对急性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄相关的前循环大血管闭塞进行支架置入术的长期效果。

Hyungjong Park, Byung Moon Kim, Jun-Whee Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Jang-Hyun Baek, Dong Joon Kim, Min Jeoung Kim, Sun Yoon, Chang Ki Jang, Sunghan Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Jung-Keun Lee, In Hwan Lim, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam, Young Dae Kim
{"title":"对急性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄相关的前循环大血管闭塞进行支架置入术的长期效果。","authors":"Hyungjong Park, Byung Moon Kim, Jun-Whee Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Jang-Hyun Baek, Dong Joon Kim, Min Jeoung Kim, Sun Yoon, Chang Ki Jang, Sunghan Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Jung-Keun Lee, In Hwan Lim, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam, Young Dae Kim","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Rescue stent (RS) is an accepted rescue option after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the long-term outcomes (≥ 12 months) of RS have not yet been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 154 patients with RS for ICAS-related LVO, which were identified from prospectively maintained multicenter database of RS after MT failure, to assess good outcome (mRS 0-2), mortality, stroke recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and stent patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 154 patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 132 (85.7%) after RS. Clinical follow-up was available in 148 patients at 3 months, of whom 126 were followed longer than 12 months. Good outcome was observed in 53.4% (79/148) at 3 months and 53.2% (67/126) at the final assessment among survivors (median [interquartile range (IQR)] months, 33 [13-91]). The overall incidence of mortality was 16.2% (24/148) Mortality occurred in 8.8% (13/148) of patients at 3 months and 8.7% (11/126) thereafter, respectively. Stroke recurrence was 0.7% (1/148) within 3 months and 3.2% (4/126) thereafter. The overall incidence of SICH was 9.5% (14/148). SICH occurred in 8.8% (13/148) within the first 3 months, and in 0.8% (1/126) thereafter. The stented vessel was patent in 81.1% (99/122) at the first follow-up (median [IQR] days, 3 [1-125]) and 96.7% (89/92) at the final follow-up (median [IQR] months, 18 [13-68]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with RS for ICAS-LVO showed a low stroke recurrence rate in the long term. The long-term patency of rescue stent appears to remain durable, particularly when it remains patent during the initial follow-upABBREVIATIONS: ICAS = intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; LVO = large vessel occlusion; AIS = acute ischemic stroke; MT = mechanical thrombectomy; RS = rescue stenting; CT = computed tomography; MR = magnetic resonance; MMD = moyamoya disease; Intra-arterial = IA; Intravenous = IV; DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcome of Rescue Stenting for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Related Large Vessel Occlusion in Anterior Circulation.\",\"authors\":\"Hyungjong Park, Byung Moon Kim, Jun-Whee Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Jang-Hyun Baek, Dong Joon Kim, Min Jeoung Kim, Sun Yoon, Chang Ki Jang, Sunghan Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Jung-Keun Lee, In Hwan Lim, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam, Young Dae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Rescue stent (RS) is an accepted rescue option after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the long-term outcomes (≥ 12 months) of RS have not yet been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 154 patients with RS for ICAS-related LVO, which were identified from prospectively maintained multicenter database of RS after MT failure, to assess good outcome (mRS 0-2), mortality, stroke recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and stent patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 154 patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 132 (85.7%) after RS. Clinical follow-up was available in 148 patients at 3 months, of whom 126 were followed longer than 12 months. Good outcome was observed in 53.4% (79/148) at 3 months and 53.2% (67/126) at the final assessment among survivors (median [interquartile range (IQR)] months, 33 [13-91]). The overall incidence of mortality was 16.2% (24/148) Mortality occurred in 8.8% (13/148) of patients at 3 months and 8.7% (11/126) thereafter, respectively. Stroke recurrence was 0.7% (1/148) within 3 months and 3.2% (4/126) thereafter. The overall incidence of SICH was 9.5% (14/148). SICH occurred in 8.8% (13/148) within the first 3 months, and in 0.8% (1/126) thereafter. The stented vessel was patent in 81.1% (99/122) at the first follow-up (median [IQR] days, 3 [1-125]) and 96.7% (89/92) at the final follow-up (median [IQR] months, 18 [13-68]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with RS for ICAS-LVO showed a low stroke recurrence rate in the long term. The long-term patency of rescue stent appears to remain durable, particularly when it remains patent during the initial follow-upABBREVIATIONS: ICAS = intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; LVO = large vessel occlusion; AIS = acute ischemic stroke; MT = mechanical thrombectomy; RS = rescue stenting; CT = computed tomography; MR = magnetic resonance; MMD = moyamoya disease; Intra-arterial = IA; Intravenous = IV; DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:救治支架(RS)是治疗因颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)导致的大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中的机械取栓术(MT)失败后的一种公认的救治方案。然而,RS 的长期疗效(≥ 12 个月)尚未阐明:我们回顾性分析了154例因ICAS相关LVO而接受RS治疗的患者的数据,这些患者是从前瞻性维护的MT失败后RS治疗多中心数据库中找到的,目的是评估良好预后(mRS 0-2)、死亡率、卒中复发、症状性颅内出血(SICH)和支架通畅率:在154名患者中,132人(85.7%)在RS术后成功实现了再通路。对148名患者进行了3个月的临床随访,其中126人的随访时间超过12个月。53.4%的患者(79/148)在3个月时预后良好,53.2%的患者(67/126)在最终评估时预后良好(中位数[四分位距(IQR)]月数,33 [13-91])。总死亡率为 16.2%(24/148),其中 8.8%(13/148)的患者在 3 个月后死亡,8.7%(11/126)的患者在 3 个月后死亡。3个月内中风复发率为0.7%(1/148),3个月后复发率为3.2%(4/126)。SICH的总发生率为9.5%(14/148)。8.8%的患者(13/148)在术后3个月内发生SICH,此后为0.8%(1/126)。在首次随访(中位数[IQR]天数为3[1-125])和最终随访(中位数[IQR]月数为18[13-68])中,支架血管通畅率分别为81.1%(99/122)和96.7%(89/92):结论:接受 RS 治疗的 ICAS-LVO 患者长期卒中复发率较低。结论:接受 RS 治疗的 ICAS-LVO 患者中风的长期复发率较低,救治支架的长期通畅性似乎仍然持久,尤其是在初始随访期间保持通畅的情况下:ICAS=颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄;LVO=大血管闭塞;AIS=急性缺血性卒中;MT=机械性血栓切除术;RS=抢救性支架植入术;CT=计算机断层扫描;MR=磁共振;MMD=莫亚莫亚病;动脉内=IA;静脉内=IV;DAPT=双重抗血小板疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Outcome of Rescue Stenting for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Related Large Vessel Occlusion in Anterior Circulation.

Background and purpose: Rescue stent (RS) is an accepted rescue option after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the long-term outcomes (≥ 12 months) of RS have not yet been elucidated.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 154 patients with RS for ICAS-related LVO, which were identified from prospectively maintained multicenter database of RS after MT failure, to assess good outcome (mRS 0-2), mortality, stroke recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and stent patency.

Results: Among 154 patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 132 (85.7%) after RS. Clinical follow-up was available in 148 patients at 3 months, of whom 126 were followed longer than 12 months. Good outcome was observed in 53.4% (79/148) at 3 months and 53.2% (67/126) at the final assessment among survivors (median [interquartile range (IQR)] months, 33 [13-91]). The overall incidence of mortality was 16.2% (24/148) Mortality occurred in 8.8% (13/148) of patients at 3 months and 8.7% (11/126) thereafter, respectively. Stroke recurrence was 0.7% (1/148) within 3 months and 3.2% (4/126) thereafter. The overall incidence of SICH was 9.5% (14/148). SICH occurred in 8.8% (13/148) within the first 3 months, and in 0.8% (1/126) thereafter. The stented vessel was patent in 81.1% (99/122) at the first follow-up (median [IQR] days, 3 [1-125]) and 96.7% (89/92) at the final follow-up (median [IQR] months, 18 [13-68]).

Conclusions: Patients with RS for ICAS-LVO showed a low stroke recurrence rate in the long term. The long-term patency of rescue stent appears to remain durable, particularly when it remains patent during the initial follow-upABBREVIATIONS: ICAS = intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; LVO = large vessel occlusion; AIS = acute ischemic stroke; MT = mechanical thrombectomy; RS = rescue stenting; CT = computed tomography; MR = magnetic resonance; MMD = moyamoya disease; Intra-arterial = IA; Intravenous = IV; DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信