Laura Kudlek, Patricia Eustachio Colombo, Amy Ahern, Struan Tait, Natasha Reid, Milindu Wickramarachchi, Aiswarya Lakshmi, Stephen J Sharp, Marie Spreckley, Julia Mueller, Rebecca A Jones
{"title":"行为体重管理干预对超重或肥胖成人饮食行为特征的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Laura Kudlek, Patricia Eustachio Colombo, Amy Ahern, Struan Tait, Natasha Reid, Milindu Wickramarachchi, Aiswarya Lakshmi, Stephen J Sharp, Marie Spreckley, Julia Mueller, Rebecca A Jones","doi":"10.1111/obr.13871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eating behavior traits (EBTs), defined as personal tendencies determining food intake, can be useful targets for behavioral weight management interventions. Previous reviews have examined the impact of specific intervention types on EBTs, not reflecting the breadth of interventions used in practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on the impact of all types of behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. We searched seven databases and included randomized controlled trials reporting EBT outcomes following behavioral weight management interventions delivered to adults with overweight or obesity. Using random-effects meta-analyses, we synthesized findings from 27 trials at the end of intervention and 12 months (±3 months) post intervention. We found evidence to suggest that interventions improved uncontrolled eating, external eating, susceptibility to hunger, restraint and intuitive eating at intervention end when compared with waitlist, minimal or usual care control. We found no evidence of effects on emotional eating, disinhibition, and hedonic hunger. At follow-up, effects on restraint remained, but we found no evidence of an effect on emotional eating, hedonic hunger and uncontrolled eating. Findings were limited by low numbers of contributing trials. More high-quality trials reporting EBTs are needed to better understand the impact of adult behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022367505.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13871"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of behavioral weight management interventions on eating behavior traits in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Kudlek, Patricia Eustachio Colombo, Amy Ahern, Struan Tait, Natasha Reid, Milindu Wickramarachchi, Aiswarya Lakshmi, Stephen J Sharp, Marie Spreckley, Julia Mueller, Rebecca A Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eating behavior traits (EBTs), defined as personal tendencies determining food intake, can be useful targets for behavioral weight management interventions. Previous reviews have examined the impact of specific intervention types on EBTs, not reflecting the breadth of interventions used in practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on the impact of all types of behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. We searched seven databases and included randomized controlled trials reporting EBT outcomes following behavioral weight management interventions delivered to adults with overweight or obesity. Using random-effects meta-analyses, we synthesized findings from 27 trials at the end of intervention and 12 months (±3 months) post intervention. We found evidence to suggest that interventions improved uncontrolled eating, external eating, susceptibility to hunger, restraint and intuitive eating at intervention end when compared with waitlist, minimal or usual care control. We found no evidence of effects on emotional eating, disinhibition, and hedonic hunger. At follow-up, effects on restraint remained, but we found no evidence of an effect on emotional eating, hedonic hunger and uncontrolled eating. Findings were limited by low numbers of contributing trials. More high-quality trials reporting EBTs are needed to better understand the impact of adult behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022367505.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13871\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of behavioral weight management interventions on eating behavior traits in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eating behavior traits (EBTs), defined as personal tendencies determining food intake, can be useful targets for behavioral weight management interventions. Previous reviews have examined the impact of specific intervention types on EBTs, not reflecting the breadth of interventions used in practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on the impact of all types of behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. We searched seven databases and included randomized controlled trials reporting EBT outcomes following behavioral weight management interventions delivered to adults with overweight or obesity. Using random-effects meta-analyses, we synthesized findings from 27 trials at the end of intervention and 12 months (±3 months) post intervention. We found evidence to suggest that interventions improved uncontrolled eating, external eating, susceptibility to hunger, restraint and intuitive eating at intervention end when compared with waitlist, minimal or usual care control. We found no evidence of effects on emotional eating, disinhibition, and hedonic hunger. At follow-up, effects on restraint remained, but we found no evidence of an effect on emotional eating, hedonic hunger and uncontrolled eating. Findings were limited by low numbers of contributing trials. More high-quality trials reporting EBTs are needed to better understand the impact of adult behavioral weight management interventions on EBTs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022367505.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.