妊娠期糖尿病妇女怀孕三个月时的糖化白蛋白水平与妊娠相关不良后果有关。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yueshuai Pan, Ruting Gu, Qianqian Li, Jingyuan Wang, Yan Zhang, Lin Zhao, Yue Wu, Lili Wei
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病妇女怀孕三个月时的糖化白蛋白水平与妊娠相关不良后果有关。","authors":"Yueshuai Pan, Ruting Gu, Qianqian Li, Jingyuan Wang, Yan Zhang, Lin Zhao, Yue Wu, Lili Wei","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06994-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glycated albumin (GA) levels have been considered as a promising biomarker for estimating glycemic control during pregnancy, but the relationship between GA levels and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between GA levels during the third trimester and 13 different adverse pregnancy-related outcomes among women with GDM in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively extracted clinical data from the medical records of 819 pregnant women with GDM who underwent prenatal examinations and child delivery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2022 and October 2022. The cohort was divided into GA-high (GA-H) and GA-low (GA-L) groups based on the median GA level of 10.6%. Then, the incidence rates of 13 specific adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, we estimated the mean GA levels in pregnant GDM women with or without specific adverse outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether the GA levels (high or low) were independent risk factors for specific adverse outcomes in pregnant women with GDM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of GA levels for the adverse pregnant outcomes in women with GDM. E-value for sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings to unmeasured confoundings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 819 pregnant women with GDM, whose average age was 33.09 ± 4.47 years, average pre-pregnancy BMI was 23.51 ± 3.67 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and the average gestational week in which GDM diagnosed was 24.80 ± 1.79 weeks. The analysis showed that 80.71% (661/819) pregnant women with GDM were associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Pregnant women in the GA-L group showed higher incidence of the premature rupture of membranes (PROM), whereas those in the GA-H group showed higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. The GA levels showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.700 (P = 0.010), sensitivity of 71.4%, and specificity of 70.2%. The optimal cut off value for GA was 11.55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that GA levels were significantly associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially PROM and neonatal hypoglycemia. Furthermore, GA levels in the third trimester showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia among pregnant women with GDM. In the future, the potential role of GA as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes need to be further confirmed and explored in GDM women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glycated albumin levels in the third trimester of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Yueshuai Pan, Ruting Gu, Qianqian Li, Jingyuan Wang, Yan Zhang, Lin Zhao, Yue Wu, Lili Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06994-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glycated albumin (GA) levels have been considered as a promising biomarker for estimating glycemic control during pregnancy, but the relationship between GA levels and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between GA levels during the third trimester and 13 different adverse pregnancy-related outcomes among women with GDM in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively extracted clinical data from the medical records of 819 pregnant women with GDM who underwent prenatal examinations and child delivery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2022 and October 2022. The cohort was divided into GA-high (GA-H) and GA-low (GA-L) groups based on the median GA level of 10.6%. Then, the incidence rates of 13 specific adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, we estimated the mean GA levels in pregnant GDM women with or without specific adverse outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether the GA levels (high or low) were independent risk factors for specific adverse outcomes in pregnant women with GDM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of GA levels for the adverse pregnant outcomes in women with GDM. E-value for sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings to unmeasured confoundings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 819 pregnant women with GDM, whose average age was 33.09 ± 4.47 years, average pre-pregnancy BMI was 23.51 ± 3.67 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and the average gestational week in which GDM diagnosed was 24.80 ± 1.79 weeks. The analysis showed that 80.71% (661/819) pregnant women with GDM were associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Pregnant women in the GA-L group showed higher incidence of the premature rupture of membranes (PROM), whereas those in the GA-H group showed higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. The GA levels showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.700 (P = 0.010), sensitivity of 71.4%, and specificity of 70.2%. The optimal cut off value for GA was 11.55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that GA levels were significantly associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially PROM and neonatal hypoglycemia. Furthermore, GA levels in the third trimester showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia among pregnant women with GDM. In the future, the potential role of GA as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes need to be further confirmed and explored in GDM women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06994-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06994-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖化白蛋白(GA)水平被认为是一种很有前景的生物标志物,可用于评估妊娠期血糖控制情况,但GA水平与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女不良妊娠结局发生率之间的关系仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在探讨中国妊娠期糖尿病妇女妊娠三个月内GA水平与13种不同的不良妊娠结局之间的关系:我们回顾性地提取了2022年1月至2022年10月期间在青岛大学附属医院接受产前检查和分娩的819名GDM孕妇的病历资料。根据GA水平中位数10.6%,将孕妇分为GA-高(GA-H)组和GA-低(GA-L)组。然后,比较了两组间 13 种特定不良妊娠结局的发生率。此外,我们还估算了出现或未出现特定不良妊娠结局的 GDM 孕妇的平均 GA 水平。为了评估GA水平(高或低)是否是导致GDM孕妇特定不良妊娠结局的独立风险因素,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。为评估GA水平对GDM孕妇不良妊娠结局的预测价值,进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。为评估研究结果对未测量混杂因素的稳健性,进行了敏感性分析的 E 值:我们纳入了 819 名 GDM 孕妇,她们的平均年龄为(33.09±4.47)岁,平均孕前体重指数为(23.51±3.67)kg/m2,确诊 GDM 的平均孕周为(24.80±1.79)周。分析结果显示,80.71%(661/819)的 GDM 孕妇会出现与妊娠相关的不良后果。GA-L组孕妇胎膜早破(PROM)发生率较高,而GA-H组孕妇新生儿低血糖发生率较高。GA 水平在预测新生儿低血糖方面显示出可接受的临床表现,其 ROC 曲线下面积 (AUC) 值为 0.700(P = 0.010),灵敏度为 71.4%,特异性为 70.2%。GA的最佳临界值为11.55%:该研究表明,GA 水平与特定的不良妊娠结局,尤其是 PROM 和新生儿低血糖有显著相关性。此外,妊娠三个月的 GA 水平在预测 GDM 孕妇新生儿低血糖方面显示出了可接受的临床表现。未来,GA作为不良妊娠结局预测因子的潜在作用需要在GDM孕妇中进一步证实和探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glycated albumin levels in the third trimester of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes.

Background: Glycated albumin (GA) levels have been considered as a promising biomarker for estimating glycemic control during pregnancy, but the relationship between GA levels and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between GA levels during the third trimester and 13 different adverse pregnancy-related outcomes among women with GDM in China.

Methods: We retrospectively extracted clinical data from the medical records of 819 pregnant women with GDM who underwent prenatal examinations and child delivery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2022 and October 2022. The cohort was divided into GA-high (GA-H) and GA-low (GA-L) groups based on the median GA level of 10.6%. Then, the incidence rates of 13 specific adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, we estimated the mean GA levels in pregnant GDM women with or without specific adverse outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess whether the GA levels (high or low) were independent risk factors for specific adverse outcomes in pregnant women with GDM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of GA levels for the adverse pregnant outcomes in women with GDM. E-value for sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the findings to unmeasured confoundings.

Results: We included 819 pregnant women with GDM, whose average age was 33.09 ± 4.47 years, average pre-pregnancy BMI was 23.51 ± 3.67 kg/m2, and the average gestational week in which GDM diagnosed was 24.80 ± 1.79 weeks. The analysis showed that 80.71% (661/819) pregnant women with GDM were associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Pregnant women in the GA-L group showed higher incidence of the premature rupture of membranes (PROM), whereas those in the GA-H group showed higher incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. The GA levels showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.700 (P = 0.010), sensitivity of 71.4%, and specificity of 70.2%. The optimal cut off value for GA was 11.55%.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that GA levels were significantly associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially PROM and neonatal hypoglycemia. Furthermore, GA levels in the third trimester showed acceptable clinical performance for predicting neonatal hypoglycemia among pregnant women with GDM. In the future, the potential role of GA as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes need to be further confirmed and explored in GDM women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信