肉类样品中戊型肝炎病毒 RNA 检测评估:分析前条件的优化

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Guadalupe Di Cola, Anabella C. Fantilli, Gonzalo Rodríguez-Lombardi, Kevin A. Rucci, Gonzalo Castro, Santiago Mirazo, Silvia Viviana Nates, María Belén Pisano, Viviana E. Ré
{"title":"肉类样品中戊型肝炎病毒 RNA 检测评估:分析前条件的优化","authors":"Guadalupe Di Cola,&nbsp;Anabella C. Fantilli,&nbsp;Gonzalo Rodríguez-Lombardi,&nbsp;Kevin A. Rucci,&nbsp;Gonzalo Castro,&nbsp;Santiago Mirazo,&nbsp;Silvia Viviana Nates,&nbsp;María Belén Pisano,&nbsp;Viviana E. Ré","doi":"10.1007/s12560-024-09617-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is primarily transmitted via the fecal–oral route and is considered an anthropozoonosis. Genotypes with zoonotic potential (mainly HEV-3 and HEV-4) can be transmitted through the consumption of raw or undercooked pork, wild boar, deer meat, or processed products. This study aims to explore methodologies for processing meat samples to establish a protocol for HEV detection in meat. The analysis of pre-analytical conditions involved comparing homogenization with PBS versus TRIzol, comparing tissue disruption methods (ultra-turrax versus mortar and pestle), and assessing nucleic acid extraction techniques (spin columns and magnetic beads) across three types of artificially contaminated meat matrices: pork, salmon (fish-meat), and salami. Each test included a process control virus (PP7) and an HEV transcript. Molecular detection was performed via RT-qPCR. Results indicated that TRIzol provided better recovery rates for homogenization, while spin columns were the most effective option for RNA extraction. Both the ultra-turrax homogenizer and the mortar-pestle methods were effective for pork and fish-meat homogenization, while the use of the UT yielded superior results for salami. HEV recovery rates were 36.7%, 26.3%, and 34.1% for salami, salmon, and pork meat, respectively. In conclusion, we reached a simple and reliable protocol for the detection of RNA-HEV from three meat matrices. This method, which includes homogenization with TRIzol, mechanical tissue disruption, and RNA extraction using spin columns followed by real-time PCR, can be applied in future studies to evaluate HEV prevalence in food sources and contribute to the discussion about HEV detection methodologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Hepatitis E Virus RNA Detection in Meat Samples: Optimization of Pre-analytical Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Guadalupe Di Cola,&nbsp;Anabella C. Fantilli,&nbsp;Gonzalo Rodríguez-Lombardi,&nbsp;Kevin A. Rucci,&nbsp;Gonzalo Castro,&nbsp;Santiago Mirazo,&nbsp;Silvia Viviana Nates,&nbsp;María Belén Pisano,&nbsp;Viviana E. Ré\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12560-024-09617-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is primarily transmitted via the fecal–oral route and is considered an anthropozoonosis. Genotypes with zoonotic potential (mainly HEV-3 and HEV-4) can be transmitted through the consumption of raw or undercooked pork, wild boar, deer meat, or processed products. This study aims to explore methodologies for processing meat samples to establish a protocol for HEV detection in meat. The analysis of pre-analytical conditions involved comparing homogenization with PBS versus TRIzol, comparing tissue disruption methods (ultra-turrax versus mortar and pestle), and assessing nucleic acid extraction techniques (spin columns and magnetic beads) across three types of artificially contaminated meat matrices: pork, salmon (fish-meat), and salami. Each test included a process control virus (PP7) and an HEV transcript. Molecular detection was performed via RT-qPCR. Results indicated that TRIzol provided better recovery rates for homogenization, while spin columns were the most effective option for RNA extraction. Both the ultra-turrax homogenizer and the mortar-pestle methods were effective for pork and fish-meat homogenization, while the use of the UT yielded superior results for salami. HEV recovery rates were 36.7%, 26.3%, and 34.1% for salami, salmon, and pork meat, respectively. In conclusion, we reached a simple and reliable protocol for the detection of RNA-HEV from three meat matrices. This method, which includes homogenization with TRIzol, mechanical tissue disruption, and RNA extraction using spin columns followed by real-time PCR, can be applied in future studies to evaluate HEV prevalence in food sources and contribute to the discussion about HEV detection methodologies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-024-09617-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-024-09617-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)主要通过粪-口途径传播,被认为是一种人畜共患疾病。具有人畜共患病潜能的基因型(主要是 HEV-3 和 HEV-4)可通过食用生的或未煮熟的猪肉、野猪肉、鹿肉或加工产品传播。本研究旨在探索处理肉类样本的方法,以制定检测肉类中 HEV 的规程。对分析前条件的分析包括比较用 PBS 和 TRIzol 进行匀浆,比较组织破坏方法(ultra-turrax 和研杵),以及评估猪肉、三文鱼(鱼肉)和萨拉米香肠这三种人工污染肉类基质的核酸提取技术(自旋柱和磁珠)。每项检测都包括过程控制病毒(PP7)和 HEV 转录本。分子检测通过 RT-qPCR 进行。结果表明,TRIzol 的均质化回收率更高,而旋转柱则是提取 RNA 的最有效选择。ultra-turrax 匀浆器和研钵-杵法对猪肉和鱼肉的匀浆都很有效,而使用 UT 对腊肠的匀浆效果更好。腊肠、三文鱼和猪肉的 HEV 回收率分别为 36.7%、26.3% 和 34.1%。总之,我们达成了从三种肉类基质中检测 RNA-HEV 的简单而可靠的方案。这种方法包括用 TRIzol 匀浆、机械破坏组织、使用旋转柱提取 RNA 然后进行实时 PCR,可用于未来的研究,以评估食物来源中 HEV 的流行情况,并为有关 HEV 检测方法的讨论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Hepatitis E Virus RNA Detection in Meat Samples: Optimization of Pre-analytical Conditions

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is primarily transmitted via the fecal–oral route and is considered an anthropozoonosis. Genotypes with zoonotic potential (mainly HEV-3 and HEV-4) can be transmitted through the consumption of raw or undercooked pork, wild boar, deer meat, or processed products. This study aims to explore methodologies for processing meat samples to establish a protocol for HEV detection in meat. The analysis of pre-analytical conditions involved comparing homogenization with PBS versus TRIzol, comparing tissue disruption methods (ultra-turrax versus mortar and pestle), and assessing nucleic acid extraction techniques (spin columns and magnetic beads) across three types of artificially contaminated meat matrices: pork, salmon (fish-meat), and salami. Each test included a process control virus (PP7) and an HEV transcript. Molecular detection was performed via RT-qPCR. Results indicated that TRIzol provided better recovery rates for homogenization, while spin columns were the most effective option for RNA extraction. Both the ultra-turrax homogenizer and the mortar-pestle methods were effective for pork and fish-meat homogenization, while the use of the UT yielded superior results for salami. HEV recovery rates were 36.7%, 26.3%, and 34.1% for salami, salmon, and pork meat, respectively. In conclusion, we reached a simple and reliable protocol for the detection of RNA-HEV from three meat matrices. This method, which includes homogenization with TRIzol, mechanical tissue disruption, and RNA extraction using spin columns followed by real-time PCR, can be applied in future studies to evaluate HEV prevalence in food sources and contribute to the discussion about HEV detection methodologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Environmental Virology
Food and Environmental Virology ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信