F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton
{"title":"针对患有多种疾病的老年人的多成分干预中的运动模式:系统回顾与叙述综述》。","authors":"F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"341-348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Modalities in Multi-Component Interventions for Older adults with Multi-Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"F Forsyth, C L Soh, N Elks, H Lin, K Bailey, S Rowbotham, J Mant, P Hartley, C Deaton\",\"doi\":\"10.14283/jfa.2024.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"341-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exercise Modalities in Multi-Component Interventions for Older adults with Multi-Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
Background: Exercise is efficacious in older adults, including those with multi-morbidity. However, the optimum mode is not known and there are conflicting findings as regards the types of exercises to recommend. It is postulated that multi-component exercise interventions better meet the needs of older adults who experience multi-morbidity as they more holistically address the range of functional problems they may experience. To date, no review has explored and described in detail what multi-component exercise interventions have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity.
Objectives: To explore the number and types of exercises included within multi-component exercise interventions that have been tested in older adults with multi-morbidity. Secondary objectives were to explore the rationale for selecting particular exercise components within the intervention design and to describe the characteristics of the exercise program.
Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Results: Database searches yielded 51,001 articles; following screening 138 unique interventions were retained for analysis. Across studies, 22 different multi-component combinations were identified, and there was marked variation in frequency, intensity and duration. Few studies describe characteristics that are in line with the preferences or needs of older adults with multi-morbidity. Exercise design decisions were most frequently judged to be based on practitioner intuition/local practice.
Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity within multi-component exercise interventions; which has significant implications for meta-analysis of effects. Interventions do not frequently appear to consider the abilities or needs of those with multi-morbidity, nor do they seem to be attuned to the participation barriers they experience.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons. The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).