{"title":"在冠状动脉疾病诊断中,氟匹利达-PET-MPI 与 SPECT-MPI 的美国支付方预算影响分析。","authors":"Stacey Priest, Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Erika Szabo, Arturo Cabra","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2431413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of a novel radiotracer, Flurpiridaz (F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI), compared to SPECT-MPI from a US payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The model was developed comparing F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI and SPECT-MPI, with F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI modality share increasing from 0.5% to 2.5% of the total MPI modality share, over a 5-year time horizon. The model estimates the impact of diagnostic performance on downstream healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) including invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, pharmacological treatment, and cardiac outcomes (CO) such as cardiac mortality (CM) and myocardial infarction (MI). Four suspected CAD populations, including general and difficult-to-image subgroups, were analyzed. Clinical inputs used to support the parameterization of the model were sourced from a systematic literature search and included claims-based real-world evidence, observational, and multicenter registry studies to inform the rates of HCRU and CO, and head-to-head comparative clinical trial data advised diagnostic performance inputs. Reimbursement codes informed MPI modality costs. Results are reported as per-member per-month (PMPM) based on a hypothetical health plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all suspected CAD populations analyzed, there was a nominal cost increase in the world with F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI. The 5-year average PMPM incremental budget impact ranged from $0.02 to $0.05 across all suspected CAD subgroups. Cost-savings were associated with decreased downstream CO such as CM, MI, and ICA.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>The available literature to source all parameters in the model was limited; therefore, assumptions and additional calculations were made based on published evidence to inform the model. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm and address uncertainty in key parameters. This comprehensive analysis illustrates that the superior diagnostic performance of F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI may result in reduced adverse CO events and associated costs, increased appropriate identification and treatment of CAD, and a minimal increase in overall costs among general and difficult-to-image patient subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1542-1551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A US payer budget impact analysis of Flurpiridaz-PET-MPI compared to SPECT-MPI in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.\",\"authors\":\"Stacey Priest, Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Erika Szabo, Arturo Cabra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2024.2431413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of a novel radiotracer, Flurpiridaz (F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI), compared to SPECT-MPI from a US payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The model was developed comparing F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI and SPECT-MPI, with F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI modality share increasing from 0.5% to 2.5% of the total MPI modality share, over a 5-year time horizon. The model estimates the impact of diagnostic performance on downstream healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) including invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, pharmacological treatment, and cardiac outcomes (CO) such as cardiac mortality (CM) and myocardial infarction (MI). Four suspected CAD populations, including general and difficult-to-image subgroups, were analyzed. Clinical inputs used to support the parameterization of the model were sourced from a systematic literature search and included claims-based real-world evidence, observational, and multicenter registry studies to inform the rates of HCRU and CO, and head-to-head comparative clinical trial data advised diagnostic performance inputs. Reimbursement codes informed MPI modality costs. Results are reported as per-member per-month (PMPM) based on a hypothetical health plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all suspected CAD populations analyzed, there was a nominal cost increase in the world with F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI. The 5-year average PMPM incremental budget impact ranged from $0.02 to $0.05 across all suspected CAD subgroups. Cost-savings were associated with decreased downstream CO such as CM, MI, and ICA.</p><p><strong>Limitations and conclusion: </strong>The available literature to source all parameters in the model was limited; therefore, assumptions and additional calculations were made based on published evidence to inform the model. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm and address uncertainty in key parameters. This comprehensive analysis illustrates that the superior diagnostic performance of F<sup>18</sup>-PET-MPI may result in reduced adverse CO events and associated costs, increased appropriate identification and treatment of CAD, and a minimal increase in overall costs among general and difficult-to-image patient subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1542-1551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2431413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2431413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A US payer budget impact analysis of Flurpiridaz-PET-MPI compared to SPECT-MPI in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Aims: This economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of a novel radiotracer, Flurpiridaz (F18-PET-MPI), compared to SPECT-MPI from a US payer perspective.
Materials and methods: The model was developed comparing F18-PET-MPI and SPECT-MPI, with F18-PET-MPI modality share increasing from 0.5% to 2.5% of the total MPI modality share, over a 5-year time horizon. The model estimates the impact of diagnostic performance on downstream healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) including invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, pharmacological treatment, and cardiac outcomes (CO) such as cardiac mortality (CM) and myocardial infarction (MI). Four suspected CAD populations, including general and difficult-to-image subgroups, were analyzed. Clinical inputs used to support the parameterization of the model were sourced from a systematic literature search and included claims-based real-world evidence, observational, and multicenter registry studies to inform the rates of HCRU and CO, and head-to-head comparative clinical trial data advised diagnostic performance inputs. Reimbursement codes informed MPI modality costs. Results are reported as per-member per-month (PMPM) based on a hypothetical health plan.
Results: In all suspected CAD populations analyzed, there was a nominal cost increase in the world with F18-PET-MPI. The 5-year average PMPM incremental budget impact ranged from $0.02 to $0.05 across all suspected CAD subgroups. Cost-savings were associated with decreased downstream CO such as CM, MI, and ICA.
Limitations and conclusion: The available literature to source all parameters in the model was limited; therefore, assumptions and additional calculations were made based on published evidence to inform the model. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm and address uncertainty in key parameters. This comprehensive analysis illustrates that the superior diagnostic performance of F18-PET-MPI may result in reduced adverse CO events and associated costs, increased appropriate identification and treatment of CAD, and a minimal increase in overall costs among general and difficult-to-image patient subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience