荷兰 75 岁及以上社区居民因体弱和残疾而使用医疗服务的预测。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
T van der Ploeg, R J J Gobbens
{"title":"荷兰 75 岁及以上社区居民因体弱和残疾而使用医疗服务的预测。","authors":"T van der Ploeg, R J J Gobbens","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population aging is occurring worldwide. As a result, frailty and disability are in the full interest of practice, policy, and science. An increase in healthcare utilization is an adverse outcome of frailty and disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was the prediction of six indicators of healthcare utilization by frailty and disability measures. The six indicators of healthcare utilization of interest were: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a sample of 484 people that was randomly drawn from the municipality of Roosendaal (the Netherlands), a municipality with 78,000 inhabitants. A subset of people who completed the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) at baseline and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) questionnaires was used with a nine-year followup. We used generalized estimation equations (GEE) to predict the six indicators with the frailty measures (physical, psychological, and social scores) and disability measures (ADL and IADL scores). We also performed GEE analyses adjusted for age, gender, and multimorbidity from part A of the TFI at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significant predictors were different for each indicator. However, the physical frailty score, the ADL score, and the IADL score often emerged as significant predictors. These three variables predicted several indicators of healthcare utilization: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals. The social score was found to be significant for the indicator use of disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our study showed that in particular physical frailty, and ADL and IADL disability predicted healthcare utilization in community-dwelling people aged 75 years or older. It is important that care and welfare professionals pay attention to physical frailty and both ADL and IADL disability aiming to diminish frailty and disability and preventing intensive healthcare utilization and related costs. Future research will have to focus on more representative Dutch municipalities in order to get a more reliable and accurate picture of the disciplines used by people with frailty and disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"474-479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prediction of Healthcare Utilization by Frailty and Disability among Dutch Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 Years or Older.\",\"authors\":\"T van der Ploeg, R J J Gobbens\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population aging is occurring worldwide. As a result, frailty and disability are in the full interest of practice, policy, and science. An increase in healthcare utilization is an adverse outcome of frailty and disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was the prediction of six indicators of healthcare utilization by frailty and disability measures. The six indicators of healthcare utilization of interest were: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a sample of 484 people that was randomly drawn from the municipality of Roosendaal (the Netherlands), a municipality with 78,000 inhabitants. A subset of people who completed the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) at baseline and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) questionnaires was used with a nine-year followup. We used generalized estimation equations (GEE) to predict the six indicators with the frailty measures (physical, psychological, and social scores) and disability measures (ADL and IADL scores). We also performed GEE analyses adjusted for age, gender, and multimorbidity from part A of the TFI at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significant predictors were different for each indicator. However, the physical frailty score, the ADL score, and the IADL score often emerged as significant predictors. These three variables predicted several indicators of healthcare utilization: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals. The social score was found to be significant for the indicator use of disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our study showed that in particular physical frailty, and ADL and IADL disability predicted healthcare utilization in community-dwelling people aged 75 years or older. It is important that care and welfare professionals pay attention to physical frailty and both ADL and IADL disability aiming to diminish frailty and disability and preventing intensive healthcare utilization and related costs. Future research will have to focus on more representative Dutch municipalities in order to get a more reliable and accurate picture of the disciplines used by people with frailty and disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"474-479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人口老龄化正在全球范围内发生。因此,虚弱和残疾问题受到了实践、政策和科学界的广泛关注。医疗保健使用率的增加是体弱和残疾的一个不良后果:本研究的目的是通过虚弱和残疾度量来预测医疗保健使用率的六项指标。本研究的目的是通过虚弱程度和残疾度量来预测医疗保健利用率的六项指标,这六项指标是:使用非正式护理、看全科医生的次数、入院、接受护理、接受个人护理以及与(医疗)保健专业人员的接触:我们从荷兰罗森达尔市(Roosendaal)随机抽取了 484 人作为样本,该市共有 78,000 名居民。我们对基线完成蒂尔堡虚弱指标(Tilburg Frailty Indicator,TFI)和格罗宁根活动受限量表(Groningen Activity Restriction Scale,GARS)问卷调查的人群进行了为期九年的跟踪调查。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)通过虚弱测量(生理、心理和社交评分)和残疾测量(ADL 和 IADL 评分)来预测这六项指标。我们还根据基线时 TFI A 部分的年龄、性别和多病情况进行了 GEE 分析:每个指标的重要预测因素都不相同。然而,身体虚弱评分、ADL 评分和 IADL 评分往往是重要的预测因素。这三个变量可以预测医疗保健利用率的几个指标:使用非正规护理、看全科医生的次数、入院、接受护理、接受个人护理以及与(医疗)专业人员的接触。研究发现,社会评分对使用学科这一指标有显著影响:总之,我们的研究表明,身体虚弱、ADL 和 IADL 残疾尤其会影响 75 岁或以上社区居民的医疗保健使用率。重要的是,护理和福利专业人员应关注体质虚弱以及日常活动能力和综合活动能力残疾,以减轻体质虚弱和残疾程度,避免大量使用医疗保健服务和相关费用。未来的研究必须以更具代表性的荷兰城市为重点,以便更可靠、更准确地了解体弱和残疾人士所使用的学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prediction of Healthcare Utilization by Frailty and Disability among Dutch Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 Years or Older.

Background: Population aging is occurring worldwide. As a result, frailty and disability are in the full interest of practice, policy, and science. An increase in healthcare utilization is an adverse outcome of frailty and disability.

Objective: The aim of the present study was the prediction of six indicators of healthcare utilization by frailty and disability measures. The six indicators of healthcare utilization of interest were: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals.

Methods: We used a sample of 484 people that was randomly drawn from the municipality of Roosendaal (the Netherlands), a municipality with 78,000 inhabitants. A subset of people who completed the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) at baseline and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) questionnaires was used with a nine-year followup. We used generalized estimation equations (GEE) to predict the six indicators with the frailty measures (physical, psychological, and social scores) and disability measures (ADL and IADL scores). We also performed GEE analyses adjusted for age, gender, and multimorbidity from part A of the TFI at baseline.

Results: The significant predictors were different for each indicator. However, the physical frailty score, the ADL score, and the IADL score often emerged as significant predictors. These three variables predicted several indicators of healthcare utilization: use of informal care, number of visits to a general practitioner, hospital admission, receiving nursing care, receiving personal care, and contacts with (health)care professionals. The social score was found to be significant for the indicator use of disciplines.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our study showed that in particular physical frailty, and ADL and IADL disability predicted healthcare utilization in community-dwelling people aged 75 years or older. It is important that care and welfare professionals pay attention to physical frailty and both ADL and IADL disability aiming to diminish frailty and disability and preventing intensive healthcare utilization and related costs. Future research will have to focus on more representative Dutch municipalities in order to get a more reliable and accurate picture of the disciplines used by people with frailty and disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信