Robert Klamroth, Nana Kragh, Alix Arnaud, Patricia Guyot, Amanda Wilson, Piotr Wojciechowski, Marlena Wdowiak, Wojciech Margas, Linda Bystrická, Alberto Tosetto
{"title":"Efanesoctocog Alfa 与标准和延长半衰期因子 VIII 对无抑制剂的青少年和成年 A 型血友病患者的预防治疗对比。","authors":"Robert Klamroth, Nana Kragh, Alix Arnaud, Patricia Guyot, Amanda Wilson, Piotr Wojciechowski, Marlena Wdowiak, Wojciech Margas, Linda Bystrická, Alberto Tosetto","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Phase 3 XTEND-1 trial, (NCT04161495) efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection versus pre-study factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and standard/extended half-life (SHL and EHL) FVIII replacement therapies in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted to identify Phase 3 trials of EHL and SHL FVIII replacement therapies for comparison with efanesoctocog alfa data from XTEND-1. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds between efanesoctocog alfa and comparators. The estimates from respective comparisons were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the overall difference between efanesoctocog alfa and comparator therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four EHL therapies (rurioctocog alfa pegol, efmoroctocog alfa, turoctocog alfa pegol, damoctocog alfa pegol) and two octocog alfa SHL therapies were included. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any [mean difference (95% CI) - 2.24 ( - 3.24; - 1.25)], spontaneous [ - 1.52 ( - 2.33; - 0.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 1.60 ( - 2.32; - 0.88)] versus EHL therapies, and with significantly lower ABRs for any [ - 3.61 ( - 4.43; - 2.79)], treated [ - 1.55 ( - 1.89; - 1.20)], spontaneous [ - 2.52 ( - 3.31; - 1.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 3.42 ( - 4.77; - 2.08)] versus SHL therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs (any, spontaneous and joint) compared with EHL or SHL prophylaxis therapies. Patients had, on average, 2.2 and 3.6 fewer bleeds per year versus EHL and SHL therapies, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Klamroth, Nana Kragh, Alix Arnaud, Patricia Guyot, Amanda Wilson, Piotr Wojciechowski, Marlena Wdowiak, Wojciech Margas, Linda Bystrická, Alberto Tosetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Phase 3 XTEND-1 trial, (NCT04161495) efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection versus pre-study factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and standard/extended half-life (SHL and EHL) FVIII replacement therapies in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted to identify Phase 3 trials of EHL and SHL FVIII replacement therapies for comparison with efanesoctocog alfa data from XTEND-1. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds between efanesoctocog alfa and comparators. The estimates from respective comparisons were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the overall difference between efanesoctocog alfa and comparator therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four EHL therapies (rurioctocog alfa pegol, efmoroctocog alfa, turoctocog alfa pegol, damoctocog alfa pegol) and two octocog alfa SHL therapies were included. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any [mean difference (95% CI) - 2.24 ( - 3.24; - 1.25)], spontaneous [ - 1.52 ( - 2.33; - 0.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 1.60 ( - 2.32; - 0.88)] versus EHL therapies, and with significantly lower ABRs for any [ - 3.61 ( - 4.43; - 2.79)], treated [ - 1.55 ( - 1.89; - 1.20)], spontaneous [ - 2.52 ( - 3.31; - 1.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 3.42 ( - 4.77; - 2.08)] versus SHL therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs (any, spontaneous and joint) compared with EHL or SHL prophylaxis therapies. Patients had, on average, 2.2 and 3.6 fewer bleeds per year versus EHL and SHL therapies, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.
Introduction: In the Phase 3 XTEND-1 trial, (NCT04161495) efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection versus pre-study factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and standard/extended half-life (SHL and EHL) FVIII replacement therapies in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify Phase 3 trials of EHL and SHL FVIII replacement therapies for comparison with efanesoctocog alfa data from XTEND-1. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds between efanesoctocog alfa and comparators. The estimates from respective comparisons were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the overall difference between efanesoctocog alfa and comparator therapies.
Results: Four EHL therapies (rurioctocog alfa pegol, efmoroctocog alfa, turoctocog alfa pegol, damoctocog alfa pegol) and two octocog alfa SHL therapies were included. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any [mean difference (95% CI) - 2.24 ( - 3.24; - 1.25)], spontaneous [ - 1.52 ( - 2.33; - 0.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 1.60 ( - 2.32; - 0.88)] versus EHL therapies, and with significantly lower ABRs for any [ - 3.61 ( - 4.43; - 2.79)], treated [ - 1.55 ( - 1.89; - 1.20)], spontaneous [ - 2.52 ( - 3.31; - 1.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 3.42 ( - 4.77; - 2.08)] versus SHL therapies.
Conclusion: Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs (any, spontaneous and joint) compared with EHL or SHL prophylaxis therapies. Patients had, on average, 2.2 and 3.6 fewer bleeds per year versus EHL and SHL therapies, respectively.
期刊介绍：
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
