将卵泡冲洗作为提高牛卵母细胞产量和体外胚胎生产的一种手段。

IF 2.1
R J Simmons, D A R Tutt, W Y Kwong, J I Baroni, L N Lim, R Cimpeanu, A A Castrejon-Pita, M Vatish, P Svensson, R Piegsa, U Hagby, K D Sinclair, E X Georgiou
{"title":"将卵泡冲洗作为提高牛卵母细胞产量和体外胚胎生产的一种手段。","authors":"R J Simmons, D A R Tutt, W Y Kwong, J I Baroni, L N Lim, R Cimpeanu, A A Castrejon-Pita, M Vatish, P Svensson, R Piegsa, U Hagby, K D Sinclair, E X Georgiou","doi":"10.1071/RD24125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Context The number of developmentally competent cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved during Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) determines success in both bovine and human assisted reproduction. Follicular flushing for COC retrieval is practicsed widely in humans but not in cattle. Aims To determine the benefits of follicular flushing in cattle and assess the merits of a novel 16G double-lumen needle ('OxIVF') that flushes laterally to the needle shaft. Methods Experiment 1 flushed 655 antral follicles (≥7mm) from 255 abattoir-derived cattle ovaries. In Experiment 2, 12 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU in a cross-over design comparing both needle types. In Experiment 3, 11 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU using the OxIVF needle in a cross-over design: flushing (≥7mm follicles) vs a 'Hybrid' approach of flushing (≥7mm follicles) and aspiration (5-7mm follicles); followed by two cycles of standard follicle aspiration (>5mm follicles). Key results In Experiment 1, COC recovery was greater (P =0.034) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (mean±s.e.; 74.1±2.10% vs 67.0±2.23%); yield of Grade 1 COCs was also greater (20.1±1.97% vs 8.2±1.38%; P P =0.045) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (89.1±2.98% vs 79.6±3.47%). Day 6 embryo yield was also greater (P =0.017) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (87.2±4.38% vs 67.6±6.73%). In Experiment 3, recovery of COCs was greater (P =0.033) for 'Flush' vs 'Aspirate' groups (82.1±5.06% vs 66.2±3.48%). However, number of Day 8 blastocysts for the 'Hybrid' vs 'Flush' approach (9.2±1.39vs 6.5±1.05 per cycle) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle, embracing the 'Hybrid' approach, has the potential to increase oocyte retrieval and blastocyst number per donor cycle in cattle but requires further validation. Implications Larger scale studies will seek to confirm benefits of follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle in cattle. Future studies should consider applications in both equine and human assisted reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":516117,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction, fertility, and development","volume":"36 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ovarian follicular flushing as a means of increasing oocyte yield and <i>in vitro</i> embryo production in cattle.\",\"authors\":\"R J Simmons, D A R Tutt, W Y Kwong, J I Baroni, L N Lim, R Cimpeanu, A A Castrejon-Pita, M Vatish, P Svensson, R Piegsa, U Hagby, K D Sinclair, E X Georgiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/RD24125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Context The number of developmentally competent cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved during Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) determines success in both bovine and human assisted reproduction. Follicular flushing for COC retrieval is practicsed widely in humans but not in cattle. Aims To determine the benefits of follicular flushing in cattle and assess the merits of a novel 16G double-lumen needle ('OxIVF') that flushes laterally to the needle shaft. Methods Experiment 1 flushed 655 antral follicles (≥7mm) from 255 abattoir-derived cattle ovaries. In Experiment 2, 12 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU in a cross-over design comparing both needle types. In Experiment 3, 11 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU using the OxIVF needle in a cross-over design: flushing (≥7mm follicles) vs a 'Hybrid' approach of flushing (≥7mm follicles) and aspiration (5-7mm follicles); followed by two cycles of standard follicle aspiration (>5mm follicles). Key results In Experiment 1, COC recovery was greater (P =0.034) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (mean±s.e.; 74.1±2.10% vs 67.0±2.23%); yield of Grade 1 COCs was also greater (20.1±1.97% vs 8.2±1.38%; P P =0.045) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (89.1±2.98% vs 79.6±3.47%). Day 6 embryo yield was also greater (P =0.017) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (87.2±4.38% vs 67.6±6.73%). In Experiment 3, recovery of COCs was greater (P =0.033) for 'Flush' vs 'Aspirate' groups (82.1±5.06% vs 66.2±3.48%). However, number of Day 8 blastocysts for the 'Hybrid' vs 'Flush' approach (9.2±1.39vs 6.5±1.05 per cycle) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle, embracing the 'Hybrid' approach, has the potential to increase oocyte retrieval and blastocyst number per donor cycle in cattle but requires further validation. Implications Larger scale studies will seek to confirm benefits of follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle in cattle. Future studies should consider applications in both equine and human assisted reproduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproduction, fertility, and development\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproduction, fertility, and development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/RD24125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction, fertility, and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/RD24125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在取卵(OPU)过程中取回的具有发育能力的卵泡-卵母细胞复合体(COC)的数量决定了牛和人类辅助生殖的成功与否。人类广泛采用卵泡冲洗法提取 COC,但牛尚未采用。目的 确定牛卵泡冲洗的益处,并评估新型 16G 双腔针头("OxIVF")的优点,这种针头可从侧面冲洗针轴。方法 实验 1 从 255 个来自屠宰场的牛卵巢中冲洗出 655 个前腔卵泡(≥7 毫米)。在实验 2 中,12 头荷斯坦小母牛在交叉设计中接受了两个周期的 OPU,对两种针型进行了比较。在实验 3 中,11 头荷斯坦小母牛在交叉设计中使用 OxIVF 注射针进行了两个周期的 OPU:冲洗(≥7 毫米卵泡)与冲洗(≥7 毫米卵泡)和抽吸(5-7 毫米卵泡)的 "混合 "方法;然后进行两个周期的标准卵泡抽吸(>5 毫米卵泡)。主要结果 在实验 1 中,OxIVF 与标准针相比,COC 回收率更高(P =0.034)(平均值(±s.e.);74.1±2.10% vs 67.0±2.23%);OxIVF 与标准针相比,1 级 COC 的产量也更高(20.1±1.97% vs 8.2±1.38%;P =0.045)(89.1±2.98% vs 79.6±3.47%)。OxIVF 与标准针相比(87.2±4.38% vs 67.6±6.73%),第 6 天的胚胎率也更高(P =0.017)。在实验 3 中,"冲洗 "组与 "抽吸 "组的 COC 回收率更高(P =0.033)(82.1±5.06% vs 66.2±3.48%)。然而,"混合 "与 "冲洗 "方法的第 8 天囊胚数(每个周期 9.2±1.39 vs 6.5±1.05)未达到统计学意义。结论 使用 OxIVF 针进行卵泡冲洗,并采用 "混合 "方法,有可能增加牛每个供体周期的卵母细胞取回率和囊胚数量,但需要进一步验证。意义 更大规模的研究将寻求确认使用 OxIVF 冲洗针进行牛卵泡冲洗的益处。未来的研究应考虑在马和人类辅助生殖中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ovarian follicular flushing as a means of increasing oocyte yield and in vitro embryo production in cattle.

Context The number of developmentally competent cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved during Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) determines success in both bovine and human assisted reproduction. Follicular flushing for COC retrieval is practicsed widely in humans but not in cattle. Aims To determine the benefits of follicular flushing in cattle and assess the merits of a novel 16G double-lumen needle ('OxIVF') that flushes laterally to the needle shaft. Methods Experiment 1 flushed 655 antral follicles (≥7mm) from 255 abattoir-derived cattle ovaries. In Experiment 2, 12 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU in a cross-over design comparing both needle types. In Experiment 3, 11 Holstein heifers underwent two cycles of OPU using the OxIVF needle in a cross-over design: flushing (≥7mm follicles) vs a 'Hybrid' approach of flushing (≥7mm follicles) and aspiration (5-7mm follicles); followed by two cycles of standard follicle aspiration (>5mm follicles). Key results In Experiment 1, COC recovery was greater (P =0.034) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (mean±s.e.; 74.1±2.10% vs 67.0±2.23%); yield of Grade 1 COCs was also greater (20.1±1.97% vs 8.2±1.38%; P P =0.045) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (89.1±2.98% vs 79.6±3.47%). Day 6 embryo yield was also greater (P =0.017) for the OxIVF vs Standard needle (87.2±4.38% vs 67.6±6.73%). In Experiment 3, recovery of COCs was greater (P =0.033) for 'Flush' vs 'Aspirate' groups (82.1±5.06% vs 66.2±3.48%). However, number of Day 8 blastocysts for the 'Hybrid' vs 'Flush' approach (9.2±1.39vs 6.5±1.05 per cycle) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle, embracing the 'Hybrid' approach, has the potential to increase oocyte retrieval and blastocyst number per donor cycle in cattle but requires further validation. Implications Larger scale studies will seek to confirm benefits of follicular flushing using the OxIVF needle in cattle. Future studies should consider applications in both equine and human assisted reproduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信