{"title":"跨女性群体中的前列腺癌筛查和诊断。","authors":"Alex Stephens, Chase Morrison, Jonathan Lutchka, Caleb Richard, Keinnan Hares, Shane Tinsley, Akshay Sood, Briar Shannon, Craig Rogers, Jessica Shill, Nabeel Shakir, Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the frequency and rate at which transfeminine patients receive prostate specific antigen testing compared to a matched cisgender cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with prostates who had encounters in our health system, are currently age 46 or older, and who are alive were included in our study. Transfeminine patients were identified through diagnosis codes and chart review. A 1:5 matched cohort was created based on patient age, race, and area deprivation index. Conditional logistic regression was done to compare odds of receiving any testing and Poisson regression was done to compare the total tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275,112 patients were included in the study, of which 315 were confirmed to be transfeminine. A well matched 1:5 propensity matched cohort was created. Our results suggest that transfeminine patients were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.38, p<0.001) times as likely as cisgender patients to receive at least one PSA test at our institution and received only 32% (95% CI 27%-37%, p <0.001) as many total PSA tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Until more is known about the best practices for PSA testing in the transfeminine population, these patients should receive PSA testing. However, our results suggest that transfeminine patients are significantly less likely to receive any testing and significantly fewer tests in their lifetimes, which may represent a significant healthcare disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnoses in the Transfeminine Population.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Stephens, Chase Morrison, Jonathan Lutchka, Caleb Richard, Keinnan Hares, Shane Tinsley, Akshay Sood, Briar Shannon, Craig Rogers, Jessica Shill, Nabeel Shakir, Firas Abdollah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the frequency and rate at which transfeminine patients receive prostate specific antigen testing compared to a matched cisgender cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with prostates who had encounters in our health system, are currently age 46 or older, and who are alive were included in our study. Transfeminine patients were identified through diagnosis codes and chart review. A 1:5 matched cohort was created based on patient age, race, and area deprivation index. Conditional logistic regression was done to compare odds of receiving any testing and Poisson regression was done to compare the total tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275,112 patients were included in the study, of which 315 were confirmed to be transfeminine. A well matched 1:5 propensity matched cohort was created. Our results suggest that transfeminine patients were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.38, p<0.001) times as likely as cisgender patients to receive at least one PSA test at our institution and received only 32% (95% CI 27%-37%, p <0.001) as many total PSA tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Until more is known about the best practices for PSA testing in the transfeminine population, these patients should receive PSA testing. However, our results suggest that transfeminine patients are significantly less likely to receive any testing and significantly fewer tests in their lifetimes, which may represent a significant healthcare disparity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnoses in the Transfeminine Population.
Objectives: To examine the frequency and rate at which transfeminine patients receive prostate specific antigen testing compared to a matched cisgender cohort.
Methods: Patients with prostates who had encounters in our health system, are currently age 46 or older, and who are alive were included in our study. Transfeminine patients were identified through diagnosis codes and chart review. A 1:5 matched cohort was created based on patient age, race, and area deprivation index. Conditional logistic regression was done to compare odds of receiving any testing and Poisson regression was done to compare the total tests.
Results: A total of 275,112 patients were included in the study, of which 315 were confirmed to be transfeminine. A well matched 1:5 propensity matched cohort was created. Our results suggest that transfeminine patients were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.38, p<0.001) times as likely as cisgender patients to receive at least one PSA test at our institution and received only 32% (95% CI 27%-37%, p <0.001) as many total PSA tests.
Conclusion: Until more is known about the best practices for PSA testing in the transfeminine population, these patients should receive PSA testing. However, our results suggest that transfeminine patients are significantly less likely to receive any testing and significantly fewer tests in their lifetimes, which may represent a significant healthcare disparity.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.