比较使用 1%龙胆紫和 1%克霉唑局部治疗耳霉菌病的治愈率。

Q3 Medicine
Srijana Dhakal, Gyanendra Bagale, Ajit Nepal, Deepak Yadav, Chetan Khadka, Deepa Joshi
{"title":"比较使用 1%龙胆紫和 1%克霉唑局部治疗耳霉菌病的治愈率。","authors":"Srijana Dhakal, Gyanendra Bagale, Ajit Nepal, Deepak Yadav, Chetan Khadka, Deepa Joshi","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Otomycosis is a fungal infection of external auditory canal with worldwide prevalence of 9% to 30%. Treatment includes elimination of predisposing factor, thorough canal cleaning and topical or systemic antifungal agents. Clotrimazole is a specific topical antifungal agent with effectiveness varying from 95% to 100%. Gentian violet is an aniline dye and its use as antifungal has been mentioned in literature with effectiveness up to 80%. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of these two commonly used treatments in otomycosis.This is a conducted in Department of ENT-HNS, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal over one-year period after approval from institutional review committee. Patients with otomycosis were randomized into arm A and arm B group. Arm A patients were treated with one percent clotrimazole topical drops. Patients in Arm B were treated with application of one percent Gentian Violet paint. Effectiveness was measured on the basis of clinical response and recovery at end of second week. Data analysis was done with Epi Info application. Chi-square test was used and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 90 patients were treated for otomycosis over one year. Recovery was better in clotrimazole group at second week i.e., 86.84% vs 71.43%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clotrimazole was more effective in treatment of otomycosis compared to Gentian Violet paint, though the result was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 2","pages":"269-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Srijana Dhakal, Gyanendra Bagale, Ajit Nepal, Deepak Yadav, Chetan Khadka, Deepa Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Otomycosis is a fungal infection of external auditory canal with worldwide prevalence of 9% to 30%. Treatment includes elimination of predisposing factor, thorough canal cleaning and topical or systemic antifungal agents. Clotrimazole is a specific topical antifungal agent with effectiveness varying from 95% to 100%. Gentian violet is an aniline dye and its use as antifungal has been mentioned in literature with effectiveness up to 80%. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of these two commonly used treatments in otomycosis.This is a conducted in Department of ENT-HNS, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal over one-year period after approval from institutional review committee. Patients with otomycosis were randomized into arm A and arm B group. Arm A patients were treated with one percent clotrimazole topical drops. Patients in Arm B were treated with application of one percent Gentian Violet paint. Effectiveness was measured on the basis of clinical response and recovery at end of second week. Data analysis was done with Epi Info application. Chi-square test was used and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 90 patients were treated for otomycosis over one year. Recovery was better in clotrimazole group at second week i.e., 86.84% vs 71.43%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clotrimazole was more effective in treatment of otomycosis compared to Gentian Violet paint, though the result was not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"269-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耳霉菌病是一种外耳道真菌感染,全球发病率为 9% 至 30%。治疗方法包括消除致病因素、彻底清洁外耳道、局部或全身使用抗真菌药物。克霉唑是一种特殊的局部抗真菌剂,有效率在 95% 到 100% 之间。龙胆紫是一种苯胺染料,文献中提到其抗真菌效果可达 80%。本研究旨在比较这两种常用治疗方法对耳霉菌病的疗效。本研究在尼泊尔拉利德布尔帕坦健康科学学院耳鼻喉-HNS系进行,经机构审查委员会批准,为期一年。耳霉菌病患者被随机分为 A 组和 B 组。A 组患者接受 1% 的克霉唑局部滴剂治疗。B 组患者使用 1% 龙胆紫涂料。疗效根据临床反应和第二周末的恢复情况来衡量。数据分析采用 Epi Info 软件进行。采用卡方检验,P 值小于 0.05 为显著:结果:一年来,共有 90 名患者接受了耳霉菌病治疗。克霉唑组在第二周的恢复情况更好,即 86.84% 对 71.43%:与龙胆紫涂料相比,克霉唑治疗耳霉菌病的效果更好,但结果没有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.

Background: Otomycosis is a fungal infection of external auditory canal with worldwide prevalence of 9% to 30%. Treatment includes elimination of predisposing factor, thorough canal cleaning and topical or systemic antifungal agents. Clotrimazole is a specific topical antifungal agent with effectiveness varying from 95% to 100%. Gentian violet is an aniline dye and its use as antifungal has been mentioned in literature with effectiveness up to 80%. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of these two commonly used treatments in otomycosis.This is a conducted in Department of ENT-HNS, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal over one-year period after approval from institutional review committee. Patients with otomycosis were randomized into arm A and arm B group. Arm A patients were treated with one percent clotrimazole topical drops. Patients in Arm B were treated with application of one percent Gentian Violet paint. Effectiveness was measured on the basis of clinical response and recovery at end of second week. Data analysis was done with Epi Info application. Chi-square test was used and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Total 90 patients were treated for otomycosis over one year. Recovery was better in clotrimazole group at second week i.e., 86.84% vs 71.43%.

Conclusions: Clotrimazole was more effective in treatment of otomycosis compared to Gentian Violet paint, though the result was not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信