不同水处理条件下华北玉米田土壤呼吸量的日变化和季节变化

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4985
Mengfei Zhang, Wenting Han, Chaoqun Li, Liyuan Zhang, Manman Peng, Tonghua Wang, Xiangwei Chen
{"title":"不同水处理条件下华北玉米田土壤呼吸量的日变化和季节变化","authors":"Mengfei Zhang,&nbsp;Wenting Han,&nbsp;Chaoqun Li,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Manman Peng,&nbsp;Tonghua Wang,&nbsp;Xiangwei Chen","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (R<sub>S</sub>), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate R<sub>S</sub> from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily R<sub>S</sub> were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (<i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub>) and soil surface temperature (<i>T</i><sub>SF</sub>), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. <i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>SF</sub> also performed similar correlation with seasonal R<sub>S</sub> with <i>R</i> greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with <i>R</i> greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of R<sub>S</sub> at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> and 91.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily R<sub>S</sub> and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate R<sub>S</sub> at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China\",\"authors\":\"Mengfei Zhang,&nbsp;Wenting Han,&nbsp;Chaoqun Li,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Manman Peng,&nbsp;Tonghua Wang,&nbsp;Xiangwei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (R<sub>S</sub>), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate R<sub>S</sub> from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily R<sub>S</sub> were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (<i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub>) and soil surface temperature (<i>T</i><sub>SF</sub>), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. <i>T</i><sub>S,5</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>SF</sub> also performed similar correlation with seasonal R<sub>S</sub> with <i>R</i> greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with <i>R</i> greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of R<sub>S</sub> at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup> and 91.5 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily R<sub>S</sub> and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal R<sub>S</sub>, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate R<sub>S</sub> at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为进一步评估水分胁迫对土壤呼吸作用(RS)的影响,揭示RS日变化和季节变化的影响因素,系统评价和比较不同机器学习算法(多元非线性回归[MNR]、支持向量机回归[SVR]、反向传播人工神经网络[BPNN])对水分胁迫条件下玉米田RS估算的敏感性,在中国内蒙古某玉米田进行了2019年整个生长期的田间试验。在无性期、生育期和成熟期进行了不同程度的亏缺灌溉。我们的研究表明,在夏玉米的各个生长阶段,100%蒸腾处理(Tr1)的土壤二氧化碳通量显著高于各种亏缺灌溉处理(Tr2、Tr3、Tr4)。与 Tr1 相比,Tr2、Tr3 和 Tr4 的累积土壤二氧化碳通量分别减少了 24.8%、30.3% 和 43.7%。我们确定,影响日 RS 的驱动因素是 5 厘米深度的土壤温度(TS,5)和土壤表面温度(TSF),其次是 5 厘米深度的充水孔隙度(WFPS),但在 25 厘米深度未观察到显著的相关性。在所有水处理中,TS,5 和 TSF 与季节 RS 的相关性相似,R 大于 0.753,其次是叶绿素含量,R 大于 0.726。在整个生长季中,BPNN 模型的预测效果最好,可解释日尺度和季节尺度 RS 变化的 60%-80%和 87.8%,均方根误差分别为 48.7-100.9 mg m-2 h-1 和 91.5 mg m-2 h-1。SVR 和 MNR 模型可估算的日 RS 值分别为 47.9%-57% 和 39.9%-52.1% ,季节 RS 值分别为 81.4% 和 78.6%。总之,我们的研究表明,机器学习算法可成功地用于估算水分胁迫条件下玉米田的日尺度和季节尺度 RS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China

Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China

To further evaluate the effect of water stress on soil respiration (RS), reveal the influencing factors of daily and seasonal RS, and systematically evaluate and compare the sensibility of different machine learning algorithms (multiple nonlinear regression [MNR], support vector machine regression [SVR], backpropagation artificial neural network [BPNN]) to estimate RS from a maize field under water stress condition, the field experiments were conducted within a maize field in Inner Mongolia, China, during the entire 2019 growing season. Various levels of deficit irrigation were conducted in the vegetative, reproductive, and mature stages. Our research indicated that soil CO2 fluxes from 100% evapotranspiration treatment (Tr1) were significantly greater than various deficit irrigation treatments (Tr2, Tr3, Tr4) during each growth stage of summer maize. The cumulative soil CO2 fluxes of Tr2, Tr3, and Tr4 decreased 24.8%, 30.3%, and 43.7% compared with Tr1, respectively. We determined that the drivers affecting the daily RS were soil temperature at 5 cm depth (TS,5) and soil surface temperature (TSF), followed by water-filled porosity (WFPS) at 5 cm depth, but no significant correlations were observed at 25 cm depths. TS,5 and TSF also performed similar correlation with seasonal RS with R greater than 0.753 among all water treatments, followed by chlorophyll content with R greater than 0.726. During the whole growing season, the BPNN model exhibited the best predicting result, and could explain the 60%–80% and 87.8% of the variations of RS at the daily and seasonal scales, with root mean square error of 48.7–100.9 mg m−2 h−1 and 91.5 mg m−2 h−1, respectively. The SVR and MNR models could estimate the 47.9%–57% and 39.9%–52.1% of the daily RS and 81.4% and 78.6% of the seasonal RS, respectively. Overall, our study indicated the machine learning algorithms could be successfully applied to estimate RS at daily and seasonal scales from a maize field under water stress condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信