牛津肩关节不稳定性评分:跨文化西班牙语改编及其方法质量分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Fernando Espuny-Ruiz, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo
{"title":"牛津肩关节不稳定性评分:跨文化西班牙语改编及其方法质量分析。","authors":"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Fernando Espuny-Ruiz, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08075-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a patient reported outcome measure designed specifically to assess functional difficulties resulting from shoulder instability. The main aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the OSIS to Spanish. Secondary, it aimed to analyse its methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish has been carried out following the recommendations of COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) with a sample of 167 cases of shoulder instability. Inclusion criteria were: subjects with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder with or without clinical diagnosis; aged between 18 and 60. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: validity (construct, internal and external), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and measurement error), discriminant ability and feasibility. The methodological quality was addressed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist (COSMIN RoB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The construct validity obtained an OSIS correlation with the Simple Shoulder Test of r = 0.636 and with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability of r = 0.80. The unidimensionality of the OSIS was confirmed through second-order factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were both 0.93 (IC95%: 0.91-0.94). Standard error of measurement was 0.70, and the percentage of error and smallest detectable change were 1.46% and 1.94, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Assessing feasibility of OSIS, the participants answered all questions, had no questions and completion time was: mean 2 min 30 s; SD ± 1 min. Regarding methodological quality, the study showed low risk of bias in the areas of patient selection, index test, reference standard and flow and timing, as well as low concern regarding applicability in the domains of patient selection, index test and reference standard according to QUADAS-2. In relation to COSMIN RoB, all psychometric properties, except for content validity, obtained very good results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Spanish version of OSIS offers valid, reliable and feasible functional outcome measures for Spanish-speaking subjects with shoulder instability, based on its psychometric properties and its methodological quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxford Shoulder Instability Score: cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish and analysis of its methodological quality.\",\"authors\":\"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Fernando Espuny-Ruiz, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-08075-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a patient reported outcome measure designed specifically to assess functional difficulties resulting from shoulder instability. The main aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the OSIS to Spanish. Secondary, it aimed to analyse its methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish has been carried out following the recommendations of COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) with a sample of 167 cases of shoulder instability. Inclusion criteria were: subjects with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder with or without clinical diagnosis; aged between 18 and 60. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: validity (construct, internal and external), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and measurement error), discriminant ability and feasibility. The methodological quality was addressed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist (COSMIN RoB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The construct validity obtained an OSIS correlation with the Simple Shoulder Test of r = 0.636 and with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability of r = 0.80. The unidimensionality of the OSIS was confirmed through second-order factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were both 0.93 (IC95%: 0.91-0.94). Standard error of measurement was 0.70, and the percentage of error and smallest detectable change were 1.46% and 1.94, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Assessing feasibility of OSIS, the participants answered all questions, had no questions and completion time was: mean 2 min 30 s; SD ± 1 min. Regarding methodological quality, the study showed low risk of bias in the areas of patient selection, index test, reference standard and flow and timing, as well as low concern regarding applicability in the domains of patient selection, index test and reference standard according to QUADAS-2. In relation to COSMIN RoB, all psychometric properties, except for content validity, obtained very good results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Spanish version of OSIS offers valid, reliable and feasible functional outcome measures for Spanish-speaking subjects with shoulder instability, based on its psychometric properties and its methodological quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08075-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08075-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍牛津肩关节不稳定性评分(OSIS)是一种患者报告的结果测量方法,专门用于评估肩关节不稳导致的功能障碍。本研究的主要目的是将 OSIS 进行跨文化调整,使其适用于西班牙语。其次,研究还旨在分析其方法质量:方法:根据《基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准》(COSMIN)的建议,对 167 个肩关节不稳定病例样本进行了跨文化西班牙语改编。纳入标准为:至少一个肩部有不稳定症状,有或没有临床诊断;年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间。对以下心理测量特性进行了评估:效度(构造、内部和外部)、信度(内部一致性、重复测试和测量误差)、判别能力和可行性。方法学质量通过诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)和 COSMIN 偏差风险检查表(COSMIN RoB)进行评估:OSIS与简单肩关节测试(Simple Shoulder Test)的相关性为r = 0.636,与西安大略省肩关节不稳定性测试(Western Ontario Shoulder Instability)的相关性为r = 0.80。通过二阶因子分析证实了OSIS的单维性。Cronbach'sα和类内相关系数均为0.93(IC95%:0.91-0.94)。测量标准误差为 0.70,误差百分比和可检测到的最小变化分别为 1.46%和 1.94。没有发现下限或上限效应。在评估 OSIS 的可行性方面,参与者回答了所有问题,没有问题,完成时间为:平均 2 分 30 秒;标准差 ± 1 分钟。在方法学质量方面,根据 QUADAS-2 标准,该研究在患者选择、指标测试、参考标准和流程与时间方面的偏倚风险较低,在患者选择、指标测试和参考标准方面的适用性关注度较低。就 COSMIN RoB 而言,除内容效度外,所有心理测量属性都获得了非常好的结果:根据其心理测量学特性和方法学质量,西班牙文版 OSIS 为讲西班牙语的肩关节不稳定患者提供了有效、可靠和可行的功能结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxford Shoulder Instability Score: cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish and analysis of its methodological quality.

Background: Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a patient reported outcome measure designed specifically to assess functional difficulties resulting from shoulder instability. The main aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the OSIS to Spanish. Secondary, it aimed to analyse its methodological quality.

Methods: A cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish has been carried out following the recommendations of COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) with a sample of 167 cases of shoulder instability. Inclusion criteria were: subjects with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder with or without clinical diagnosis; aged between 18 and 60. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: validity (construct, internal and external), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and measurement error), discriminant ability and feasibility. The methodological quality was addressed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist (COSMIN RoB).

Results: The construct validity obtained an OSIS correlation with the Simple Shoulder Test of r = 0.636 and with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability of r = 0.80. The unidimensionality of the OSIS was confirmed through second-order factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were both 0.93 (IC95%: 0.91-0.94). Standard error of measurement was 0.70, and the percentage of error and smallest detectable change were 1.46% and 1.94, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Assessing feasibility of OSIS, the participants answered all questions, had no questions and completion time was: mean 2 min 30 s; SD ± 1 min. Regarding methodological quality, the study showed low risk of bias in the areas of patient selection, index test, reference standard and flow and timing, as well as low concern regarding applicability in the domains of patient selection, index test and reference standard according to QUADAS-2. In relation to COSMIN RoB, all psychometric properties, except for content validity, obtained very good results.

Conclusions: The Spanish version of OSIS offers valid, reliable and feasible functional outcome measures for Spanish-speaking subjects with shoulder instability, based on its psychometric properties and its methodological quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信