在跨诊断认知行为疗法中,优势的使用与情绪障碍症状的减轻:随机截距交叉滞后面板模型研究。

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1037/pst0000553
Daniel Teplow, Daniella Spencer-Laitt, Laura J Long, Audrey J Hey, Julián D Moreno, Todd J Farchione
{"title":"在跨诊断认知行为疗法中,优势的使用与情绪障碍症状的减轻:随机截距交叉滞后面板模型研究。","authors":"Daniel Teplow, Daniella Spencer-Laitt, Laura J Long, Audrey J Hey, Julián D Moreno, Todd J Farchione","doi":"10.1037/pst0000553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Strengths use, the engagement of positive character traits in everyday contexts, is associated with both positive functioning and symptom reduction. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between strengths use and emotional disorder symptoms (anxiety, stress, and depression) during a randomized clinical trial of the Digital Unified Protocol, a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants (N = 120) completed assessments at four major time points during treatment and at 3-month follow-up. We specified three random-intercept cross-lagged panel model to capture within-person, bidirectional, time-lagged relationships between strengths use and anxiety, stress, and depression, respectively. Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in anxiety at all time points (β = -0.26 to -0.49), while prospective decreases in anxiety were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.25 to -0.36). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in stress at most time points (β = -0.23 to -0.54), while prospective decreases in stress were associated with significant increases in strengths use at Week 4 (β = -0.21) and at follow-up (β = -0.41). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in depression at Week 8 (β = -0.63) and at posttreatment (β = -0.67), while prospective decreases in depression were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.34 to -0.47). Clinical implications of findings are discussed, including the potential role of strengths use as a treatment target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengths use and emotional disorder symptom reduction during a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Teplow, Daniella Spencer-Laitt, Laura J Long, Audrey J Hey, Julián D Moreno, Todd J Farchione\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Strengths use, the engagement of positive character traits in everyday contexts, is associated with both positive functioning and symptom reduction. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between strengths use and emotional disorder symptoms (anxiety, stress, and depression) during a randomized clinical trial of the Digital Unified Protocol, a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants (N = 120) completed assessments at four major time points during treatment and at 3-month follow-up. We specified three random-intercept cross-lagged panel model to capture within-person, bidirectional, time-lagged relationships between strengths use and anxiety, stress, and depression, respectively. Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in anxiety at all time points (β = -0.26 to -0.49), while prospective decreases in anxiety were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.25 to -0.36). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in stress at most time points (β = -0.23 to -0.54), while prospective decreases in stress were associated with significant increases in strengths use at Week 4 (β = -0.21) and at follow-up (β = -0.41). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in depression at Week 8 (β = -0.63) and at posttreatment (β = -0.67), while prospective decreases in depression were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.34 to -0.47). Clinical implications of findings are discussed, including the potential role of strengths use as a treatment target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优势的使用,即在日常情境中发挥积极的性格特征,与积极功能和症状减轻有关。本研究考察了数字统一方案(一种跨诊断认知行为疗法)随机临床试验期间优势运用与情绪障碍症状(焦虑、压力和抑郁)之间的纵向关系。参与者(120 人)在治疗期间的四个主要时间点和 3 个月的随访中完成了评估。我们建立了三个随机截距交叉滞后面板模型,分别捕捉优势使用与焦虑、压力和抑郁之间的人内、双向和时滞关系。在所有时间点上,前瞻性优势使用的增加与焦虑的显著减少相关(β = -0.26至-0.49),而在大多数时间点上,前瞻性焦虑的减少与优势使用的显著增加相关(β = -0.25至-0.36)。在大多数时间点,优势使用的预期增加与压力的显著减少相关(β = -0.23 至 -0.54),而压力的预期减少与第 4 周(β = -0.21)和随访(β = -0.41)时优势使用的显著增加相关。在第 8 周(β = -0.63)和治疗后(β = -0.67),前瞻性优势使用的增加与抑郁的显著减少相关,而抑郁的前瞻性减少与大多数时间点优势使用的显著增加相关(β = -0.34至-0.47)。本文讨论了研究结果的临床意义,包括优势使用作为治疗目标的潜在作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengths use and emotional disorder symptom reduction during a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel model study.

Strengths use, the engagement of positive character traits in everyday contexts, is associated with both positive functioning and symptom reduction. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between strengths use and emotional disorder symptoms (anxiety, stress, and depression) during a randomized clinical trial of the Digital Unified Protocol, a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants (N = 120) completed assessments at four major time points during treatment and at 3-month follow-up. We specified three random-intercept cross-lagged panel model to capture within-person, bidirectional, time-lagged relationships between strengths use and anxiety, stress, and depression, respectively. Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in anxiety at all time points (β = -0.26 to -0.49), while prospective decreases in anxiety were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.25 to -0.36). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in stress at most time points (β = -0.23 to -0.54), while prospective decreases in stress were associated with significant increases in strengths use at Week 4 (β = -0.21) and at follow-up (β = -0.41). Prospective increases in strengths use were associated with significant decreases in depression at Week 8 (β = -0.63) and at posttreatment (β = -0.67), while prospective decreases in depression were associated with significant increases in strengths use at most time points (β = -0.34 to -0.47). Clinical implications of findings are discussed, including the potential role of strengths use as a treatment target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信