植入或更换植入式心律转复除颤器后室性心律失常的发生率以及限制驾驶的后果。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thomas Marc, Karim Benali, Pierre Groussin, Redwane Rakza, Joana Brito, Nathalie Behar, Philippe Mabo, Dominique Pavin, Christophe Leclercq, Vincent Galand, Raphaël P Martins
{"title":"植入或更换植入式心律转复除颤器后室性心律失常的发生率以及限制驾驶的后果。","authors":"Thomas Marc, Karim Benali, Pierre Groussin, Redwane Rakza, Joana Brito, Nathalie Behar, Philippe Mabo, Dominique Pavin, Christophe Leclercq, Vincent Galand, Raphaël P Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following implantation/replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patients are legally subjected to variable lengths of driving restrictions based on the indication (1 and 3 months after primary and secondary prevention, respectively; 1 week after device replacement).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period in a large cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary or secondary prevention or device replacement between 2015 and 2021 were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period, as defined by guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 914 patients were analysed, including 654 first implantations (438 and 216 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively) and 260 device replacements. The primary outcome occurred in 2/438 patients (0.004%) during the 1-month period following device implantation for primary prevention and in 25/216 patients (11.5%) during the 3-month period following device implantation for secondary prevention; it did not occur in the 1-week period following device replacement. The monthly calculated risk of harm remained below the accepted threshold of 0.005% for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary prevention patients, such as those who have undergone device replacement, have a low risk of ventricular arrhythmia, which could lead to a reduction in their driving restriction period. Secondary prevention patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, supporting the 3-month driving restriction period.</p>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation or replacement, and driving restriction consequences.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Marc, Karim Benali, Pierre Groussin, Redwane Rakza, Joana Brito, Nathalie Behar, Philippe Mabo, Dominique Pavin, Christophe Leclercq, Vincent Galand, Raphaël P Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following implantation/replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patients are legally subjected to variable lengths of driving restrictions based on the indication (1 and 3 months after primary and secondary prevention, respectively; 1 week after device replacement).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period in a large cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary or secondary prevention or device replacement between 2015 and 2021 were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period, as defined by guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 914 patients were analysed, including 654 first implantations (438 and 216 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively) and 260 device replacements. The primary outcome occurred in 2/438 patients (0.004%) during the 1-month period following device implantation for primary prevention and in 25/216 patients (11.5%) during the 3-month period following device implantation for secondary prevention; it did not occur in the 1-week period following device replacement. The monthly calculated risk of harm remained below the accepted threshold of 0.005% for each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary prevention patients, such as those who have undergone device replacement, have a low risk of ventricular arrhythmia, which could lead to a reduction in their driving restriction period. Secondary prevention patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, supporting the 3-month driving restriction period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:植入/更换植入式心律转复除颤器后,根据适应症,患者在法律上会受到长短不一的驾驶限制(一级预防和二级预防后分别为 1 个月和 3 个月;设备更换后为 1 周)。目的:评估一大批患者在理论上的驾驶限制期内室性心律失常的发生率:回顾性纳入2015年至2021年间因一级或二级预防或设备更换而接受植入式心律转复除颤器植入术的患者。主要终点是在指南规定的理论限驾期内发生室性心律失常的情况:共分析了 914 例患者,包括 654 例首次植入(438 例用于一级预防,216 例用于二级预防)和 260 例装置更换。2/438例患者(0.004%)在植入装置用于一级预防后的1个月内出现了主要结果,25/216例患者(11.5%)在植入装置用于二级预防后的3个月内出现了主要结果;在更换装置后的1周内没有出现主要结果。各组每月计算出的危害风险仍低于公认的阈值 0.005%:一级预防患者,如更换过装置的患者,室性心律失常的风险较低,因此可以缩短其驾驶限制期。二级预防患者复发室性心律失常的风险较高,因此需要3个月的驾驶限制期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation or replacement, and driving restriction consequences.

Background: Following implantation/replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patients are legally subjected to variable lengths of driving restrictions based on the indication (1 and 3 months after primary and secondary prevention, respectively; 1 week after device replacement).

Aim: To assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period in a large cohort of patients.

Methods: Patients who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary or secondary prevention or device replacement between 2015 and 2021 were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia during the theoretical driving restriction period, as defined by guidelines.

Results: A total of 914 patients were analysed, including 654 first implantations (438 and 216 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively) and 260 device replacements. The primary outcome occurred in 2/438 patients (0.004%) during the 1-month period following device implantation for primary prevention and in 25/216 patients (11.5%) during the 3-month period following device implantation for secondary prevention; it did not occur in the 1-week period following device replacement. The monthly calculated risk of harm remained below the accepted threshold of 0.005% for each group.

Conclusions: Primary prevention patients, such as those who have undergone device replacement, have a low risk of ventricular arrhythmia, which could lead to a reduction in their driving restriction period. Secondary prevention patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, supporting the 3-month driving restriction period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信