为急救服务开发创伤后应激障碍评估量表。

David Lawrence, Wavne Rikkers, Jennifer Bartlett, Sophie Barrett, Rebecca Seth, Miranda Van Hooff, Sharon Lawn
{"title":"为急救服务开发创伤后应激障碍评估量表。","authors":"David Lawrence, Wavne Rikkers, Jennifer Bartlett, Sophie Barrett, Rebecca Seth, Miranda Van Hooff, Sharon Lawn","doi":"10.1080/19338244.2024.2430968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes the development and validation of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Assessment Scale for Emergency Services (PASES). The PASES was developed to address the needs of Australia's first National Mental Health and Wellbeing Study of Police and Emergency Services, <i>Answering the Call (AtC)</i> which covered Police, Ambulance, Fire and Rescue and State Emergency Services personnel. PASES offers several advantages for use in the emergency services sector over other Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) screening scales, including assessment of functional impairment, a dimensional measure of severity which includes identification of sub-threshold cases experiencing distress and impairment, and allowing for experience of cumulative trauma. Analysis of Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) data from a large national sample identified PTSD symptoms that usually co-occur allowing streamlining of the scale with minimal information loss. In a large sample, PASES had high specificity and adequate sensitivity in comparison to self-reported PTSD diagnosis. Data from AtC supported there being a strong dimensional gradient in distress and associated harms, including suicidal behaviors, across the levels of severity of the PASES. In a subsample of 191 fire sector employees who completed both PASES and PCL-5, both scales had equivalent discrimination compared with self-reported diagnosis of PTSD by a mental health professional. The paper also presents population data for Australian volunteer and employed emergency services personnel collected in AtC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93879,"journal":{"name":"Archives of environmental & occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the post-traumatic stress disorder assessment scale for emergency services.\",\"authors\":\"David Lawrence, Wavne Rikkers, Jennifer Bartlett, Sophie Barrett, Rebecca Seth, Miranda Van Hooff, Sharon Lawn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19338244.2024.2430968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper describes the development and validation of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Assessment Scale for Emergency Services (PASES). The PASES was developed to address the needs of Australia's first National Mental Health and Wellbeing Study of Police and Emergency Services, <i>Answering the Call (AtC)</i> which covered Police, Ambulance, Fire and Rescue and State Emergency Services personnel. PASES offers several advantages for use in the emergency services sector over other Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) screening scales, including assessment of functional impairment, a dimensional measure of severity which includes identification of sub-threshold cases experiencing distress and impairment, and allowing for experience of cumulative trauma. Analysis of Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) data from a large national sample identified PTSD symptoms that usually co-occur allowing streamlining of the scale with minimal information loss. In a large sample, PASES had high specificity and adequate sensitivity in comparison to self-reported PTSD diagnosis. Data from AtC supported there being a strong dimensional gradient in distress and associated harms, including suicidal behaviors, across the levels of severity of the PASES. In a subsample of 191 fire sector employees who completed both PASES and PCL-5, both scales had equivalent discrimination compared with self-reported diagnosis of PTSD by a mental health professional. The paper also presents population data for Australian volunteer and employed emergency services personnel collected in AtC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of environmental & occupational health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of environmental & occupational health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2024.2430968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of environmental & occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2024.2430968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了创伤后应激障碍评估量表(PASES)的开发和验证过程。创伤后应激障碍评估量表的开发是为了满足澳大利亚首个针对警察和应急服务人员的国家心理健康和福祉研究--"接听电话"(AtC)--的需要,该研究涵盖了警察、救护车、消防和救援人员以及州应急服务人员。与其他创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查量表相比,创伤后应激障碍筛查量表在应急服务领域的应用具有多项优势,包括功能障碍评估、严重程度维度测量(包括识别出现痛苦和功能障碍的次阈值病例)以及允许累积创伤经历。对来自全国大样本的综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)数据进行分析后发现,创伤后应激障碍的症状通常会同时出现,因此可以在尽量减少信息丢失的情况下简化量表。在大样本中,PASES 与自我报告的创伤后应激障碍诊断相比,具有较高的特异性和足够的敏感性。来自 AtC 的数据证明,在 PASES 的不同严重程度中,痛苦和相关伤害(包括自杀行为)的维度梯度很强。在同时完成 PASES 和 PCL-5 的 191 名消防部门雇员的子样本中,与心理健康专业人员自我报告的创伤后应激障碍诊断结果相比,两个量表的区分度相当。本文还介绍了在 AtC 收集的澳大利亚志愿和受雇应急服务人员的人口数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the post-traumatic stress disorder assessment scale for emergency services.

This paper describes the development and validation of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Assessment Scale for Emergency Services (PASES). The PASES was developed to address the needs of Australia's first National Mental Health and Wellbeing Study of Police and Emergency Services, Answering the Call (AtC) which covered Police, Ambulance, Fire and Rescue and State Emergency Services personnel. PASES offers several advantages for use in the emergency services sector over other Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) screening scales, including assessment of functional impairment, a dimensional measure of severity which includes identification of sub-threshold cases experiencing distress and impairment, and allowing for experience of cumulative trauma. Analysis of Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) data from a large national sample identified PTSD symptoms that usually co-occur allowing streamlining of the scale with minimal information loss. In a large sample, PASES had high specificity and adequate sensitivity in comparison to self-reported PTSD diagnosis. Data from AtC supported there being a strong dimensional gradient in distress and associated harms, including suicidal behaviors, across the levels of severity of the PASES. In a subsample of 191 fire sector employees who completed both PASES and PCL-5, both scales had equivalent discrimination compared with self-reported diagnosis of PTSD by a mental health professional. The paper also presents population data for Australian volunteer and employed emergency services personnel collected in AtC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信