中风后站立平衡和行走能力障碍与皮质脊髓束和非皮质脊髓束的完整性有关吗?一项荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-02-23 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2422382
Amber van Hinsberg, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Jonas Schröder, Steven Truijen, Wim Saeys, Laetitia Yperzeele
{"title":"中风后站立平衡和行走能力障碍与皮质脊髓束和非皮质脊髓束的完整性有关吗?一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Amber van Hinsberg, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Jonas Schröder, Steven Truijen, Wim Saeys, Laetitia Yperzeele","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2422382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in upper limb recovery poststroke is well established, but its association with standing balance and walking remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the relationship between CST and non-CST motor tract integrity, and clinical scores of standing balance and walking poststroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In July 2024, five databases were searched for studies, focusing on diffusion MRI metrics and clinical scores of standing balance and/or walking independence poststroke. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool correlation coefficients (r) and group differences (d) based on CST integrity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were included. Cross-sectional analysis showed no correlation (<i>r</i> < .25) between CST metrics and the functional ambulation category (FAC) in the sub-acute phase. Weak prognostic associations were found for CST-FA and CST-FN with FAC. Significant FAC score differences were found between preserved- and disrupted CST groups in the sub-acute (d = .79) and chronic (d = 1.07) phase and for prognostic analysis (d = 1.40). Non-CST metrics showed no cross-sectional associations and mixed prognostic associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CST integrity was not significantly associated with standing balance or walking independence in the sub-acute phase. Early CST integrity showed weak prognostic value for walking at 6 months. Multimodal longitudinal research is needed to improve lower limb recovery prognostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"163-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are standing balance and walking ability deficits poststroke related to the integrity of the corticospinal and non-corticospinal tracts? A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amber van Hinsberg, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Jonas Schröder, Steven Truijen, Wim Saeys, Laetitia Yperzeele\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2024.2422382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in upper limb recovery poststroke is well established, but its association with standing balance and walking remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the relationship between CST and non-CST motor tract integrity, and clinical scores of standing balance and walking poststroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In July 2024, five databases were searched for studies, focusing on diffusion MRI metrics and clinical scores of standing balance and/or walking independence poststroke. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool correlation coefficients (r) and group differences (d) based on CST integrity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies were included. Cross-sectional analysis showed no correlation (<i>r</i> < .25) between CST metrics and the functional ambulation category (FAC) in the sub-acute phase. Weak prognostic associations were found for CST-FA and CST-FN with FAC. Significant FAC score differences were found between preserved- and disrupted CST groups in the sub-acute (d = .79) and chronic (d = 1.07) phase and for prognostic analysis (d = 1.40). Non-CST metrics showed no cross-sectional associations and mixed prognostic associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CST integrity was not significantly associated with standing balance or walking independence in the sub-acute phase. Early CST integrity showed weak prognostic value for walking at 6 months. Multimodal longitudinal research is needed to improve lower limb recovery prognostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"163-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2422382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2422382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮质脊髓束(CST)的完整性对脑卒中后上肢恢复的重要性已得到公认,但其与站立平衡和行走的关系仍不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在确定 CST 和非 CST 运动束完整性与脑卒中后站立平衡和行走的临床评分之间的关系:方法:2024 年 7 月,我们在五个数据库中搜索了相关研究,重点关注弥散磁共振成像指标和卒中后站立平衡和/或行走独立性的临床评分。根据 CST 的完整性,对相关系数(r)和组间差异(d)进行了元分析:结果:共纳入 22 项研究。横断面分析表明没有相关性(r 结论:CST 的完整性与站立行走没有显著相关性:在亚急性阶段,CST完整性与站立平衡或独立行走无明显关联。早期 CST 的完整性对 6 个月后的行走预后价值较弱。需要进行多模式纵向研究,以改善下肢恢复预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are standing balance and walking ability deficits poststroke related to the integrity of the corticospinal and non-corticospinal tracts? A meta-analysis.

Background: The importance of corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in upper limb recovery poststroke is well established, but its association with standing balance and walking remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the relationship between CST and non-CST motor tract integrity, and clinical scores of standing balance and walking poststroke.

Methods: In July 2024, five databases were searched for studies, focusing on diffusion MRI metrics and clinical scores of standing balance and/or walking independence poststroke. Meta-analyses were conducted to pool correlation coefficients (r) and group differences (d) based on CST integrity.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included. Cross-sectional analysis showed no correlation (r < .25) between CST metrics and the functional ambulation category (FAC) in the sub-acute phase. Weak prognostic associations were found for CST-FA and CST-FN with FAC. Significant FAC score differences were found between preserved- and disrupted CST groups in the sub-acute (d = .79) and chronic (d = 1.07) phase and for prognostic analysis (d = 1.40). Non-CST metrics showed no cross-sectional associations and mixed prognostic associations.

Conclusions: CST integrity was not significantly associated with standing balance or walking independence in the sub-acute phase. Early CST integrity showed weak prognostic value for walking at 6 months. Multimodal longitudinal research is needed to improve lower limb recovery prognostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信