗脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani","doi":"10.1177/19714009241303095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241303095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety and efficiency of SMART coil for brain aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Habibi, Mohammad Sina Mirjnani, Rasa Zafari, Zahra Saadat, Bahareh Zahedinasab, Pouria Delbari, Amir Hessam Zare, Amirmahdi Sheipouri, Sheida Mobader Sani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241303095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009241303095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The safety and efficiency of SMART coil for brain aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: The SMART coil system is a relatively new generation of embolic coils consisting of a bare platinum coil, a detachment pusher, and a detachment handle. This study investigated the safety and efficiency of the SMART coil system in treating cerebral aneurysms.
Method: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until October, 1st 2023. Non-English language, non-human studies, and non-original studies were excluded.
Results: A total of 7 studies were included. The results of our study reflected complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 45% (95% CI, 0.35-0.56), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 36% (95% CI, 0.30-0.42), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 22% (95% CI, 0.12-0.38) during post-procedural assessment. Moreover, considering longest follow-up, our study showed complete aneurysm occlusion (mRRC1) rate of 66% (95% CI, 0.43-0.84), neck remnant aneurysm (mRRC2) rate of 27% (95% CI, 0.13-0.49), and residual aneurysm (mRRC3) rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.04-0.20). In addition, recanalization and retreatment rates were reported 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.17) and 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12), respectively. The rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 9% (95% CI, 0.07-0.10) and 6% (95% CI, 0.01-0.22), respectively. Three studies reported a stroke rate which was 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.13), and five studies reported a mortality rate which was 6% (95% CI, 0.03-0.11).
Conclusion: The findings suggested that the SMART coil can be a safe and efficient treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms compared to other available treatment methods.
期刊介绍:
NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.