Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruno Barburgian Ramalho Siqueira, Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Patrícia Andrea Monquero
{"title":"评估除草剂对 Lemna minor L. 和 Azolla caroliniana Willd.","authors":"Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruno Barburgian Ramalho Siqueira, Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Patrícia Andrea Monquero","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-residual herbicides can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through surface runoff and leaching. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of indaziflam, sulfentrazone, clomazone, and tebuthiuron on Lemna minor and Azolla caroliniana. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six concentrations of each herbicide across four replicates. The study assessed the concentration causing acute effects in 50% of the organisms (EC<sub>50</sub>), the effects on fresh weight (g), and the risk quotient (RQ). For L. minor, EC<sub>50</sub> values were 0.41, 0.73, 0.12, and 0.21 mg L⁻¹ for clomazone, sulfentrazone, indaziflam, and tebuthiuron, respectively; and for A. caroliniana, the values were 3.26, 0.51, 0.11, and 0.71 mg L⁻¹, respectively. All tested herbicides were classified as highly toxic to macrophyte species, except for clomazone, which was categorized as 'moderately toxic' for A. caroliniana. Moreover, these herbicides significantly reduced fresh weight even at the lowest concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of herbicide toxicity to Lemna minor L. and Azolla caroliniana Willd.\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruno Barburgian Ramalho Siqueira, Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Patrícia Andrea Monquero\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-residual herbicides can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through surface runoff and leaching. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of indaziflam, sulfentrazone, clomazone, and tebuthiuron on Lemna minor and Azolla caroliniana. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six concentrations of each herbicide across four replicates. The study assessed the concentration causing acute effects in 50% of the organisms (EC<sub>50</sub>), the effects on fresh weight (g), and the risk quotient (RQ). For L. minor, EC<sub>50</sub> values were 0.41, 0.73, 0.12, and 0.21 mg L⁻¹ for clomazone, sulfentrazone, indaziflam, and tebuthiuron, respectively; and for A. caroliniana, the values were 3.26, 0.51, 0.11, and 0.71 mg L⁻¹, respectively. All tested herbicides were classified as highly toxic to macrophyte species, except for clomazone, which was categorized as 'moderately toxic' for A. caroliniana. Moreover, these herbicides significantly reduced fresh weight even at the lowest concentrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期残留的除草剂会通过地表径流和沥滤对水生生态系统产生负面影响。本研究评估了茚虫威、磺草酮、氯草酮和特丁噻脲对小百合属(Lemna minor)和红花杜鹃(Azolla caroliniana)的急性毒性。实验在实验室中进行,采用完全随机设计法(CRD),每种除草剂在四个重复中使用六种浓度。研究评估了对 50% 的生物造成急性影响的浓度(EC50)、对鲜重(克)的影响以及风险商数(RQ)。对于 L. minor,氯马酮、磺草酮、茚虫威和特丁硫隆的 EC50 值分别为 0.41、0.73、0.12 和 0.21 mg L-¹;对于 A. caroliniana,EC50 值分别为 3.26、0.51、0.11 和 0.71 mg L-¹。除了氯马隆对 A. caroliniana 的毒性为 "中度 "外,所有测试的除草剂都对大型水草有剧毒。此外,即使浓度最低,这些除草剂也会显著降低鲜重。
Evaluation of herbicide toxicity to Lemna minor L. and Azolla caroliniana Willd.
Long-residual herbicides can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through surface runoff and leaching. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of indaziflam, sulfentrazone, clomazone, and tebuthiuron on Lemna minor and Azolla caroliniana. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six concentrations of each herbicide across four replicates. The study assessed the concentration causing acute effects in 50% of the organisms (EC50), the effects on fresh weight (g), and the risk quotient (RQ). For L. minor, EC50 values were 0.41, 0.73, 0.12, and 0.21 mg L⁻¹ for clomazone, sulfentrazone, indaziflam, and tebuthiuron, respectively; and for A. caroliniana, the values were 3.26, 0.51, 0.11, and 0.71 mg L⁻¹, respectively. All tested herbicides were classified as highly toxic to macrophyte species, except for clomazone, which was categorized as 'moderately toxic' for A. caroliniana. Moreover, these herbicides significantly reduced fresh weight even at the lowest concentrations.
期刊介绍:
Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.