{"title":"在常规实践中采用新诊断技术时的主要考虑因素。","authors":"Jochen Lennerz","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of pathology is evolving with the integration of advanced and artificial-intelligence-powered diagnostic technologies. However, there remains a significant gap in clearly outlining the key considerations for the effective implementation of these innovations into clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review was to identify and address the essential aspects required to bridge the implementation gap of new diagnostic technologies in pathology.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This review synthesizes key elements from relevant scientific journals, organizational websites, and practical examples from pathology practice. The findings are presented as a structured framework of six key elements, supported by an infographic and illustrative cases from clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key elements are: (1) Innovation depends more on the people driving it than on the work it demands, highlighting the importance of team collaboration and communication; (2) in-depth knowledge of the delivery system emphasizing the importance of care, IT, and administrative layers is crucial; (3) data-driven decision-making in healthcare transformation is central, with an emphasis on the process of converting real-world data (RWD) into actionable real-world evidence (RWE); (4) a proven approach for practice transformation uses a structured (utilization management strategy, UMS) framework; (5) a balanced approach toward financial sustainability, including local and systemic financial strategies, is important; and (6) ensuring safe and effective progress requires a new, collaborative definition of regulatory science, aligning innovation with regulatory oversight to support technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These key aspects offer a foundational framework for integrating new technologies into healthcare. Although not exhaustive, overlooking them would miss a significant opportunity to enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key considerations when implementing new diagnostic technologies in routine practice.\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Lennerz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of pathology is evolving with the integration of advanced and artificial-intelligence-powered diagnostic technologies. However, there remains a significant gap in clearly outlining the key considerations for the effective implementation of these innovations into clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review was to identify and address the essential aspects required to bridge the implementation gap of new diagnostic technologies in pathology.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This review synthesizes key elements from relevant scientific journals, organizational websites, and practical examples from pathology practice. The findings are presented as a structured framework of six key elements, supported by an infographic and illustrative cases from clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key elements are: (1) Innovation depends more on the people driving it than on the work it demands, highlighting the importance of team collaboration and communication; (2) in-depth knowledge of the delivery system emphasizing the importance of care, IT, and administrative layers is crucial; (3) data-driven decision-making in healthcare transformation is central, with an emphasis on the process of converting real-world data (RWD) into actionable real-world evidence (RWE); (4) a proven approach for practice transformation uses a structured (utilization management strategy, UMS) framework; (5) a balanced approach toward financial sustainability, including local and systemic financial strategies, is important; and (6) ensuring safe and effective progress requires a new, collaborative definition of regulatory science, aligning innovation with regulatory oversight to support technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These key aspects offer a foundational framework for integrating new technologies into healthcare. Although not exhaustive, overlooking them would miss a significant opportunity to enhance patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Key considerations when implementing new diagnostic technologies in routine practice.
Background: The field of pathology is evolving with the integration of advanced and artificial-intelligence-powered diagnostic technologies. However, there remains a significant gap in clearly outlining the key considerations for the effective implementation of these innovations into clinical care.
Objectives: The aim of this review was to identify and address the essential aspects required to bridge the implementation gap of new diagnostic technologies in pathology.
Material and methods: This review synthesizes key elements from relevant scientific journals, organizational websites, and practical examples from pathology practice. The findings are presented as a structured framework of six key elements, supported by an infographic and illustrative cases from clinical settings.
Results: The key elements are: (1) Innovation depends more on the people driving it than on the work it demands, highlighting the importance of team collaboration and communication; (2) in-depth knowledge of the delivery system emphasizing the importance of care, IT, and administrative layers is crucial; (3) data-driven decision-making in healthcare transformation is central, with an emphasis on the process of converting real-world data (RWD) into actionable real-world evidence (RWE); (4) a proven approach for practice transformation uses a structured (utilization management strategy, UMS) framework; (5) a balanced approach toward financial sustainability, including local and systemic financial strategies, is important; and (6) ensuring safe and effective progress requires a new, collaborative definition of regulatory science, aligning innovation with regulatory oversight to support technological advancements.
Conclusion: These key aspects offer a foundational framework for integrating new technologies into healthcare. Although not exhaustive, overlooking them would miss a significant opportunity to enhance patient care.