Sumaiah J Alarfaj, Mostafa M Bahaa, Thanaa A Elmasry, Eman I Elberri, Eman El-Khateeb, Amir O Hamouda, Muhammed M Salahuddin, Marwa Kamal, Abdel-Naser Abdel-Atty Gadallah, Nashwa Eltantawy, Mohamed Yasser, Walaa A Negm, Manal A Hamouda, Amsha S Alsegiani, Sarah Alrubia, Mamdouh Eldesoqui, Mahmoud S Abdallah
{"title":"非诺贝特作为溃疡性结肠炎的辅助疗法:通过 SIRT1、NLRP3 和 AMPK 通路靶向炎症:一项随机对照试验研究。","authors":"Sumaiah J Alarfaj, Mostafa M Bahaa, Thanaa A Elmasry, Eman I Elberri, Eman El-Khateeb, Amir O Hamouda, Muhammed M Salahuddin, Marwa Kamal, Abdel-Naser Abdel-Atty Gadallah, Nashwa Eltantawy, Mohamed Yasser, Walaa A Negm, Manal A Hamouda, Amsha S Alsegiani, Sarah Alrubia, Mamdouh Eldesoqui, Mahmoud S Abdallah","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S490772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronic inflammation of colonic and rectal mucosa. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has been identified as having protective effects in UC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, in UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients with mild to moderate UC were allocated randomly and assigned to two groups (n = 35 each) from Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. The mesalamine group received a placebo along with 1 g of mesalamine three times daily, while the fenofibrate group received 1 g of mesalamine three times and fenofibrate 160 mg once daily. The study duration was for six months. A gastroenterologist assessed patients by non-invasive Partial Mayo Score (PMS) and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) to evaluate clinical response and remission. The serum levels of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as fecal calprotectin levels were examined to determine the biological effect of fenofibrate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the fenofibrate group showed statistically significant reductions in PMS (<i>p =</i> 0.044) and improved digestive domain of IBDQ (<i>p =</i> 0.023). Additionally, there were significant decreases in serum NLRP3 (<i>p =</i> 0.041) and fecal calprotectin (<i>p =</i> 0.035), along with significant increases in SIRT1 (<i>p =</i> 0.002) and AMPK (<i>p =</i> 0.0003). The fenofibrate group also had higher response and remission rates compared to the mesalamine group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fenofibrate may be a promising adjunct for improving clinical outcomes, quality of life, and modulating inflammation in mild to moderate patients with UC.</p><p><strong>Trial registration identifier: </strong>NCT05781698.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"5239-5253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fenofibrate as an Adjunct Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: Targeting Inflammation via SIRT1, NLRP3, and AMPK Pathways: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sumaiah J Alarfaj, Mostafa M Bahaa, Thanaa A Elmasry, Eman I Elberri, Eman El-Khateeb, Amir O Hamouda, Muhammed M Salahuddin, Marwa Kamal, Abdel-Naser Abdel-Atty Gadallah, Nashwa Eltantawy, Mohamed Yasser, Walaa A Negm, Manal A Hamouda, Amsha S Alsegiani, Sarah Alrubia, Mamdouh Eldesoqui, Mahmoud S Abdallah\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S490772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronic inflammation of colonic and rectal mucosa. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has been identified as having protective effects in UC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, in UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 patients with mild to moderate UC were allocated randomly and assigned to two groups (n = 35 each) from Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. The mesalamine group received a placebo along with 1 g of mesalamine three times daily, while the fenofibrate group received 1 g of mesalamine three times and fenofibrate 160 mg once daily. The study duration was for six months. A gastroenterologist assessed patients by non-invasive Partial Mayo Score (PMS) and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) to evaluate clinical response and remission. The serum levels of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as fecal calprotectin levels were examined to determine the biological effect of fenofibrate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the fenofibrate group showed statistically significant reductions in PMS (<i>p =</i> 0.044) and improved digestive domain of IBDQ (<i>p =</i> 0.023). Additionally, there were significant decreases in serum NLRP3 (<i>p =</i> 0.041) and fecal calprotectin (<i>p =</i> 0.035), along with significant increases in SIRT1 (<i>p =</i> 0.002) and AMPK (<i>p =</i> 0.0003). The fenofibrate group also had higher response and remission rates compared to the mesalamine group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fenofibrate may be a promising adjunct for improving clinical outcomes, quality of life, and modulating inflammation in mild to moderate patients with UC.</p><p><strong>Trial registration identifier: </strong>NCT05781698.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5239-5253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S490772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S490772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fenofibrate as an Adjunct Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: Targeting Inflammation via SIRT1, NLRP3, and AMPK Pathways: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronic inflammation of colonic and rectal mucosa. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has been identified as having protective effects in UC.
Aim: The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, in UC.
Methods: A total of 70 patients with mild to moderate UC were allocated randomly and assigned to two groups (n = 35 each) from Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. The mesalamine group received a placebo along with 1 g of mesalamine three times daily, while the fenofibrate group received 1 g of mesalamine three times and fenofibrate 160 mg once daily. The study duration was for six months. A gastroenterologist assessed patients by non-invasive Partial Mayo Score (PMS) and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) to evaluate clinical response and remission. The serum levels of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as fecal calprotectin levels were examined to determine the biological effect of fenofibrate.
Results: After treatment, the fenofibrate group showed statistically significant reductions in PMS (p = 0.044) and improved digestive domain of IBDQ (p = 0.023). Additionally, there were significant decreases in serum NLRP3 (p = 0.041) and fecal calprotectin (p = 0.035), along with significant increases in SIRT1 (p = 0.002) and AMPK (p = 0.0003). The fenofibrate group also had higher response and remission rates compared to the mesalamine group.
Conclusion: Fenofibrate may be a promising adjunct for improving clinical outcomes, quality of life, and modulating inflammation in mild to moderate patients with UC.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.