James Lynch, Ethan Wold, Jeff Gau, Simon Sponberg, Nick Gravish
{"title":"弹簧翼系统的稳定性和灵活性权衡。","authors":"James Lynch, Ethan Wold, Jeff Gau, Simon Sponberg, Nick Gravish","doi":"10.1088/1748-3190/ad9535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flying insects are thought to achieve energy-efficient flapping flight by storing and releasing elastic energy in their muscles, tendons, and thorax. However, \"spring-wing\" flight systems consisting of elastic elements coupled to nonlinear, unsteady aerodynamic forces also present possible challenges to generating stable and responsive wing motions. The energetic efficiency from resonance in insect flight is measured by the Weis-Fogh number (N), which is the ratio of peak inertial force to aerodynamic force. In this paper, we present experiments and modeling to study how resonance efficiency (which increases with N) influences the control responsiveness and perturbation resistance of flapping wingbeats. In our first experiments, we provide a step change in the input forcing amplitude to a series-elastic spring-wing system and observe the response time of the wing amplitude increase. In our second experiments we provide an external fluid flow directed at the flapping wing and study the perturbed steady-state wing motion. We evaluate both experiments across Weis-Fogh numbers from 1 < N < 10. The results indicate that spring-wing systems designed for maximum energetic efficiency also experience trade-offs in agility and stability as the Weis-Fogh number increases. Our results demonstrate that energetic efficiency and wing maneuverability are in conflict in resonant spring-wing systems suggesting that mechanical resonance presents tradeoffs in insect flight control and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55377,"journal":{"name":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability and agility trade-offs in spring-wing systems.\",\"authors\":\"James Lynch, Ethan Wold, Jeff Gau, Simon Sponberg, Nick Gravish\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1748-3190/ad9535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Flying insects are thought to achieve energy-efficient flapping flight by storing and releasing elastic energy in their muscles, tendons, and thorax. However, \\\"spring-wing\\\" flight systems consisting of elastic elements coupled to nonlinear, unsteady aerodynamic forces also present possible challenges to generating stable and responsive wing motions. The energetic efficiency from resonance in insect flight is measured by the Weis-Fogh number (N), which is the ratio of peak inertial force to aerodynamic force. In this paper, we present experiments and modeling to study how resonance efficiency (which increases with N) influences the control responsiveness and perturbation resistance of flapping wingbeats. In our first experiments, we provide a step change in the input forcing amplitude to a series-elastic spring-wing system and observe the response time of the wing amplitude increase. In our second experiments we provide an external fluid flow directed at the flapping wing and study the perturbed steady-state wing motion. We evaluate both experiments across Weis-Fogh numbers from 1 < N < 10. The results indicate that spring-wing systems designed for maximum energetic efficiency also experience trade-offs in agility and stability as the Weis-Fogh number increases. Our results demonstrate that energetic efficiency and wing maneuverability are in conflict in resonant spring-wing systems suggesting that mechanical resonance presents tradeoffs in insect flight control and stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad9535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad9535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
飞行昆虫被认为是通过在肌肉、肌腱和胸部储存和释放弹性能量来实现高能效的拍打飞行的。然而,由弹性元件与非线性、不稳定空气动力耦合组成的 "弹簧翼 "飞行系统在产生稳定、灵敏的翅膀运动方面也可能面临挑战。昆虫飞行中共振产生的能量效率用魏斯-福格数(N)来衡量,即惯性力峰值与空气动力之比。在本文中,我们通过实验和建模来研究共振效率(随 N 值增加)如何影响拍打翅膀的控制响应性和抗干扰性。在第一项实验中,我们对串联弹性弹翼系统的输入强迫振幅进行了阶跃变化,并观察了翼振幅增加的响应时间。在第二个实验中,我们向拍打翼提供外部流体流,并研究扰动稳态翼运动。我们对魏斯-福格数从 1 < N < 10 的两个实验进行了评估。结果表明,随着 Weis-Fogh 数的增加,为实现最大能量效率而设计的弹簧翼系统在灵活性和稳定性方面也会出现折衷。我们的研究结果表明,在共振弹簧翼系统中,能量效率和翼的机动性是相互冲突的,这表明机械共振会对昆虫的飞行控制和稳定性产生影响。
Stability and agility trade-offs in spring-wing systems.
Flying insects are thought to achieve energy-efficient flapping flight by storing and releasing elastic energy in their muscles, tendons, and thorax. However, "spring-wing" flight systems consisting of elastic elements coupled to nonlinear, unsteady aerodynamic forces also present possible challenges to generating stable and responsive wing motions. The energetic efficiency from resonance in insect flight is measured by the Weis-Fogh number (N), which is the ratio of peak inertial force to aerodynamic force. In this paper, we present experiments and modeling to study how resonance efficiency (which increases with N) influences the control responsiveness and perturbation resistance of flapping wingbeats. In our first experiments, we provide a step change in the input forcing amplitude to a series-elastic spring-wing system and observe the response time of the wing amplitude increase. In our second experiments we provide an external fluid flow directed at the flapping wing and study the perturbed steady-state wing motion. We evaluate both experiments across Weis-Fogh numbers from 1 < N < 10. The results indicate that spring-wing systems designed for maximum energetic efficiency also experience trade-offs in agility and stability as the Weis-Fogh number increases. Our results demonstrate that energetic efficiency and wing maneuverability are in conflict in resonant spring-wing systems suggesting that mechanical resonance presents tradeoffs in insect flight control and stability.
期刊介绍:
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics publishes research involving the study and distillation of principles and functions found in biological systems that have been developed through evolution, and application of this knowledge to produce novel and exciting basic technologies and new approaches to solving scientific problems. It provides a forum for interdisciplinary research which acts as a pipeline, facilitating the two-way flow of ideas and understanding between the extensive bodies of knowledge of the different disciplines. It has two principal aims: to draw on biology to enrich engineering and to draw from engineering to enrich biology.
The journal aims to include input from across all intersecting areas of both fields. In biology, this would include work in all fields from physiology to ecology, with either zoological or botanical focus. In engineering, this would include both design and practical application of biomimetic or bioinspired devices and systems. Typical areas of interest include:
Systems, designs and structure
Communication and navigation
Cooperative behaviour
Self-organizing biological systems
Self-healing and self-assembly
Aerial locomotion and aerospace applications of biomimetics
Biomorphic surface and subsurface systems
Marine dynamics: swimming and underwater dynamics
Applications of novel materials
Biomechanics; including movement, locomotion, fluidics
Cellular behaviour
Sensors and senses
Biomimetic or bioinformed approaches to geological exploration.