Tania M. Kenyon, Karen Eigeland, Kennedy Wolfe, Roima Paewai-Huggins, Devin Rowell, Tanya Dodgen, Peter J. Mumby
{"title":"珊瑚礁上的物质遗产:碎屑长度和礁床厚度是碎屑礁床恢复的关键因素","authors":"Tania M. Kenyon, Karen Eigeland, Kennedy Wolfe, Roima Paewai-Huggins, Devin Rowell, Tanya Dodgen, Peter J. Mumby","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Disturbances on coral reefs—which are increasing in intensity and frequency—generate material legacies. These are commonly in the form of rubble beds, which depend on rubble stability and/or binding to facilitate coral recruitment and recovery. Yet, our understanding of rubble stability and binding dynamics across environmental gradients is limited. Characterising and categorising rubble material legacies in context of their likely recovery trajectory is imperative to the effective deployment of active intervention strategies used to restore degraded reefs, such as rubble stabilisation, coral outplanting and larval seeding techniques. We quantified rubble characteristics across environmental gradients on the Great Barrier Reef. The likelihood of rubble stability and binding increased with rubble length and rubble bed thickness, and rubble length was a good predictor of bed thickness and rubble branchiness. Thin rubble bed profiles (< ~10 cm depth), those with small, unbranched rubble pieces (< ~10 cm length), and beds at the base of sloped rubble screes, had lower stability and binding likelihoods. These kinds of beds are expected to persist with low recovery prospects, and could be good candidates for rubble stabilisation interventions. Thicker rubble beds with larger, branched rubble pieces tended to exhibit higher stability and binding likelihoods. However, these beds had nuanced effects on coral cover, and interventions may still be necessary where competition is high, for example from macroalgae. A rapid assessment of rubble length—while also considering shelf location, geomorphic zone, slope angle and underlying substrate—can indicate the potential direction of a rubble bed's recovery trajectory. Our findings have been summarised into a rapid rubble bed assessment tool available in the Supporting Information, that can be incorporated into current reef monitoring to optimize prioritisation of intervention strategies at disturbed sites.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"30 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Legacies on Coral Reefs: Rubble Length and Bed Thickness Are Key Drivers of Rubble Bed Recovery\",\"authors\":\"Tania M. Kenyon, Karen Eigeland, Kennedy Wolfe, Roima Paewai-Huggins, Devin Rowell, Tanya Dodgen, Peter J. Mumby\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.17574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Disturbances on coral reefs—which are increasing in intensity and frequency—generate material legacies. These are commonly in the form of rubble beds, which depend on rubble stability and/or binding to facilitate coral recruitment and recovery. Yet, our understanding of rubble stability and binding dynamics across environmental gradients is limited. Characterising and categorising rubble material legacies in context of their likely recovery trajectory is imperative to the effective deployment of active intervention strategies used to restore degraded reefs, such as rubble stabilisation, coral outplanting and larval seeding techniques. We quantified rubble characteristics across environmental gradients on the Great Barrier Reef. The likelihood of rubble stability and binding increased with rubble length and rubble bed thickness, and rubble length was a good predictor of bed thickness and rubble branchiness. Thin rubble bed profiles (< ~10 cm depth), those with small, unbranched rubble pieces (< ~10 cm length), and beds at the base of sloped rubble screes, had lower stability and binding likelihoods. These kinds of beds are expected to persist with low recovery prospects, and could be good candidates for rubble stabilisation interventions. Thicker rubble beds with larger, branched rubble pieces tended to exhibit higher stability and binding likelihoods. However, these beds had nuanced effects on coral cover, and interventions may still be necessary where competition is high, for example from macroalgae. A rapid assessment of rubble length—while also considering shelf location, geomorphic zone, slope angle and underlying substrate—can indicate the potential direction of a rubble bed's recovery trajectory. Our findings have been summarised into a rapid rubble bed assessment tool available in the Supporting Information, that can be incorporated into current reef monitoring to optimize prioritisation of intervention strategies at disturbed sites.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"30 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17574\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Material Legacies on Coral Reefs: Rubble Length and Bed Thickness Are Key Drivers of Rubble Bed Recovery
Disturbances on coral reefs—which are increasing in intensity and frequency—generate material legacies. These are commonly in the form of rubble beds, which depend on rubble stability and/or binding to facilitate coral recruitment and recovery. Yet, our understanding of rubble stability and binding dynamics across environmental gradients is limited. Characterising and categorising rubble material legacies in context of their likely recovery trajectory is imperative to the effective deployment of active intervention strategies used to restore degraded reefs, such as rubble stabilisation, coral outplanting and larval seeding techniques. We quantified rubble characteristics across environmental gradients on the Great Barrier Reef. The likelihood of rubble stability and binding increased with rubble length and rubble bed thickness, and rubble length was a good predictor of bed thickness and rubble branchiness. Thin rubble bed profiles (< ~10 cm depth), those with small, unbranched rubble pieces (< ~10 cm length), and beds at the base of sloped rubble screes, had lower stability and binding likelihoods. These kinds of beds are expected to persist with low recovery prospects, and could be good candidates for rubble stabilisation interventions. Thicker rubble beds with larger, branched rubble pieces tended to exhibit higher stability and binding likelihoods. However, these beds had nuanced effects on coral cover, and interventions may still be necessary where competition is high, for example from macroalgae. A rapid assessment of rubble length—while also considering shelf location, geomorphic zone, slope angle and underlying substrate—can indicate the potential direction of a rubble bed's recovery trajectory. Our findings have been summarised into a rapid rubble bed assessment tool available in the Supporting Information, that can be incorporated into current reef monitoring to optimize prioritisation of intervention strategies at disturbed sites.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.