量化美国 60 岁及以上成年人对呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 疫苗犹豫不决的普遍程度和决定因素。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M. Motta , T. Callaghan , M. Padmanabhan , J. Ross , L.M. Gargano , S. Bowman , D. Yokum
{"title":"量化美国 60 岁及以上成年人对呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 疫苗犹豫不决的普遍程度和决定因素。","authors":"M. Motta ,&nbsp;T. Callaghan ,&nbsp;M. Padmanabhan ,&nbsp;J. Ross ,&nbsp;L.M. Gargano ,&nbsp;S. Bowman ,&nbsp;D. Yokum","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Federal regulators recently authorised two vaccines designed to prevent infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for adults aged 60 or older. While some efforts have been made to study vaccine uptake thus far, few have studied this group's intentions to vaccinate, as well as potential barriers to vaccination. This omission is noteworthy as adults aged 60 or older may be at an increased risk of experiencing severe complications from RSV infection.</div></div><div><h3>Study design &amp; Methods</h3><div>We fielded a nationally representative survey of 1200 US adults (<em>n</em> = 362 aged 60+). Respondents aged 60 or older were asked a series of questions about their willingness to receive an RSV vaccine, vaccine safety, and efficacy attitudes, and their knowledge about vaccination eligibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that a majority of seniors (53%) intend to refuse an RSV vaccine. As of late fall 2023, just 14% of those eligible had already received an RSV vaccine. Multivariate regression models suggest that belief in the safety and efficacy of the RSV vaccine, as well as previous flu and COVID-19 vaccine uptake, are associated with increased RSV vaccination intentions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We document high levels of RSV vaccine hesitancy among adults aged 60 or older and show that negative vaccine attitudes and non-vaccination behaviors motivate RSV vaccine refusal. Our work thereby raises the possibility that efforts to communicate the safety and efficacy of RSV vaccination may have beneficial effects on RSV vaccine uptake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the prevalence and determinants of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine hesitancy in US adults aged 60 or older\",\"authors\":\"M. Motta ,&nbsp;T. Callaghan ,&nbsp;M. Padmanabhan ,&nbsp;J. Ross ,&nbsp;L.M. Gargano ,&nbsp;S. Bowman ,&nbsp;D. Yokum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Federal regulators recently authorised two vaccines designed to prevent infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for adults aged 60 or older. While some efforts have been made to study vaccine uptake thus far, few have studied this group's intentions to vaccinate, as well as potential barriers to vaccination. This omission is noteworthy as adults aged 60 or older may be at an increased risk of experiencing severe complications from RSV infection.</div></div><div><h3>Study design &amp; Methods</h3><div>We fielded a nationally representative survey of 1200 US adults (<em>n</em> = 362 aged 60+). Respondents aged 60 or older were asked a series of questions about their willingness to receive an RSV vaccine, vaccine safety, and efficacy attitudes, and their knowledge about vaccination eligibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that a majority of seniors (53%) intend to refuse an RSV vaccine. As of late fall 2023, just 14% of those eligible had already received an RSV vaccine. Multivariate regression models suggest that belief in the safety and efficacy of the RSV vaccine, as well as previous flu and COVID-19 vaccine uptake, are associated with increased RSV vaccination intentions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We document high levels of RSV vaccine hesitancy among adults aged 60 or older and show that negative vaccine attitudes and non-vaccination behaviors motivate RSV vaccine refusal. Our work thereby raises the possibility that efforts to communicate the safety and efficacy of RSV vaccination may have beneficial effects on RSV vaccine uptake.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624003482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:联邦监管机构最近批准了两种疫苗,旨在预防 60 岁或以上成年人感染呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV)。虽然迄今为止已经对疫苗的接种情况进行了一些研究,但很少有人研究过这一群体接种疫苗的意愿以及接种疫苗的潜在障碍。这一疏忽值得注意,因为 60 岁或以上的成年人感染 RSV 后出现严重并发症的风险可能会增加:我们对 1200 名美国成年人(n = 362 名 60 岁以上的成年人)进行了一项具有全国代表性的调查。我们向 60 岁或以上的受访者提出了一系列问题,内容涉及他们接种 RSV 疫苗的意愿、对疫苗安全性和有效性的态度以及他们对疫苗接种资格的了解:我们发现,大多数老年人(53%)打算拒绝接种 RSV 疫苗。截至 2023 年晚秋,仅有 14% 的合格者已经接种了 RSV 疫苗。多变量回归模型表明,相信 RSV 疫苗的安全性和有效性以及之前接种流感疫苗和 COVID-19 疫苗与 RSV 疫苗接种意向的增加有关:我们记录了 60 岁或以上成年人对 RSV 疫苗的高度犹豫,并表明消极的疫苗态度和不接种行为是拒绝接种 RSV 疫苗的原因。因此,我们的工作提出了一种可能性,即努力宣传 RSV 疫苗接种的安全性和有效性可能会对 RSV 疫苗的接种产生有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the prevalence and determinants of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine hesitancy in US adults aged 60 or older

Objective

Federal regulators recently authorised two vaccines designed to prevent infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for adults aged 60 or older. While some efforts have been made to study vaccine uptake thus far, few have studied this group's intentions to vaccinate, as well as potential barriers to vaccination. This omission is noteworthy as adults aged 60 or older may be at an increased risk of experiencing severe complications from RSV infection.

Study design & Methods

We fielded a nationally representative survey of 1200 US adults (n = 362 aged 60+). Respondents aged 60 or older were asked a series of questions about their willingness to receive an RSV vaccine, vaccine safety, and efficacy attitudes, and their knowledge about vaccination eligibility.

Results

We find that a majority of seniors (53%) intend to refuse an RSV vaccine. As of late fall 2023, just 14% of those eligible had already received an RSV vaccine. Multivariate regression models suggest that belief in the safety and efficacy of the RSV vaccine, as well as previous flu and COVID-19 vaccine uptake, are associated with increased RSV vaccination intentions.

Conclusions

We document high levels of RSV vaccine hesitancy among adults aged 60 or older and show that negative vaccine attitudes and non-vaccination behaviors motivate RSV vaccine refusal. Our work thereby raises the possibility that efforts to communicate the safety and efficacy of RSV vaccination may have beneficial effects on RSV vaccine uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信