赛拉司琼和依达拉奉在婴儿痉挛症多发大鼠模型中的疗效和耐受性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Oleksii Shandra , Yongjun Wang , Lisa D. Coles , Wenzhu B. Mowrey , Qianyun Li , Wei Liu , Solomon L. Moshé , Aristea S. Galanopoulou
{"title":"赛拉司琼和依达拉奉在婴儿痉挛症多发大鼠模型中的疗效和耐受性。","authors":"Oleksii Shandra ,&nbsp;Yongjun Wang ,&nbsp;Lisa D. Coles ,&nbsp;Wenzhu B. Mowrey ,&nbsp;Qianyun Li ,&nbsp;Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Solomon L. Moshé ,&nbsp;Aristea S. Galanopoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test whether anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs that inhibit the nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB), celastrol and edaravone, suppress spasms and improve developmental outcomes in the multiple-hit rat model of refractory infantile spasms (IS) due to structural lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Postnatal day 3 (PN3) Sprague-Dawley rats were treated according to the multiple-hit IS model protocol. Using a randomized, blinded, vehicle-controlled, dose- and time-response study design, we tested the effects of single celastrol [1, 2, or 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.), 10–14 rats/group] or edaravone (1, 10 or 30 mg/kg i.p., 14–17 rats/group) injections vs their vehicles on behavioral and electroclinical spasms and developmental milestones. Video-EEG monitoring was done on PN6-7 (n = 11–12 rats/group). Pulse celastrol treatment effects (PN4: 4 mg/kg, PN5-6: 2 mg/kg/day i.p.) were determined on spasms, developmental milestones and Barnes maze. Celastrol and edaravone pharmacokinetics in plasma and neocortex were assessed. Linear mixed model analysis of raw or normalized log-transformed spasm frequencies, considering repeated observations was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Single (2–4 mg/kg i.p) or pulse celastrol, but not edaravone, reduced behavioral and electroclinical spasms frequencies within 5hrs. Pulse celastrol did not affect spasm-freedom, survival, developmental milestones or Barnes maze performance. Celastrol had erratic i.p. absorption with maximum concentrations observed between 2–4 h, when effects on spasms were seen. Edaravone had low blood-to-brain permeability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Celastrol’s efficacy on spasms is partially explained by its better brain penetration than edaravone’s. NFkB inhibitors may be useful in treating drug-resistant IS but delivery methods with improved bioavailability and brain permeability are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 110159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and tolerability of celastrol and edaravone in the multiple-hit rat model of infantile spasms\",\"authors\":\"Oleksii Shandra ,&nbsp;Yongjun Wang ,&nbsp;Lisa D. Coles ,&nbsp;Wenzhu B. Mowrey ,&nbsp;Qianyun Li ,&nbsp;Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Solomon L. Moshé ,&nbsp;Aristea S. Galanopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test whether anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs that inhibit the nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB), celastrol and edaravone, suppress spasms and improve developmental outcomes in the multiple-hit rat model of refractory infantile spasms (IS) due to structural lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Postnatal day 3 (PN3) Sprague-Dawley rats were treated according to the multiple-hit IS model protocol. Using a randomized, blinded, vehicle-controlled, dose- and time-response study design, we tested the effects of single celastrol [1, 2, or 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.), 10–14 rats/group] or edaravone (1, 10 or 30 mg/kg i.p., 14–17 rats/group) injections vs their vehicles on behavioral and electroclinical spasms and developmental milestones. Video-EEG monitoring was done on PN6-7 (n = 11–12 rats/group). Pulse celastrol treatment effects (PN4: 4 mg/kg, PN5-6: 2 mg/kg/day i.p.) were determined on spasms, developmental milestones and Barnes maze. Celastrol and edaravone pharmacokinetics in plasma and neocortex were assessed. Linear mixed model analysis of raw or normalized log-transformed spasm frequencies, considering repeated observations was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Single (2–4 mg/kg i.p) or pulse celastrol, but not edaravone, reduced behavioral and electroclinical spasms frequencies within 5hrs. Pulse celastrol did not affect spasm-freedom, survival, developmental milestones or Barnes maze performance. Celastrol had erratic i.p. absorption with maximum concentrations observed between 2–4 h, when effects on spasms were seen. Edaravone had low blood-to-brain permeability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Celastrol’s efficacy on spasms is partially explained by its better brain penetration than edaravone’s. NFkB inhibitors may be useful in treating drug-resistant IS but delivery methods with improved bioavailability and brain permeability are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024005419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024005419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的检测抑制活化B细胞核因子卡巴轻链增强子(NF-kB)的抗炎和抗氧化药物西司他洛尔(celastrol)和依达拉奉(edaravone)是否能抑制因结构性病变导致的难治性婴儿痉挛(IS)多重打击大鼠模型的痉挛并改善其发育结果:出生后第 3 天(PN3)的 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠按照多击 IS 模型方案进行治疗。我们采用随机、盲法、载体对照、剂量和时间反应研究设计,测试了单次腹腔注射西司他醇(1、2或4毫克/千克,10-14只/组)或依达拉奉(1、10或30毫克/千克,14-17只/组)对行为和电临床痉挛以及发育里程碑的影响。对PN6-7(n = 11-12只/组)进行了视频脑电图监测。脉冲西司他醇治疗(PN4:4 毫克/千克,PN5-6:2 毫克/千克/天,静脉注射)对痉挛、发育里程碑和巴恩斯迷宫的影响。评估了血浆和新皮层中的塞拉斯托和依达拉奉药代动力学。考虑到重复观察,采用线性混合模型分析原始或归一化对数变换的痉挛频率:结果:单次(2-4 毫克/千克 i.p.)或脉冲塞拉司琼(而非依达拉奉)可在 5 小时内降低行为和电临床痉挛频率。脉冲西司他醇不会影响痉挛自由度、存活率、发育里程碑或巴恩斯迷宫表现。西司他洛尔的静脉吸收不稳定,2-4 小时内浓度最高,此时对痉挛的影响显现出来。依达拉奉的血脑通透性较低:结论:塞拉斯特龙对痉挛的疗效部分归因于其比依达拉奉更好的脑渗透性。NFkB抑制剂可能有助于治疗耐药的IS,但需要改进生物利用度和脑渗透性的给药方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and tolerability of celastrol and edaravone in the multiple-hit rat model of infantile spasms

Objective

To test whether anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs that inhibit the nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB), celastrol and edaravone, suppress spasms and improve developmental outcomes in the multiple-hit rat model of refractory infantile spasms (IS) due to structural lesions.

Methods

Postnatal day 3 (PN3) Sprague-Dawley rats were treated according to the multiple-hit IS model protocol. Using a randomized, blinded, vehicle-controlled, dose- and time-response study design, we tested the effects of single celastrol [1, 2, or 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.), 10–14 rats/group] or edaravone (1, 10 or 30 mg/kg i.p., 14–17 rats/group) injections vs their vehicles on behavioral and electroclinical spasms and developmental milestones. Video-EEG monitoring was done on PN6-7 (n = 11–12 rats/group). Pulse celastrol treatment effects (PN4: 4 mg/kg, PN5-6: 2 mg/kg/day i.p.) were determined on spasms, developmental milestones and Barnes maze. Celastrol and edaravone pharmacokinetics in plasma and neocortex were assessed. Linear mixed model analysis of raw or normalized log-transformed spasm frequencies, considering repeated observations was used.

Results

Single (2–4 mg/kg i.p) or pulse celastrol, but not edaravone, reduced behavioral and electroclinical spasms frequencies within 5hrs. Pulse celastrol did not affect spasm-freedom, survival, developmental milestones or Barnes maze performance. Celastrol had erratic i.p. absorption with maximum concentrations observed between 2–4 h, when effects on spasms were seen. Edaravone had low blood-to-brain permeability.

Conclusions

Celastrol’s efficacy on spasms is partially explained by its better brain penetration than edaravone’s. NFkB inhibitors may be useful in treating drug-resistant IS but delivery methods with improved bioavailability and brain permeability are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信