结直肠肝转移灶根治性切除术后的复发时间和风险:危险函数分析的启示。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jun Kawashima, Miho Akabane, Yutaka Endo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Abdullah Altaf, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Federico Aucejo, Kota Sahara, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"结直肠肝转移灶根治性切除术后的复发时间和风险:危险函数分析的启示。","authors":"Jun Kawashima, Miho Akabane, Yutaka Endo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Abdullah Altaf, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Federico Aucejo, Kota Sahara, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1002/jso.28007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus on the optimal surveillance interval for patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to assess the timing and intensity of recurrence following curative-intent resection of CRLM utilizing a recurrence-free survival (RFS) hazard function analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CRLM who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. The RFS hazard function was used to plot hazard rates and identify the peak of recurrence over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1804 patients, the median RFS was 19.9 months. In the analytic cohort, the RFS hazard curve peaked at 5.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054) and gradually declined, indicative of early recurrence. In subgroup analyses, patients with high and medium tumor burden scores (TBS) had RFS hazard peaks at 4.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.060) and 5.8 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054), respectively. In contrast, patients with low TBS had a later peak at 7.5 months, with the lowest peak hazard rate of 0.047.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recurrence peak for CRLM patients occurred approximately 6 months postsurgery, highlighting the need for intensified early postoperative surveillance. Patients with high TBS experienced earlier recurrence, underscoring the importance of close monitoring, particularly during the first 6 months after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence Timing and Risk Following Curative Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Insights From a Hazard Function Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Kawashima, Miho Akabane, Yutaka Endo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Abdullah Altaf, Andrea Ruzzenente, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, George Poultsides, Kazunari Sasaki, Federico Aucejo, Kota Sahara, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus on the optimal surveillance interval for patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to assess the timing and intensity of recurrence following curative-intent resection of CRLM utilizing a recurrence-free survival (RFS) hazard function analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CRLM who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. The RFS hazard function was used to plot hazard rates and identify the peak of recurrence over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1804 patients, the median RFS was 19.9 months. In the analytic cohort, the RFS hazard curve peaked at 5.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054) and gradually declined, indicative of early recurrence. In subgroup analyses, patients with high and medium tumor burden scores (TBS) had RFS hazard peaks at 4.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.060) and 5.8 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054), respectively. In contrast, patients with low TBS had a later peak at 7.5 months, with the lowest peak hazard rate of 0.047.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recurrence peak for CRLM patients occurred approximately 6 months postsurgery, highlighting the need for intensified early postoperative surveillance. Patients with high TBS experienced earlier recurrence, underscoring the importance of close monitoring, particularly during the first 6 months after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对于接受结直肠肝转移瘤(CRLM)切除术的患者的最佳监测间隔时间,目前还没有达成共识。我们试图利用无复发生存率(RFS)危险函数分析法评估CRLM根治性切除术后复发的时间和强度:方法:我们从一个多机构数据库中找到了接受根治性切除术的 CRLM 患者。结果:在1804例患者中,中位无复发生存期(RFS)为1年:在1804名患者中,中位RFS为19.9个月。在分析队列中,RFS危险曲线在5.9个月时达到峰值(峰值危险率:0.054),随后逐渐下降,表明早期复发。在亚组分析中,高肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)和中等肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)患者的 RFS 危险曲线峰值分别为 4.9 个月(峰值危险率:0.060)和 5.8 个月(峰值危险率:0.054)。相比之下,低TBS患者的风险峰值较晚,为7.5个月,风险峰值最低,为0.047:结论:CRLM 患者的复发高峰出现在术后 6 个月左右,这说明有必要加强术后早期监测。TBS较高的患者复发较早,强调了密切监测的重要性,尤其是在术后的前6个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrence Timing and Risk Following Curative Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Insights From a Hazard Function Analysis.

Introduction: There is no consensus on the optimal surveillance interval for patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to assess the timing and intensity of recurrence following curative-intent resection of CRLM utilizing a recurrence-free survival (RFS) hazard function analysis.

Methods: Patients with CRLM who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. The RFS hazard function was used to plot hazard rates and identify the peak of recurrence over time.

Results: Among 1804 patients, the median RFS was 19.9 months. In the analytic cohort, the RFS hazard curve peaked at 5.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054) and gradually declined, indicative of early recurrence. In subgroup analyses, patients with high and medium tumor burden scores (TBS) had RFS hazard peaks at 4.9 months (peak hazard rate: 0.060) and 5.8 months (peak hazard rate: 0.054), respectively. In contrast, patients with low TBS had a later peak at 7.5 months, with the lowest peak hazard rate of 0.047.

Conclusions: The recurrence peak for CRLM patients occurred approximately 6 months postsurgery, highlighting the need for intensified early postoperative surveillance. Patients with high TBS experienced earlier recurrence, underscoring the importance of close monitoring, particularly during the first 6 months after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信