Ebraheem Albazee, Ammar H Alabsi, Salman Hussain, Abdullah S Alghamdi, Ahmed Abu-Zaid
{"title":"氨甲环酸在内窥镜鼻窦手术中的应用:随机对照试验的最新系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ebraheem Albazee, Ammar H Alabsi, Salman Hussain, Abdullah S Alghamdi, Ahmed Abu-Zaid","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09051-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct an updated meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus control during endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were screened until July 7, 2024, and the quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed. Endpoints were summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 RCTs, including 29 arms and 1597 patients, were analyzed. The overall quality was rated as low-risk in 15 RCTs, high-risk in five RCTs, and of some concern in three RCTs. TXA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (n = 22 arms, MD = - 68.87 ml, 95% CI - 79.66, - 58.07) and operative time (n = 21 arms, MD = - 13.93 min, 95% CI - 17.49, - 10.37) compared to control. TXA also improved surgical field quality (measured on a 5-point Boezaart scale, n = 22 arms, MD = - 0.61, 95% CI - 0.88, - 0.34) and surgeon satisfaction scores (n = 9 arms, MD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.53, 1.17). No thromboembolic events were reported in either group. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of all endpoints, and no publication bias was detected. Subgroup analyses by route of administration (intravenous, topical, and oral) showed equal effectiveness. Additionally, analyses by sinus pathology demonstrated effectiveness in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusiveness for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative TXA, whether administered systemically or topically, correlates with decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened operating times, and enhanced surgical visualization compared to control interventions. However, these findings are constrained by significant heterogeneity and varying reporting quality among studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic acid in endoscopic sinus surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ebraheem Albazee, Ammar H Alabsi, Salman Hussain, Abdullah S Alghamdi, Ahmed Abu-Zaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-09051-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct an updated meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus control during endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were screened until July 7, 2024, and the quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed. Endpoints were summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 RCTs, including 29 arms and 1597 patients, were analyzed. The overall quality was rated as low-risk in 15 RCTs, high-risk in five RCTs, and of some concern in three RCTs. TXA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (n = 22 arms, MD = - 68.87 ml, 95% CI - 79.66, - 58.07) and operative time (n = 21 arms, MD = - 13.93 min, 95% CI - 17.49, - 10.37) compared to control. TXA also improved surgical field quality (measured on a 5-point Boezaart scale, n = 22 arms, MD = - 0.61, 95% CI - 0.88, - 0.34) and surgeon satisfaction scores (n = 9 arms, MD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.53, 1.17). No thromboembolic events were reported in either group. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of all endpoints, and no publication bias was detected. Subgroup analyses by route of administration (intravenous, topical, and oral) showed equal effectiveness. Additionally, analyses by sinus pathology demonstrated effectiveness in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusiveness for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative TXA, whether administered systemically or topically, correlates with decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened operating times, and enhanced surgical visualization compared to control interventions. However, these findings are constrained by significant heterogeneity and varying reporting quality among studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09051-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09051-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tranexamic acid in endoscopic sinus surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Purpose: To conduct an updated meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus control during endoscopic sinus surgery.
Methods: Six databases were screened until July 7, 2024, and the quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed. Endpoints were summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.
Results: A total of 23 RCTs, including 29 arms and 1597 patients, were analyzed. The overall quality was rated as low-risk in 15 RCTs, high-risk in five RCTs, and of some concern in three RCTs. TXA significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (n = 22 arms, MD = - 68.87 ml, 95% CI - 79.66, - 58.07) and operative time (n = 21 arms, MD = - 13.93 min, 95% CI - 17.49, - 10.37) compared to control. TXA also improved surgical field quality (measured on a 5-point Boezaart scale, n = 22 arms, MD = - 0.61, 95% CI - 0.88, - 0.34) and surgeon satisfaction scores (n = 9 arms, MD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.53, 1.17). No thromboembolic events were reported in either group. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of all endpoints, and no publication bias was detected. Subgroup analyses by route of administration (intravenous, topical, and oral) showed equal effectiveness. Additionally, analyses by sinus pathology demonstrated effectiveness in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusiveness for all outcomes.
Conclusion: Perioperative TXA, whether administered systemically or topically, correlates with decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened operating times, and enhanced surgical visualization compared to control interventions. However, these findings are constrained by significant heterogeneity and varying reporting quality among studies.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.