Urszula Stopka-Farooqui, Vasilis Stavrinides, Benjamin S Simpson, Hania Qureshi, Lina M Carmona Echevierra, Hayley Pye, Zeba Ahmed, Mohammed F Alawami, Jonathan D Kay, Jonathan Olivier, Susan Heavey, Dominic Patel, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider, Caroline M Moore, Hashim U Ahmed, Hayley C Whitaker
{"title":"将组织生物标记物与 mpMRI 相结合，诊断具有临床意义的前列腺癌。分析 PICTURE 研究中的 21 种生物标记物。","authors":"Urszula Stopka-Farooqui, Vasilis Stavrinides, Benjamin S Simpson, Hania Qureshi, Lina M Carmona Echevierra, Hayley Pye, Zeba Ahmed, Mohammed F Alawami, Jonathan D Kay, Jonathan Olivier, Susan Heavey, Dominic Patel, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider, Caroline M Moore, Hashim U Ahmed, Hayley C Whitaker","doi":"10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum PSA and digital rectal examination remain the key diagnostic tools for detecting prostate cancer. However, due to the limited specificity of serum PSA, the applicability of this marker continues to be controversial. Recent use of image-guided biopsy along with pathological assessment and the use of biomarkers has dramatically improved the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Despite the two modalities working together for diagnosis biomarker research often fails to correlate findings with imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We looked at 21 prostate cancer biomarkers correlating our results with mpMRI data to investigate the hypothesis that biomarkers along with mpMRI data make a powerful tool to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Biomarkers were selected based on the existing literature. Using a tissue microarray comprised of samples from the PICTURE study, with biopsies at 5 mm intervals and mpMRI data we analysed which biomarkers could differentiate benign and malignant tissue. Biomarker data were also correlated with pathological grading, mpMRI, serum PSA, age and family history. AGR2, CD10 and EGR protein expression was significantly different in both matched malignant and benign tissues. AMACR, ANPEP, GDF15, MSMB, PSMA, PTEN, TBL1XR1, TP63, VPS13A and VPS28 showed significantly different expression between Gleason grades in malignant tissue. The majority of the biomarkers tested did not correlate with mpMRI data. However, CD10, KHDRBS3, PCLAF, PSMA, SIK2 and GDF15 were differentially expressed with prostate cancer progression. AMACR and PTEN were identified in both pathological and image data evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high demand to develop biomarkers that would help the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Tissue biomarkers are of particular interest since immunohistochemistry remains a cheap, reliable method that is widely available in pathology departments. These results demonstrate that testing biomarkers in a cohort consistent with the current diagnostic pathway is crucial to identifying biomarker with potential clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study.\",\"authors\":\"Urszula Stopka-Farooqui, Vasilis Stavrinides, Benjamin S Simpson, Hania Qureshi, Lina M Carmona Echevierra, Hayley Pye, Zeba Ahmed, Mohammed F Alawami, Jonathan D Kay, Jonathan Olivier, Susan Heavey, Dominic Patel, Alex Freeman, Aiman Haider, Caroline M Moore, Hashim U Ahmed, Hayley C Whitaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum PSA and digital rectal examination remain the key diagnostic tools for detecting prostate cancer. However, due to the limited specificity of serum PSA, the applicability of this marker continues to be controversial. Recent use of image-guided biopsy along with pathological assessment and the use of biomarkers has dramatically improved the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Despite the two modalities working together for diagnosis biomarker research often fails to correlate findings with imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We looked at 21 prostate cancer biomarkers correlating our results with mpMRI data to investigate the hypothesis that biomarkers along with mpMRI data make a powerful tool to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Biomarkers were selected based on the existing literature. Using a tissue microarray comprised of samples from the PICTURE study, with biopsies at 5 mm intervals and mpMRI data we analysed which biomarkers could differentiate benign and malignant tissue. Biomarker data were also correlated with pathological grading, mpMRI, serum PSA, age and family history. AGR2, CD10 and EGR protein expression was significantly different in both matched malignant and benign tissues. AMACR, ANPEP, GDF15, MSMB, PSMA, PTEN, TBL1XR1, TP63, VPS13A and VPS28 showed significantly different expression between Gleason grades in malignant tissue. The majority of the biomarkers tested did not correlate with mpMRI data. However, CD10, KHDRBS3, PCLAF, PSMA, SIK2 and GDF15 were differentially expressed with prostate cancer progression. AMACR and PTEN were identified in both pathological and image data evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high demand to develop biomarkers that would help the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Tissue biomarkers are of particular interest since immunohistochemistry remains a cheap, reliable method that is widely available in pathology departments. These results demonstrate that testing biomarkers in a cohort consistent with the current diagnostic pathway is crucial to identifying biomarker with potential clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00920-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study.
Background: Serum PSA and digital rectal examination remain the key diagnostic tools for detecting prostate cancer. However, due to the limited specificity of serum PSA, the applicability of this marker continues to be controversial. Recent use of image-guided biopsy along with pathological assessment and the use of biomarkers has dramatically improved the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Despite the two modalities working together for diagnosis biomarker research often fails to correlate findings with imaging.
Methods and results: We looked at 21 prostate cancer biomarkers correlating our results with mpMRI data to investigate the hypothesis that biomarkers along with mpMRI data make a powerful tool to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Biomarkers were selected based on the existing literature. Using a tissue microarray comprised of samples from the PICTURE study, with biopsies at 5 mm intervals and mpMRI data we analysed which biomarkers could differentiate benign and malignant tissue. Biomarker data were also correlated with pathological grading, mpMRI, serum PSA, age and family history. AGR2, CD10 and EGR protein expression was significantly different in both matched malignant and benign tissues. AMACR, ANPEP, GDF15, MSMB, PSMA, PTEN, TBL1XR1, TP63, VPS13A and VPS28 showed significantly different expression between Gleason grades in malignant tissue. The majority of the biomarkers tested did not correlate with mpMRI data. However, CD10, KHDRBS3, PCLAF, PSMA, SIK2 and GDF15 were differentially expressed with prostate cancer progression. AMACR and PTEN were identified in both pathological and image data evaluation.
Conclusions: There is a high demand to develop biomarkers that would help the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Tissue biomarkers are of particular interest since immunohistochemistry remains a cheap, reliable method that is widely available in pathology departments. These results demonstrate that testing biomarkers in a cohort consistent with the current diagnostic pathway is crucial to identifying biomarker with potential clinical utility.
期刊介绍：
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
