联合使用 SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP1 受体激动剂的不良事件报告:来自 FAERS 的真实世界研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chunyan Tian, Zheng Yang, Subei Zhao, Ping Zhang, Rong Li
{"title":"联合使用 SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP1 受体激动剂的不良事件报告:来自 FAERS 的真实世界研究。","authors":"Chunyan Tian,&nbsp;Zheng Yang,&nbsp;Subei Zhao,&nbsp;Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Rong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.numecd.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>We evaluate whether the combination of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor(SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP1RA) disproportionally increases the reporting of adverse events compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>Adverse events related to SGLT2i and GLP1RA were screened and selected, then data from the FAERS was underwent thorough disproportionality analysis. The proportional reporting ratio(PRR) of SGLT2i-related adverse events were compared between patients using SGLT2i alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. Similarly, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events were compared between patients using GLP1RA alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. The results showed that the PRR of SGLT2i-related adverse events including diabetic ketoacidosis(DKA), ketosis, reproductive tract adverse events, urinary tract infection, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using SGLT2i alone, and the signal of fracture was not detected. Likewise, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events including gastrointestinal adverse events, gallbladder and biliary tract disease, pancreatitis, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using GLP1RA alone, the PRR of hyperlipasaemia and hyperamylasaemia increased in the combination therapy and no signal of depression, suicidal and self-injurious behaviour was detected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adverse events reporting are not disproportionally higher among those using both SGLT-2i and GLP1RA compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49722,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"35 1","pages":"Article 103758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse event reporting of combining SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP1 receptor agonist: A real-world study from FAERS\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Tian,&nbsp;Zheng Yang,&nbsp;Subei Zhao,&nbsp;Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.numecd.2024.09.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>We evaluate whether the combination of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor(SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP1RA) disproportionally increases the reporting of adverse events compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>Adverse events related to SGLT2i and GLP1RA were screened and selected, then data from the FAERS was underwent thorough disproportionality analysis. The proportional reporting ratio(PRR) of SGLT2i-related adverse events were compared between patients using SGLT2i alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. Similarly, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events were compared between patients using GLP1RA alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. The results showed that the PRR of SGLT2i-related adverse events including diabetic ketoacidosis(DKA), ketosis, reproductive tract adverse events, urinary tract infection, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using SGLT2i alone, and the signal of fracture was not detected. Likewise, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events including gastrointestinal adverse events, gallbladder and biliary tract disease, pancreatitis, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using GLP1RA alone, the PRR of hyperlipasaemia and hyperamylasaemia increased in the combination therapy and no signal of depression, suicidal and self-injurious behaviour was detected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adverse events reporting are not disproportionally higher among those using both SGLT-2i and GLP1RA compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 103758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939475324003776\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939475324003776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们评估了在美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中,钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RA)的联合治疗与SGLT2i或GLP1RA单药治疗相比是否会不成比例地增加不良事件的报告:筛选出与 SGLT2i 和 GLP1RA 相关的不良事件,然后对来自 FAERS 的数据进行全面的比例失调分析。比较了单独使用 SGLT2i 和同时使用 SGLT2i 和 GLP1RA 的患者发生 SGLT2i 相关不良事件的比例报告比(PRR)。同样,比较了单独使用 GLP1RA 的患者与同时使用 SGLT2i 和 GLP1RA 的患者之间 GLP1RA 相关不良事件的 PRR。结果显示,与单独使用 SGLT2i 的患者相比,同时使用 SGLT2i 和 GLP1RA 的患者发生 SGLT2i 相关不良事件(包括糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)、酮症酸中毒、生殖道不良事件、尿路感染和其他不良事件)的 PRR 均有所下降,且未发现骨折信号。同样,与单独使用 GLP1RA 的患者相比,同时使用 SGLT2i 和 GLP1RA 的患者发生 GLP1RA 相关不良事件(包括胃肠道不良事件、胆囊和胆道疾病、胰腺炎和其他不良事件)的 PRR 有所下降,联合疗法中发生高脂血症和高淀粉血症的 PRR 有所上升,未发现抑郁、自杀和自伤行为的信号:结论:与 SGLT2i 或 GLP1RA 单药治疗相比,同时使用 SGLT-2i 和 GLP1RA 的患者报告的不良事件并没有不成比例地增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse event reporting of combining SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP1 receptor agonist: A real-world study from FAERS

Background and aims

We evaluate whether the combination of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor(SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP1RA) disproportionally increases the reporting of adverse events compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Methods and results

Adverse events related to SGLT2i and GLP1RA were screened and selected, then data from the FAERS was underwent thorough disproportionality analysis. The proportional reporting ratio(PRR) of SGLT2i-related adverse events were compared between patients using SGLT2i alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. Similarly, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events were compared between patients using GLP1RA alone and those using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA. The results showed that the PRR of SGLT2i-related adverse events including diabetic ketoacidosis(DKA), ketosis, reproductive tract adverse events, urinary tract infection, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using SGLT2i alone, and the signal of fracture was not detected. Likewise, the PRR of GLP1RA-related adverse events including gastrointestinal adverse events, gallbladder and biliary tract disease, pancreatitis, and other adverse events, decreased in individuals using both SGLT2i and GLP1RA compared with those using GLP1RA alone, the PRR of hyperlipasaemia and hyperamylasaemia increased in the combination therapy and no signal of depression, suicidal and self-injurious behaviour was detected.

Conclusion

Adverse events reporting are not disproportionally higher among those using both SGLT-2i and GLP1RA compared with SGLT2i or GLP1RA monotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
332
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Nutrition, Metabolism & Cardiovascular Diseases is a forum designed to focus on the powerful interplay between nutritional and metabolic alterations, and cardiovascular disorders. It aims to be a highly qualified tool to help refine strategies against the nutrition-related epidemics of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. By presenting original clinical and experimental findings, it introduces readers and authors into a rapidly developing area of clinical and preventive medicine, including also vascular biology. Of particular concern are the origins, the mechanisms and the means to prevent and control diabetes, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and other nutrition-related diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信