经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术与传统开放式椎弓根螺钉固定术治疗无神经功能障碍的胸腰椎骨折的手术效果比较。

Q3 Medicine
Kumar Paudel, Somraj Lamichhane, Rajiv Jha
{"title":"经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术与传统开放式椎弓根螺钉固定术治疗无神经功能障碍的胸腰椎骨折的手术效果比较。","authors":"Kumar Paudel, Somraj Lamichhane, Rajiv Jha","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic thoracolumbar fractures are frequently encountered in blunt trauma patients. The Open pedicle screw fixation has been proven to be effective in stabilizing fractures, deformity correction, early mobilization and improving long term quality of life of patients with thoracolumbar fracture. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a minimally invasive approach that minimizes the tissue injury, enhances early recovery and facilitates rehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the surgical outcomes of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. Single center, Prospective, Comparative study Methods: A total of 34 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with intact neurology were treated with either percutaneous or open pedicle screw fixation between February 1st 2023 to March 1st 2024 at the National trauma center , Kathmandu. There were 17 patients in each group. The perioperative clinical and radiological parameters were collected using a preformed pro forma. Postoperatively follow-up was conducted at post op day 1, during discharge and 3 months. The clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 24(70.6%) males and 10(29.4%) females. The mean age was 40.73 ±15.44 years. There was a statistically significant difference between percutaneous and open pedicle screw with regard to intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, operative duration, deambulation day and overall hospital stay (p<0.05). Overall, there was a statistically significant improvement in overall pain perception at discharge and three month follow up in both groups. The kyphosis correction in percutaneous group was similar to open pedicle screw fixation technique (mean cobbs angle correction of 4.7 degree).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percutaneous approach has several advantages over the open pedicle screw fixation with regard to less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, early deambulation, no was a statistically complications and shorter hospital stay Keywords: Open pedicle screw; percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; thoracolumbar fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 2","pages":"391-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and Traditional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurological Deficit.\",\"authors\":\"Kumar Paudel, Somraj Lamichhane, Rajiv Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic thoracolumbar fractures are frequently encountered in blunt trauma patients. The Open pedicle screw fixation has been proven to be effective in stabilizing fractures, deformity correction, early mobilization and improving long term quality of life of patients with thoracolumbar fracture. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a minimally invasive approach that minimizes the tissue injury, enhances early recovery and facilitates rehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the surgical outcomes of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. Single center, Prospective, Comparative study Methods: A total of 34 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with intact neurology were treated with either percutaneous or open pedicle screw fixation between February 1st 2023 to March 1st 2024 at the National trauma center , Kathmandu. There were 17 patients in each group. The perioperative clinical and radiological parameters were collected using a preformed pro forma. Postoperatively follow-up was conducted at post op day 1, during discharge and 3 months. The clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 24(70.6%) males and 10(29.4%) females. The mean age was 40.73 ±15.44 years. There was a statistically significant difference between percutaneous and open pedicle screw with regard to intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, operative duration, deambulation day and overall hospital stay (p<0.05). Overall, there was a statistically significant improvement in overall pain perception at discharge and three month follow up in both groups. The kyphosis correction in percutaneous group was similar to open pedicle screw fixation technique (mean cobbs angle correction of 4.7 degree).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percutaneous approach has several advantages over the open pedicle screw fixation with regard to less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, early deambulation, no was a statistically complications and shorter hospital stay Keywords: Open pedicle screw; percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; thoracolumbar fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"391-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.5206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤性胸腰椎骨折经常发生在钝性创伤患者身上。经证实,开放式椎弓根螺钉固定在稳定骨折、矫正畸形、早期活动和改善胸腰椎骨折患者的长期生活质量方面非常有效。经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术是一种微创方法,可最大限度地减少对组织的损伤,提高早期恢复能力,促进康复计划:比较经皮与开放式椎弓根螺钉固定治疗无神经功能障碍的胸腰椎骨折的手术效果。单中心、前瞻性、比较研究 方法:2023 年 2 月 1 日至 2024 年 3 月 1 日期间,加德满都国家创伤中心共对 34 名神经功能完好的胸腰椎骨折患者进行了经皮或开放式椎弓根螺钉固定治疗。每组各有 17 名患者。围手术期的临床和放射学参数均采用事先制作好的表格收集。术后随访在术后第 1 天、出院期间和 3 个月内进行。对经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术和开放式椎弓根螺钉固定术的临床和放射学结果进行了分析和比较:本研究包括 24 名男性(70.6%)和 10 名女性(29.4%)。平均年龄为 40.73±15.44 岁。经皮椎弓根螺钉与开放式椎弓根螺钉在术中失血量、透视时间、手术持续时间、行走天数和总住院时间方面的差异有统计学意义(p结论:经皮椎弓根螺钉与开放式椎弓根螺钉在术中失血量、透视时间、手术持续时间、行走天数和总住院时间方面的差异有统计学意义:与开放式椎弓根螺钉固定相比,经皮方法具有术中失血少、术后疼痛轻、可早期下地活动、无统计学并发症和住院时间短等优点:开放式椎弓根螺钉;经皮椎弓根螺钉固定;胸腰椎骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and Traditional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurological Deficit.

Background: Traumatic thoracolumbar fractures are frequently encountered in blunt trauma patients. The Open pedicle screw fixation has been proven to be effective in stabilizing fractures, deformity correction, early mobilization and improving long term quality of life of patients with thoracolumbar fracture. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a minimally invasive approach that minimizes the tissue injury, enhances early recovery and facilitates rehabilitation program.

Objectives: To compare the surgical outcomes of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. Single center, Prospective, Comparative study Methods: A total of 34 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with intact neurology were treated with either percutaneous or open pedicle screw fixation between February 1st 2023 to March 1st 2024 at the National trauma center , Kathmandu. There were 17 patients in each group. The perioperative clinical and radiological parameters were collected using a preformed pro forma. Postoperatively follow-up was conducted at post op day 1, during discharge and 3 months. The clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation were analyzed and compared.

Results: This study included 24(70.6%) males and 10(29.4%) females. The mean age was 40.73 ±15.44 years. There was a statistically significant difference between percutaneous and open pedicle screw with regard to intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, operative duration, deambulation day and overall hospital stay (p<0.05). Overall, there was a statistically significant improvement in overall pain perception at discharge and three month follow up in both groups. The kyphosis correction in percutaneous group was similar to open pedicle screw fixation technique (mean cobbs angle correction of 4.7 degree).

Conclusions: The percutaneous approach has several advantages over the open pedicle screw fixation with regard to less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, early deambulation, no was a statistically complications and shorter hospital stay Keywords: Open pedicle screw; percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; thoracolumbar fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信