埃塞俄比亚受战争蹂躏的提格雷地区医护人员的 COVID-19 感染率及相关因素。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310128
Bisrat Tesfay Abera, Teklay Gebrecherkos, Migbnesh Gebremedhin Weledegebriel, Girmatsion Fisseha Abreha
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚受战争蹂躏的提格雷地区医护人员的 COVID-19 感染率及相关因素。","authors":"Bisrat Tesfay Abera, Teklay Gebrecherkos, Migbnesh Gebremedhin Weledegebriel, Girmatsion Fisseha Abreha","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0310128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has put an enormous encumbrance on the healthcare system and healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, particularly in war-torn areas. As the world strives to end the pandemic, knowing the magnitude of the infection and its contributing factors in fragile settings is critical to prevent further waves of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), a facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 and its associated factors. The study was conducted among 326 unvaccinated HCWs in two hospitals in Tigray, Ethiopia from. The study period was from June 26 to December 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of study participants and the magnitude of COVID-19 while multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess factors affecting COVID-19 infection among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The seroprevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs in the war-torn region of Tigray was 52.4% and 56.5% using Cellex and INNOVA antibody RDTs, respectively. The point prevalence, using Abbot Antigen test, was 14.2%. The overall infection prevention and control practice (IPC) and facility preparedness was poor with >85% of the HCWs reporting not wearing eye goggle/face shield and respirator in activities that needed transmission-based precautions; none of the participants reporting as having separate waste disposal system for COVID-19 cases; and only 56.8% reporting as having an isolation area during the time of testing. In the multivariate analysis, not having isolation area (AOR = 19.6, 95% CI: 7.57-50.78), re-using of personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.54-6.77), being symptomatic (AOE = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.02-5.67), and being a medical doctor, doctor of dental surgery, and anesthetist (AOR = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.05-12.66) were significantly associated with having at least one positive result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shortage of PPE supply, poor IPC practice, suboptimal facility preparedness, and low vaccination coverage in the region contributed to the high rate of COVID-19 infection among HCWs observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0310128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of COVID-19 and associated factors among healthcare workers in the war-torn Tigray, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Bisrat Tesfay Abera, Teklay Gebrecherkos, Migbnesh Gebremedhin Weledegebriel, Girmatsion Fisseha Abreha\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0310128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has put an enormous encumbrance on the healthcare system and healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, particularly in war-torn areas. As the world strives to end the pandemic, knowing the magnitude of the infection and its contributing factors in fragile settings is critical to prevent further waves of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), a facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 and its associated factors. The study was conducted among 326 unvaccinated HCWs in two hospitals in Tigray, Ethiopia from. The study period was from June 26 to December 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of study participants and the magnitude of COVID-19 while multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess factors affecting COVID-19 infection among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The seroprevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs in the war-torn region of Tigray was 52.4% and 56.5% using Cellex and INNOVA antibody RDTs, respectively. The point prevalence, using Abbot Antigen test, was 14.2%. The overall infection prevention and control practice (IPC) and facility preparedness was poor with >85% of the HCWs reporting not wearing eye goggle/face shield and respirator in activities that needed transmission-based precautions; none of the participants reporting as having separate waste disposal system for COVID-19 cases; and only 56.8% reporting as having an isolation area during the time of testing. In the multivariate analysis, not having isolation area (AOR = 19.6, 95% CI: 7.57-50.78), re-using of personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.54-6.77), being symptomatic (AOE = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.02-5.67), and being a medical doctor, doctor of dental surgery, and anesthetist (AOR = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.05-12.66) were significantly associated with having at least one positive result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shortage of PPE supply, poor IPC practice, suboptimal facility preparedness, and low vaccination coverage in the region contributed to the high rate of COVID-19 infection among HCWs observed in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"e0310128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)给全球医疗系统和医疗工作者(HCWs)带来了巨大的负担,尤其是在战乱地区。在全球努力结束这一流行病的同时,了解脆弱环境中的感染规模及其诱因对于防止这一流行病的进一步蔓延至关重要:方法: 通过使用快速诊断测试(RDTs),开展了一项基于设施的横断面研究,以评估 COVID-19 的流行率及其相关因素。研究对象是埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区两家医院的 326 名未接种疫苗的医护人员。研究时间为 2021 年 6 月 26 日至 12 月 31 日。研究采用描述性统计来分析研究参与者的特征和COVID-19的感染程度,同时采用多变量逻辑回归来评估影响HCW感染COVID-19的因素:结果:使用 Cellex 和 INNOVA 抗体 RDT,提格雷战乱地区高危工人的 COVID-19 血清流行率分别为 52.4% 和 56.5%。使用 Abbot 抗原检测的点流行率为 14.2%。总体感染预防与控制实践(IPC)和设施准备情况较差,超过 85% 的医护人员报告在需要采取传播预防措施的活动中没有佩戴护目镜/面罩和呼吸器;没有一名参与者报告对 COVID-19 病例有单独的废物处理系统;只有 56.8% 的参与者报告在检测期间有隔离区。在多变量分析中,没有隔离区(AOR = 19.6,95% CI:7.57-50.78)、重复使用个人防护设备(PPE)(AOR = 3.23,95% CI:1.54-6.77)、无症状(AOE = 2.4,95% CI:1.02-5.67)、医生、牙科医生和麻醉师(AOR = 3.64,95% CI:1.05-12.66)与至少一次阳性结果显著相关:结论:该地区个人防护设备供应短缺、IPC实践差、设施准备不足以及疫苗接种覆盖率低等因素导致了本研究中观察到的医护人员 COVID-19 感染率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of COVID-19 and associated factors among healthcare workers in the war-torn Tigray, Ethiopia.

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has put an enormous encumbrance on the healthcare system and healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, particularly in war-torn areas. As the world strives to end the pandemic, knowing the magnitude of the infection and its contributing factors in fragile settings is critical to prevent further waves of the pandemic.

Methods: Using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), a facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 and its associated factors. The study was conducted among 326 unvaccinated HCWs in two hospitals in Tigray, Ethiopia from. The study period was from June 26 to December 31, 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the characteristics of study participants and the magnitude of COVID-19 while multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess factors affecting COVID-19 infection among HCWs.

Results: The seroprevalence of COVID-19 among HCWs in the war-torn region of Tigray was 52.4% and 56.5% using Cellex and INNOVA antibody RDTs, respectively. The point prevalence, using Abbot Antigen test, was 14.2%. The overall infection prevention and control practice (IPC) and facility preparedness was poor with >85% of the HCWs reporting not wearing eye goggle/face shield and respirator in activities that needed transmission-based precautions; none of the participants reporting as having separate waste disposal system for COVID-19 cases; and only 56.8% reporting as having an isolation area during the time of testing. In the multivariate analysis, not having isolation area (AOR = 19.6, 95% CI: 7.57-50.78), re-using of personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.54-6.77), being symptomatic (AOE = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.02-5.67), and being a medical doctor, doctor of dental surgery, and anesthetist (AOR = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.05-12.66) were significantly associated with having at least one positive result.

Conclusions: Shortage of PPE supply, poor IPC practice, suboptimal facility preparedness, and low vaccination coverage in the region contributed to the high rate of COVID-19 infection among HCWs observed in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信