钝性外伤性脾损伤患者早期发现延迟性假动脉瘤的随访策略:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sung Hoon Cho, Gun Woo Kim, Suyeong Hwang, Kyoung Hoon Lim
{"title":"钝性外伤性脾损伤患者早期发现延迟性假动脉瘤的随访策略:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Sung Hoon Cho, Gun Woo Kim, Suyeong Hwang, Kyoung Hoon Lim","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spleen is the most commonly injured solid organ in blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic pseudoaneurysm rupture is associated with a high risk of mortality. Nonoperative management has become the standard treatment for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic injuries. On the other hand, delayed splenic pseudoaneurysms can develop in any patient, and at present, there are no known risk factors that may reliably predict their occurrence. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate strategies for monitoring and managing splenic injuries, especially lower-grade (I-III).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the predictors of pseudo-aneurysm formation following splenic injury and develop follow-up strategies for early detection of pseudoaneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who visited the Level I Trauma Center between January 2013 and December 2022 and were diagnosed with spleen injuries after blunt abdominal trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma spleen injury scale, the splenic injuries were categorized into the following order based on severity: Grade I (<i>n</i> = 57, 17.6%), grade II (<i>n</i> = 114, 35.3%), grade III (<i>n</i> = 89, 27.6%), grade IV (<i>n</i> = 50, 15.5%), and grade V (<i>n</i> = 13, 4.0%). Of a total of 323 patients, 35 underwent splenectomy and 126 underwent angioembolization. 19 underwent delayed angioembolization, and 5 under-went both initial and delayed angioembolization. In 14 patients who had undergone delayed angioembolization, no extravasation or pseudoaneurysm was observed on the initial computed tomography scan. There are no particular patient-related risk factors for the formation of a delayed splenic pseudoaneurysm, which can occur even in a grade I spleen injury or even 21 days after the injury. The mean detection time for a delayed pseudoaneurysm was 6.26 ± 5.4 (1-21, median: 6, interquartile range: 2-9) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend regular follow-up computed tomography scans, including an arterial and portal venous phase, at least 1 week and 1 month after injury in any grade of blunt traumatic spleen injury for the timely detection of delayed pseudoaneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 10","pages":"3163-3170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow-up strategy for early detection of delayed pseudoaneurysms in patients with blunt traumatic spleen injury: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Hoon Cho, Gun Woo Kim, Suyeong Hwang, Kyoung Hoon Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spleen is the most commonly injured solid organ in blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic pseudoaneurysm rupture is associated with a high risk of mortality. Nonoperative management has become the standard treatment for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic injuries. On the other hand, delayed splenic pseudoaneurysms can develop in any patient, and at present, there are no known risk factors that may reliably predict their occurrence. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate strategies for monitoring and managing splenic injuries, especially lower-grade (I-III).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the predictors of pseudo-aneurysm formation following splenic injury and develop follow-up strategies for early detection of pseudoaneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who visited the Level I Trauma Center between January 2013 and December 2022 and were diagnosed with spleen injuries after blunt abdominal trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma spleen injury scale, the splenic injuries were categorized into the following order based on severity: Grade I (<i>n</i> = 57, 17.6%), grade II (<i>n</i> = 114, 35.3%), grade III (<i>n</i> = 89, 27.6%), grade IV (<i>n</i> = 50, 15.5%), and grade V (<i>n</i> = 13, 4.0%). Of a total of 323 patients, 35 underwent splenectomy and 126 underwent angioembolization. 19 underwent delayed angioembolization, and 5 under-went both initial and delayed angioembolization. In 14 patients who had undergone delayed angioembolization, no extravasation or pseudoaneurysm was observed on the initial computed tomography scan. There are no particular patient-related risk factors for the formation of a delayed splenic pseudoaneurysm, which can occur even in a grade I spleen injury or even 21 days after the injury. The mean detection time for a delayed pseudoaneurysm was 6.26 ± 5.4 (1-21, median: 6, interquartile range: 2-9) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend regular follow-up computed tomography scans, including an arterial and portal venous phase, at least 1 week and 1 month after injury in any grade of blunt traumatic spleen injury for the timely detection of delayed pseudoaneurysms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"3163-3170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577410/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脾脏是钝性腹部创伤中最常见的实体器官损伤,脾脏假性动脉瘤破裂有很高的致死风险。非手术治疗已成为血流动力学稳定的脾损伤患者的标准治疗方法。另一方面,任何患者都可能发生延迟性脾假性动脉瘤,目前还没有已知的风险因素可以可靠地预测其发生。目的:确定脾损伤后假性动脉瘤形成的预测因素,并制定早期发现假性动脉瘤的随访策略:我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2022年12月期间在一级创伤中心就诊并被诊断为腹部钝性创伤后脾脏损伤的患者:采用美国创伤外科协会脾脏损伤量表,根据严重程度将脾脏损伤分为以下等级:I级(57人,占17.6%)、II级(114人,占35.3%)、III级(89人,占27.6%)、IV级(50人,占15.5%)和V级(13人,占4.0%)。在总共 323 名患者中,35 人接受了脾切除术,126 人接受了血管栓塞术。19名患者接受了延迟血管栓塞术,5名患者同时接受了初始血管栓塞术和延迟血管栓塞术。在 14 名接受延迟血管栓塞术的患者中,初次计算机断层扫描未发现外渗或假性动脉瘤。延迟性脾假性动脉瘤的形成没有与患者相关的特殊风险因素,即使是 I 级脾损伤或损伤后 21 天也可能发生。延迟性假动脉瘤的平均检测时间为 6.26 ± 5.4(1-21,中位数:6,四分位间范围:2-9)天:我们建议对任何级别的钝性外伤性脾损伤患者在伤后至少 1 周和 1 个月定期进行计算机断层扫描,包括动脉和门静脉相位,以便及时发现延迟性假动脉瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Follow-up strategy for early detection of delayed pseudoaneurysms in patients with blunt traumatic spleen injury: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: The spleen is the most commonly injured solid organ in blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic pseudoaneurysm rupture is associated with a high risk of mortality. Nonoperative management has become the standard treatment for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic injuries. On the other hand, delayed splenic pseudoaneurysms can develop in any patient, and at present, there are no known risk factors that may reliably predict their occurrence. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate strategies for monitoring and managing splenic injuries, especially lower-grade (I-III).

Aim: To determine the predictors of pseudo-aneurysm formation following splenic injury and develop follow-up strategies for early detection of pseudoaneurysms.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who visited the Level I Trauma Center between January 2013 and December 2022 and were diagnosed with spleen injuries after blunt abdominal trauma.

Results: Using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma spleen injury scale, the splenic injuries were categorized into the following order based on severity: Grade I (n = 57, 17.6%), grade II (n = 114, 35.3%), grade III (n = 89, 27.6%), grade IV (n = 50, 15.5%), and grade V (n = 13, 4.0%). Of a total of 323 patients, 35 underwent splenectomy and 126 underwent angioembolization. 19 underwent delayed angioembolization, and 5 under-went both initial and delayed angioembolization. In 14 patients who had undergone delayed angioembolization, no extravasation or pseudoaneurysm was observed on the initial computed tomography scan. There are no particular patient-related risk factors for the formation of a delayed splenic pseudoaneurysm, which can occur even in a grade I spleen injury or even 21 days after the injury. The mean detection time for a delayed pseudoaneurysm was 6.26 ± 5.4 (1-21, median: 6, interquartile range: 2-9) days.

Conclusion: We recommend regular follow-up computed tomography scans, including an arterial and portal venous phase, at least 1 week and 1 month after injury in any grade of blunt traumatic spleen injury for the timely detection of delayed pseudoaneurysms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信