棘间韧带的高强度:退行性腰椎骨质增生症腰椎不稳和腰痛的诊断标志。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jiang Jiang, Min Chen, Ding-An Huang, Jun-Jie Luo, Jian-Bang Han, Ming Hu, Ying-Feng Wang
{"title":"棘间韧带的高强度:退行性腰椎骨质增生症腰椎不稳和腰痛的诊断标志。","authors":"Jiang Jiang, Min Chen, Ding-An Huang, Jun-Jie Luo, Jian-Bang Han, Ming Hu, Ying-Feng Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08081-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the clinical significance of high intensity signals in interspinous ligaments at the affected segment in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), as well as to determine the most effective diagnostic modalities for evaluating segmental instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed a consecutive series of patients with L4/5 DLS between July 2023 and December 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of high-intensity signals in interspinous ligaments: the higher group (Group H), and the non-higher group (Group NH). Translational and angular motion was determined using flexion and extension (FE) radiographs or a sitting lumbar lateral radiograph with a supine sagittal MR image (combined, S-MR). The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) was employed to evaluate patients' objective functional impairment (OFI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 73 patients were enrolled in this study, and there were 22 (30.1%) patients in group H and 51(69.9%) patients in group NH, with an average age of 60.3 ± 8.1 years. The patients in Group H exhibited significantly longer 5R-STS times and serious OFI compared to those in Group NH. Compared to Group NH, Group H exhibited significantly higher SP in the sitting position (21.8% vs 16.7%; P < 0.001*), while no significant differences were observed in the upright, flexion, extension, and supine MRI positions (all P values > 0.05). In Group H, \"instability\" was recognized in 77.3% of patients using S-MR versus 40.9% patients using FE (P < 0.001); While in Group NH, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of \"instability\" between FE and s-MR (37.3% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.53). Overall, a significantly higher incidence of instability was found in Group H compared to Group NH (77.3% vs .37.3%, P < 0 .001*).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLS with a high intensity within the interspinous ligaments is a distinct subgroup associated with segmental instability, the combination of 5R-STS and S-MR should be regarded as the most clinically relevant approach for assessing OFI and lumbar instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High intensity in interspinous ligaments: a diagnostic sign of lumbar instability and back pain for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Jiang, Min Chen, Ding-An Huang, Jun-Jie Luo, Jian-Bang Han, Ming Hu, Ying-Feng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-08081-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the clinical significance of high intensity signals in interspinous ligaments at the affected segment in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), as well as to determine the most effective diagnostic modalities for evaluating segmental instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed a consecutive series of patients with L4/5 DLS between July 2023 and December 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of high-intensity signals in interspinous ligaments: the higher group (Group H), and the non-higher group (Group NH). Translational and angular motion was determined using flexion and extension (FE) radiographs or a sitting lumbar lateral radiograph with a supine sagittal MR image (combined, S-MR). The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) was employed to evaluate patients' objective functional impairment (OFI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 73 patients were enrolled in this study, and there were 22 (30.1%) patients in group H and 51(69.9%) patients in group NH, with an average age of 60.3 ± 8.1 years. The patients in Group H exhibited significantly longer 5R-STS times and serious OFI compared to those in Group NH. Compared to Group NH, Group H exhibited significantly higher SP in the sitting position (21.8% vs 16.7%; P < 0.001*), while no significant differences were observed in the upright, flexion, extension, and supine MRI positions (all P values > 0.05). In Group H, \\\"instability\\\" was recognized in 77.3% of patients using S-MR versus 40.9% patients using FE (P < 0.001); While in Group NH, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of \\\"instability\\\" between FE and s-MR (37.3% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.53). Overall, a significantly higher incidence of instability was found in Group H compared to Group NH (77.3% vs .37.3%, P < 0 .001*).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLS with a high intensity within the interspinous ligaments is a distinct subgroup associated with segmental instability, the combination of 5R-STS and S-MR should be regarded as the most clinically relevant approach for assessing OFI and lumbar instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08081-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08081-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景目的:探讨退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)受累节段棘间韧带高强度信号的临床意义,并确定评估节段不稳定性的最有效诊断方法:本研究回顾了 2023 年 7 月至 2023 年 12 月间 L4/5 DLS 患者的连续序列。根据棘间韧带是否存在高强度信号将入组患者分为两组:高强度组(H 组)和非高强度组(NH 组)。使用屈伸(FE)X光片或坐位腰椎侧位X光片和仰卧矢状位磁共振成像(合并,S-MR)确定横向和角度运动。采用五次重复坐立测试(5R-STS)评估患者的客观功能障碍(OFI):本研究共纳入 73 例患者,其中 H 组 22 例(30.1%),NH 组 51 例(69.9%),平均年龄(60.3±8.1)岁。与 NH 组相比,H 组患者的 5R-STS 时间和严重 OFI 明显更长。与 NH 组相比,H 组患者坐位时的 SP 明显更高(21.8% 对 16.7%;P 0.05)。在 H 组中,77.3% 的患者使用 S-MR 可识别出 "不稳定",而使用 FE 的患者只有 40.9%(P 结论:H 组患者的 "不稳定 "识别率高于 NH 组):脊柱间韧带内高强度的 DLS 是与节段不稳定性相关的一个独特亚组,5R-STS 和 S-MR 的组合应被视为评估 OFI 和腰椎不稳定性的最具临床相关性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High intensity in interspinous ligaments: a diagnostic sign of lumbar instability and back pain for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Background: To investigate the clinical significance of high intensity signals in interspinous ligaments at the affected segment in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), as well as to determine the most effective diagnostic modalities for evaluating segmental instability.

Methods: This study reviewed a consecutive series of patients with L4/5 DLS between July 2023 and December 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of high-intensity signals in interspinous ligaments: the higher group (Group H), and the non-higher group (Group NH). Translational and angular motion was determined using flexion and extension (FE) radiographs or a sitting lumbar lateral radiograph with a supine sagittal MR image (combined, S-MR). The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) was employed to evaluate patients' objective functional impairment (OFI).

Results: Overall, 73 patients were enrolled in this study, and there were 22 (30.1%) patients in group H and 51(69.9%) patients in group NH, with an average age of 60.3 ± 8.1 years. The patients in Group H exhibited significantly longer 5R-STS times and serious OFI compared to those in Group NH. Compared to Group NH, Group H exhibited significantly higher SP in the sitting position (21.8% vs 16.7%; P < 0.001*), while no significant differences were observed in the upright, flexion, extension, and supine MRI positions (all P values > 0.05). In Group H, "instability" was recognized in 77.3% of patients using S-MR versus 40.9% patients using FE (P < 0.001); While in Group NH, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of "instability" between FE and s-MR (37.3% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.53). Overall, a significantly higher incidence of instability was found in Group H compared to Group NH (77.3% vs .37.3%, P < 0 .001*).

Conclusions: DLS with a high intensity within the interspinous ligaments is a distinct subgroup associated with segmental instability, the combination of 5R-STS and S-MR should be regarded as the most clinically relevant approach for assessing OFI and lumbar instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信