Aashish Kumar, Umer Iqbal, Shafin Bin Amin, Syed Ali Arsal, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Muhammad Saad Shahid, Aimen Naz, Emediong Santhus Asuka
{"title":"评估托伐普坦对心力衰竭和肾功能损害患者的安全性和有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Aashish Kumar, Umer Iqbal, Shafin Bin Amin, Syed Ali Arsal, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Muhammad Saad Shahid, Aimen Naz, Emediong Santhus Asuka","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03778-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"203-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aashish Kumar, Umer Iqbal, Shafin Bin Amin, Syed Ali Arsal, Syed Muhammad Sinaan Ali, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Muhammad Saad Shahid, Aimen Naz, Emediong Santhus Asuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00228-024-03778-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"203-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03778-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03778-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心力衰竭并伴有肾功能损害的患者通常将呋塞米等襻利尿剂作为主要治疗药物。本荟萃分析主要分析肾功能损害合并心衰患者使用托伐普坦这种新方法的安全性和有效性:两名审稿人利用PubMed、Google Scholar和Embase等在线数据库对文章进行了筛选。经过全面的文献检索,筛选出七篇符合所有纳入标准(心力衰竭和肾功能损害患者)的文章进行分析。随后,对各种主要和次要结果进行了评估:我们研究的主要结果包括尿量、肾功能恶化、血尿素氮(BUN)水平和肌酐水平。托伐普坦在增加尿量方面疗效显著,标准化平均差为 2.18(95% CI 0.62-3.75,p = 0.006),并降低了肾功能恶化的发生率,几率比为 0.41(95% CI 0.22-0.77,p = 0.006)。此外,托伐普坦治疗组与常规治疗组在改变血清肌酐水平方面没有显著差异,标准化平均差异为-0.37(95% CI - 0.86至0.12,p = 0.135),但托伐普坦往往会降低血尿素氮水平,与常规治疗组相比,标准化平均差异为-0.18(95% CI - 0.30至-0.06,p = 0.004):虽然托伐普坦的应用与更好的肾脏预后有关,但尚未解决的异质性和各种因素可能会影响我们的研究结果。需要进一步研究评估托伐普坦在这类患者治疗中的作用。
Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.
Methods: Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.
Results: The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.
Conclusion: While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed.
Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor.
Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves
-a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or
-methods that are original in some basic sense, or
-a highly unexpected outcome, or
-conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.