组织结构及其与警官正义观的联系

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Eric G. Lambert, Hanif Qureshi, Nancy L. Hogan, David White, James Frank
{"title":"组织结构及其与警官正义观的联系","authors":"Eric G. Lambert,&nbsp;Hanif Qureshi,&nbsp;Nancy L. Hogan,&nbsp;David White,&nbsp;James Frank","doi":"10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on how different workplace variables relate to perceptions of organizational justice for police officers is almost absent from the literature. To fill this void, the current study examined the impact of input into decision-making, formalization, instrumental communication, and organizational support on the distributive and procedural justice views of police officers from the Haryana State of India. Based on the social exchange theory’s principle of reciprocity, these variables should result in favorable views of the organization, and, in turn, should raise views of the police organization’s justice efforts. Measures of distributive justice, procedural justice for promotions, and procedural justice for evaluations were created. Input, formalization, support, and communication had significant associations with higher distributive justice and procedural justice for evaluation views. Formalization, communication, and support had significant associations with higher views of procedural justice for promotions, but input had a nonsignificant relationship. The findings from this study offer police administrators a low cost and practical solution for enhancing organizational justice views of officers by increasing the level of input, formalization, support, and communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"19 4","pages":"593 - 616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Structure and Its Connection with the Justice Views of Police Officers\",\"authors\":\"Eric G. Lambert,&nbsp;Hanif Qureshi,&nbsp;Nancy L. Hogan,&nbsp;David White,&nbsp;James Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research on how different workplace variables relate to perceptions of organizational justice for police officers is almost absent from the literature. To fill this void, the current study examined the impact of input into decision-making, formalization, instrumental communication, and organizational support on the distributive and procedural justice views of police officers from the Haryana State of India. Based on the social exchange theory’s principle of reciprocity, these variables should result in favorable views of the organization, and, in turn, should raise views of the police organization’s justice efforts. Measures of distributive justice, procedural justice for promotions, and procedural justice for evaluations were created. Input, formalization, support, and communication had significant associations with higher distributive justice and procedural justice for evaluation views. Formalization, communication, and support had significant associations with higher views of procedural justice for promotions, but input had a nonsignificant relationship. The findings from this study offer police administrators a low cost and practical solution for enhancing organizational justice views of officers by increasing the level of input, formalization, support, and communication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"593 - 616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于不同工作场所变量与警官组织正义感之间关系的研究在文献中几乎是空白。为了填补这一空白,本研究考察了决策投入、正规化、工具性沟通和组织支持对印度哈里亚纳邦警察的分配公正和程序公正观念的影响。根据社会交换理论的互惠原则,这些变量应该会使人们对组织产生好感,反过来,也应该会提高人们对警察组织的公正努力的看法。我们建立了分配公正、晋升程序公正和评估程序公正的衡量标准。投入、正规化、支持和沟通与较高的分配公正和评估程序公正有显著的关联。正规化、沟通和支持与较高的晋升程序公正观有显著关联,但投入与之无显著关联。这项研究的结果为警察管理者提供了一个低成本、实用的解决方案,通过提高投入、正规化、支持和沟通的水平来增强警员的组织公正观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational Structure and Its Connection with the Justice Views of Police Officers

Research on how different workplace variables relate to perceptions of organizational justice for police officers is almost absent from the literature. To fill this void, the current study examined the impact of input into decision-making, formalization, instrumental communication, and organizational support on the distributive and procedural justice views of police officers from the Haryana State of India. Based on the social exchange theory’s principle of reciprocity, these variables should result in favorable views of the organization, and, in turn, should raise views of the police organization’s justice efforts. Measures of distributive justice, procedural justice for promotions, and procedural justice for evaluations were created. Input, formalization, support, and communication had significant associations with higher distributive justice and procedural justice for evaluation views. Formalization, communication, and support had significant associations with higher views of procedural justice for promotions, but input had a nonsignificant relationship. The findings from this study offer police administrators a low cost and practical solution for enhancing organizational justice views of officers by increasing the level of input, formalization, support, and communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Criminology
Asian Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信